mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,0/5] selftests/bpf: Migrate test_tcpbpf_user to be a part of test_progs framework

Message ID 160416890683.710453.7723265174628409401.stgit@localhost.localdomain (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: Migrate test_tcpbpf_user to be a part of test_progs framework | expand

Message

Alexander Duyck Oct. 31, 2020, 6:31 p.m. UTC
Move the test functionality from test_tcpbpf_user into the test_progs
framework so that it will be run any time the test_progs framework is run.
This will help to prevent future test escapes as the individual tests, such
as test_tcpbpf_user, are less likely to be run by developers and CI
tests.

As a part of moving it over the series goes through and updates the code to
make use of the existing APIs included in the test_progs framework. This is
meant to simplify and streamline the test code and avoid duplication of
effort.

v2: Dropped test_tcpbpf_user from .gitignore
    Replaced CHECK_FAIL calls with CHECK calls
    Minimized changes in patch 1 when moving the file
    Updated stg mail command line to display renames in submission
    Added shutdown logic to end of run_test function to guarantee close
    Added patch that replaces the two maps with use of global variables    

---

Alexander Duyck (5):
      selftests/bpf: Move test_tcppbf_user into test_progs
      selftests/bpf: Drop python client/server in favor of threads
      selftests/bpf: Replace EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ and refactor verify_results
      selftests/bpf: Migrate tcpbpf_user.c to use BPF skeleton
      selftest/bpf: Use global variables instead of maps for test_tcpbpf_kern


 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c    | 239 +++++++++---------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c    |  86 +------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_client.py     |  50 ----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_server.py     |  80 ------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf.h     |   2 +
 5 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_client.py
 delete mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_server.py

--

Comments

Alexander Duyck Oct. 31, 2020, 7:03 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 11:31 AM Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Move the test functionality from test_tcpbpf_user into the test_progs
> framework so that it will be run any time the test_progs framework is run.
> This will help to prevent future test escapes as the individual tests, such
> as test_tcpbpf_user, are less likely to be run by developers and CI
> tests.
>
> As a part of moving it over the series goes through and updates the code to
> make use of the existing APIs included in the test_progs framework. This is
> meant to simplify and streamline the test code and avoid duplication of
> effort.
>
> v2: Dropped test_tcpbpf_user from .gitignore
>     Replaced CHECK_FAIL calls with CHECK calls
>     Minimized changes in patch 1 when moving the file
>     Updated stg mail command line to display renames in submission
>     Added shutdown logic to end of run_test function to guarantee close
>     Added patch that replaces the two maps with use of global variables
>
> ---
>
> Alexander Duyck (5):
>       selftests/bpf: Move test_tcppbf_user into test_progs
>       selftests/bpf: Drop python client/server in favor of threads
>       selftests/bpf: Replace EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ and refactor verify_results
>       selftests/bpf: Migrate tcpbpf_user.c to use BPF skeleton
>       selftest/bpf: Use global variables instead of maps for test_tcpbpf_kern
>
>
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcpbpf_user.c    | 239 +++++++++---------
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c    |  86 +------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_client.py     |  50 ----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_server.py     |  80 ------
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf.h     |   2 +
>  5 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_client.py
>  delete mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tcp_server.py
>
> --

It looks like the "--to" on the cover page was dropped and it wasn't
delivered to the bpf mailing list. So I am just going to reply to the
one that was delivered to netdev so that it is visible for the people
on the bpf list.

Thanks.

- Alex