From patchwork Wed Dec 23 14:45:31 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rasmus Villemoes X-Patchwork-Id: 11988425 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD11CC433DB for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9160422482 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727901AbgLWOqd (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:46:33 -0500 Received: from mail-eopbgr00126.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.0.126]:61785 "EHLO EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726631AbgLWOqc (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:46:32 -0500 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=flmTNvqHV1LfKXhgq9mPTyiYfNjjIGgLllc0Qby+uczALYk3A4zASbSvSvjOKZNGSG1OiuRW74HzMIzYtfliS4cZYQyel6WUSIEA5+I8qBN4DEeyFFPNJFGdOUBBgOktswZXi4smToJiW+aXP3qmGMscQ99CFsE7qSV5g6MBzIs4CzH3oqLVCNRhH3v5g2QYRTobAVML4F5FkgW/0tV4Nwx5IcEoVQR5+v/7mshMiuZ9Cz6dySEYlj6+uUvyGEzKJ/lXa5MYnZQBSYflmlGTVC24bI/ZRrRYuNDDzqroU3qk+4RJoeVciYNjQ1Hrn+aimCxO03CYLAR6CePSvTrcYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=++z9tOgtmh/5x4eGs+urNGZf48et0pU2jXHFgyS8Vd4=; b=ZB7X9W6n4JnijeAzYFhGRmBqlCBaQEnrU/CgciJsoS1+1GRTI0DGP1TMbmxLpASYTaIGmcZuVr7v4/LUSWU76jqTTU16gvN+8h3IKd9cYrMhQpb2gLEPu5zkzBcNtVFQm0Aovq0M/SmVDwuO4K5YQxFqL9G3OPLBtcsAGgWmbS50kUZ3dsMj2mN4DV2jJJQkYQNV4M06HJfaQ2FWdMRuwhkCvH82nMvnvOe5Fx+WcHHlyy2pjS9GqAWv86dGft6wc2XwCp8YwL/L0hh0k+XLGvenMxaESU4xB8ge2u6WGQo5PEDIX2hPxV+4WKLRqzve3HdAXnjWwlj7YBO7lcC0VQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=prevas.dk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=prevas.dk; dkim=pass header.d=prevas.dk; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=prevas.dk; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=++z9tOgtmh/5x4eGs+urNGZf48et0pU2jXHFgyS8Vd4=; b=hywU5WJraksGHYpq3iBFwV3XjQplPcF81ETFMOFjEM03qo8jX825RKdar1aJ1fAJYp4nn4o8GNaby64Tzt4hkmlyQRZs38OwaRXDsR0JtMJsi9wkkyh9WhH+gptDn0lUb395jWNBmP9TlKj66bFAvjufWW9X0RFY9w7ECBgHARw= Authentication-Results: vger.kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;vger.kernel.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=prevas.dk; Received: from AM0PR10MB1874.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:208:3f::10) by AM0PR10MB3057.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:208:162::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3676.33; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:45:43 +0000 Received: from AM0PR10MB1874.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::9068:c899:48f:a8e3]) by AM0PR10MB1874.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::9068:c899:48f:a8e3%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3676.033; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:45:43 +0000 From: Rasmus Villemoes To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Horatiu Vultur Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] MRP without hardware offload? Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:45:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20201223144533.4145-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 X-Originating-IP: [5.186.115.188] X-ClientProxiedBy: AS8PR04CA0142.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:127::27) To AM0PR10MB1874.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:208:3f::10) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from prevas-ravi.prevas.se (5.186.115.188) by AS8PR04CA0142.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:127::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3700.27 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:45:43 +0000 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: e4a2411a-da2f-4bcd-9a8e-08d8a7516d0f X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: AM0PR10MB3057: X-MS-Exchange-Transport-Forked: True X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:2803; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: TGFSEAvxqbojSxxC05QG08ZKxQPOqkTZ7Bxh6WjMaTvKHRu8r99Z6tEq5lyxk+AqzVHtflfTaeTXRRY6dgAgfUr6fwN1YaTmWNNTciabTHvCVWVmOLje8tUWlScWIKihhG/Ni9ewPQLQhg9eaZfhNFpkDeq3DSSvy+BtkzBagG418yla1GD32FCqA+hFBYePzmv4suVYIIV4DkIyo6TtjY8e9KJ1/EcPVFCnoFvtimjLtw78II7NAJMMv0T0Eb0BdeEmC0CAGj+dEepzgMau1oKMHSYc6MWGdOCv6VYElmF+QU8IvnIa+FU+32VJMw+DOUdXlo73TWq6OS8avTpSlvrMEEglMpCgngy1kisppcixY9iJ56wZ5XhkuNE78E93tGt+8u2S7lQaVKmqSmTi15uPgtb+WGrFANUkfMstTQSQ/p/tsP+E+G2NOPp5QWIbocIg7hWtdBg8Zz2eS4ce/w== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:AM0PR10MB1874.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(366004)(396003)(136003)(39840400004)(376002)(346002)(54906003)(4326008)(6512007)(6486002)(107886003)(316002)(16526019)(5660300002)(26005)(66476007)(8676002)(66556008)(6506007)(83380400001)(66946007)(186003)(52116002)(2616005)(6916009)(6666004)(966005)(44832011)(1076003)(86362001)(8976002)(36756003)(2906002)(8936002)(956004)(478600001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: prevas.dk X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM0PR10MB1874.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2020 14:45:43.5014 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: d350cf71-778d-4780-88f5-071a4cb1ed61 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e4a2411a-da2f-4bcd-9a8e-08d8a7516d0f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: SPwHdR7w431i4fYvllln4odSqe6LxmD5iD9rrc3QHoJbjjquu50GO16Rsc2uxcfPPG8AySsHAGTZ3y6V/hh4Q1ZL1DmOPEzf8YC2P84P+YI= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR10MB3057 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Hi Horatiu and net folks I'm having quite some trouble getting MRP working in a simple setup involving three mv88e6250 switches in a ring, with one node set as manager and the other two as clients. I'm reasonably confident these two patches are necessary and correct (though the second one affects quite a bit more than MRP, so comments welcome), but they are not sufficient - for example, I'm wondering about why there doesn't seem to be any code guarding against sending a test packet back out the port it came in. I have tried applying a few more patches, but since the end result still doesn't seem to result in a working MRP setup, I'm a bit out of ideas, and not proposing any of those yet. Has anyone managed to set up an MRP ring with no hardware offload support? I'm using commit 9030e898a2f232fdb4a3b2ec5e91fa483e31eeaf from https://github.com/microchip-ung/mrp.git and kernel v5.10.2. Rasmus Villemoes (2): net: mrp: fix definitions of MRP test packets net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h | 4 ++-- net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)