mbox series

[net,0/2] inet: use siphash in exception handling

Message ID 20210825231729.401676-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series inet: use siphash in exception handling | expand

Message

Eric Dumazet Aug. 25, 2021, 11:17 p.m. UTC
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

A group of security researchers brought to our attention
the weakness of hash functions used in rt6_exception_hash()
and fnhe_hashfun()

I made two distinct patches to help backports, since IPv6
part was added in 4.15

Eric Dumazet (2):
  ipv6: use siphash in rt6_exception_hash()
  ipv4: use siphash instead of Jenkins in fnhe_hashfun()

 net/ipv4/route.c | 12 ++++++------
 net/ipv6/route.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 26, 2021, 9:30 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:17:27 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> A group of security researchers brought to our attention
> the weakness of hash functions used in rt6_exception_hash()
> and fnhe_hashfun()
> 
> I made two distinct patches to help backports, since IPv6
> part was added in 4.15
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,1/2] ipv6: use siphash in rt6_exception_hash()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4785305c05b2
  - [net,2/2] ipv4: use siphash instead of Jenkins in fnhe_hashfun()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/6457378fe796

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html