diff mbox series

[mptcp-next,v4] mptcp: use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in userspace pm

Message ID a2efcb64bcd072611eac0dff346af2392b3bcb96.1734684556.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [mptcp-next,v4] mptcp: use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in userspace pm | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
matttbe/build success Build and static analysis OK
matttbe/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 134 lines checked
matttbe/shellcheck success MPTCP selftests files have not been modified
matttbe/KVM_Validation__normal success Success! ✅
matttbe/KVM_Validation__debug success Success! ✅
matttbe/KVM_Validation__btf-normal__only_bpftest_all_ success Success! ✅
matttbe/KVM_Validation__btf-debug__only_bpftest_all_ warning Unstable: 1 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp

Commit Message

Geliang Tang Dec. 20, 2024, 8:50 a.m. UTC 
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

A more general way to check if MPTCP_PM_ATTR_* exists in 'info'
is to use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*) instead of
directly reading info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*] and then checking
if it's NULL.

So this patch uses GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK() for userspace PM in
mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(),
mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit()
and mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock().

'Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>'
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
v4:
 - use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in more functions as Matt suggested (thanks)

v3:
 - use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock only
 - drop GENL_SET_ERR_MSG as Matt suggested (thanks)

v2:
 - use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in get_addr(), dump_addr() and set_flags()
   too.
---
 net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Comments

MPTCP CI Dec. 20, 2024, 9:50 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi Geliang,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug: Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Unstable: 1 failed test(s): bpftest_test_progs-cpuv4_mptcp
Matthieu Baerts Dec. 21, 2024, 9:33 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Geliang,

On 20/12/2024 09:50, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> A more general way to check if MPTCP_PM_ATTR_* exists in 'info'
> is to use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*) instead of
> directly reading info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_*] and then checking
> if it's NULL.
> 
> So this patch uses GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK() for userspace PM in
> mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(),
> mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(), mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit()
> and mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock().
> 
> 'Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>'
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> v4:
>  - use GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK in more functions as Matt suggested (thanks)

Thank you for the v4!

(...)

> @@ -309,18 +307,17 @@ void mptcp_pm_remove_addr_entry(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
>  
>  int mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>  {
> -	struct nlattr *id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID];
>  	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *match;
>  	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
> +	struct nlattr *id;
>  	int err = -EINVAL;
>  	struct sock *sk;
>  	u8 id_val;
>  
> -	if (!id) {
> -		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required ID");
> +	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID))
>  		return err;
> -	}
>  
> +	id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID];
>  	id_val = nla_get_u8(id);

Small detail: do we still need the 'struct nlattr *' variables? Here it
looks like you could directly have:

  id_val = nla_get_u8(info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID]);

Same in the other functions, no? Up to you.

(...)

Cheers,
Matt
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
index 740a10d669f8..9299ef3d2f55 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_userspace.c
@@ -175,14 +175,13 @@  bool mptcp_userspace_pm_is_backup(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 
 static struct mptcp_sock *mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(const struct genl_info *info)
 {
-	struct nlattr *token = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN];
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+	struct nlattr *token;
 
-	if (!token) {
-		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required token");
+	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN))
 		return NULL;
-	}
 
+	token = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_TOKEN];
 	msk = mptcp_token_get_sock(genl_info_net(info), nla_get_u32(token));
 	if (!msk) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, token, "invalid token");
@@ -200,16 +199,14 @@  static struct mptcp_sock *mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(const struct genl_info *in
 
 int mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
-	struct nlattr *addr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry addr_val;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+	struct nlattr *addr;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	struct sock *sk;
 
-	if (!addr) {
-		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required address");
+	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR))
 		return err;
-	}
 
 	msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
 	if (!msk)
@@ -217,6 +214,7 @@  int mptcp_pm_nl_announce_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
 	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
 
+	addr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(addr, info, true, &addr_val);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "error parsing local address");
@@ -309,18 +307,17 @@  void mptcp_pm_remove_addr_entry(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 
 int mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
-	struct nlattr *id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID];
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *match;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
+	struct nlattr *id;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	struct sock *sk;
 	u8 id_val;
 
-	if (!id) {
-		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required ID");
+	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID))
 		return err;
-	}
 
+	id = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_LOC_ID];
 	id_val = nla_get_u8(id);
 
 	msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
@@ -362,19 +359,17 @@  int mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
 int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
-	struct nlattr *raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
-	struct nlattr *laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry entry = { 0 };
 	struct mptcp_addr_info addr_r;
+	struct nlattr *raddr, *laddr;
 	struct mptcp_pm_local local;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 	struct sock *sk;
 
-	if (!laddr || !raddr) {
-		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required address(es)");
+	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR) ||
+	    GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE))
 		return err;
-	}
 
 	msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
 	if (!msk)
@@ -382,6 +377,7 @@  int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
 	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
 
+	laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(laddr, info, true, &entry);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, laddr, "error parsing local addr");
@@ -395,6 +391,7 @@  int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_create_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	}
 	entry.flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW;
 
+	raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
 	err = mptcp_pm_parse_addr(raddr, info, &addr_r);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, raddr, "error parsing remote addr");
@@ -483,18 +480,16 @@  static struct sock *mptcp_nl_find_ssk(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 
 int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 {
-	struct nlattr *raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
-	struct nlattr *laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry addr_l;
 	struct mptcp_addr_info addr_r;
+	struct nlattr *raddr, *laddr;
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk;
 	struct sock *sk, *ssk;
 	int err = -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!laddr || !raddr) {
-		GENL_SET_ERR_MSG(info, "missing required address(es)");
+	if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR) ||
+	    GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE))
 		return err;
-	}
 
 	msk = mptcp_userspace_pm_get_sock(info);
 	if (!msk)
@@ -502,12 +497,14 @@  int mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_destroy_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info
 
 	sk = (struct sock *)msk;
 
+	laddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR];
 	err = mptcp_pm_parse_entry(laddr, info, true, &addr_l);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, laddr, "error parsing local addr");
 		goto destroy_err;
 	}
 
+	raddr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ATTR_ADDR_REMOTE];
 	err = mptcp_pm_parse_addr(raddr, info, &addr_r);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, raddr, "error parsing remote addr");