| Message ID | 886e059dc9096dcc9e1daa1eb1a07ec34d72aa74.1656323519.git.pabeni@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Commit | 106e355055579d9e0724be8ef9b989bae20c6fa4 |
| Delegated to: | Matthieu Baerts |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [mptcp-net] mptcp: fix locking in mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy() | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| matttbe/build | success | Build and static analysis OK |
| matttbe/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 51 lines checked |
| matttbe/KVM_Validation__normal | success | Success! ✅ |
| matttbe/KVM_Validation__debug | success | Success! ✅ |
Hi Paolo, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! But sadly, our CI spotted some issues with it when trying to build it. You can find more details there: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/886e059dc9096dcc9e1daa1eb1a07ec34d72aa74.1656323519.git.pabeni@redhat.com/ https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/2568360433 Status: Initiator: MPTCPimporter Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/31a3bb3c20ba Feel free to reply to this email if you cannot access logs, if you need some support to fix the error, if this doesn't seem to be caused by your modifications or if the error is a false positive one. Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares)
Hello, On 27/06/2022 12:06, MPTCP CI wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > Thank you for your modifications, that's great! > > But sadly, our CI spotted some issues with it when trying to build it. > > You can find more details there: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/patch/886e059dc9096dcc9e1daa1eb1a07ec34d72aa74.1656323519.git.pabeni@redhat.com/ > https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/2568360433 Mmh, there was no error :-/ I will monitor that. Cheers, Matt
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal:
- Success! ✅:
- Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6101836691144704
- Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6101836691144704/summary/summary.txt
- KVM Validation: debug:
- Success! ✅:
- Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5538886737723392
- Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5538886737723392/summary/summary.txt
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/31a3bb3c20ba
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-debug
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares)
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Paolo Abeni wrote: > The user-space PM subflow removal path uses a couple of helpers > that must be called under the msk socket lock and the current > code lacks such requirement. > > Change the existing lock scope so that the relevant code is under > its protection. > > Fixes: d9a4594edabf ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> > --- > It should close issues/287, let's see what the CI says Thanks for tracking this down, Paolo. Patch looks good, tests are passing for me. Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> > --- > net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 19 ++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c > index 3d1d365e9c6f..33be79f0e9c2 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c > @@ -307,15 +307,11 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_nl_find_ssk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, > const struct mptcp_addr_info *local, > const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote) > { > - struct sock *sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk; > struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; > - struct sock *found = NULL; > > if (local->family != remote->family) > return NULL; > > - lock_sock(sk); > - > mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) { > const struct inet_sock *issk; > struct sock *ssk; > @@ -348,16 +344,11 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_nl_find_ssk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, > } > > if (issk->inet_sport == local->port && > - issk->inet_dport == remote->port) { > - found = ssk; > - goto found; > - } > + issk->inet_dport == remote->port) > + return ssk; > } > > -found: > - release_sock(sk); > - > - return found; > + return NULL; > } > > int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) > @@ -413,6 +404,7 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) > } > > sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk; > + lock_sock(sk); > ssk = mptcp_nl_find_ssk(msk, &addr_l, &addr_r); > if (ssk) { > struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); > @@ -424,8 +416,9 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) > } else { > err = -ESRCH; > } > + release_sock(sk); > > - destroy_err: > +destroy_err: > sock_put((struct sock *)msk); > return err; > } > -- > 2.35.3 > > > -- Mat Martineau Intel
Hi Paolo, Mat, On 27/06/2022 11:58, Paolo Abeni wrote: > The user-space PM subflow removal path uses a couple of helpers > that must be called under the msk socket lock and the current > code lacks such requirement. > > Change the existing lock scope so that the relevant code is under > its protection. > > Fixes: d9a4594edabf ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE") > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Thank you for the patch and the review! Now in our tree (fixes for -net) with Mat's RvB tag: New patches for t/upstream-net: - 106e35505557: mptcp: fix locking in mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy() - 52865f3cc71f: tg:msg: add Closes tag - Results: 93f7e050cd84..d964bfb845c8 (export) New patches for t/upstream: - 106e35505557: mptcp: fix locking in mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy() - 52865f3cc71f: tg:msg: add Closes tag - Results: 9756359748a6..a972bdf0fdec (export) Builds and tests are now in progress: https://cirrus-ci.com/github/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/export-net/20220628T160121 https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/workflows/build-validation.yml?query=branch:export-net https://cirrus-ci.com/github/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/export/20220628T160121 https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/workflows/build-validation.yml?query=branch:export > --- > It should close issues/287, let's see what the CI says I added the "Closes" tag in the commit message to link the patch with the issue and automatically close the ticket ;-) Cheers, Matt
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c index 3d1d365e9c6f..33be79f0e9c2 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c @@ -307,15 +307,11 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_nl_find_ssk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *local, const struct mptcp_addr_info *remote) { - struct sock *sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk; struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; - struct sock *found = NULL; if (local->family != remote->family) return NULL; - lock_sock(sk); - mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) { const struct inet_sock *issk; struct sock *ssk; @@ -348,16 +344,11 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_nl_find_ssk(struct mptcp_sock *msk, } if (issk->inet_sport == local->port && - issk->inet_dport == remote->port) { - found = ssk; - goto found; - } + issk->inet_dport == remote->port) + return ssk; } -found: - release_sock(sk); - - return found; + return NULL; } int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) @@ -413,6 +404,7 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) } sk = &msk->sk.icsk_inet.sk; + lock_sock(sk); ssk = mptcp_nl_find_ssk(msk, &addr_l, &addr_r); if (ssk) { struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); @@ -424,8 +416,9 @@ int mptcp_nl_cmd_sf_destroy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) } else { err = -ESRCH; } + release_sock(sk); - destroy_err: +destroy_err: sock_put((struct sock *)msk); return err; }
The user-space PM subflow removal path uses a couple of helpers that must be called under the msk socket lock and the current code lacks such requirement. Change the existing lock scope so that the relevant code is under its protection. Fixes: d9a4594edabf ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE") Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> --- It should close issues/287, let's see what the CI says --- net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 19 ++++++------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)