Message ID | 20210907071928.9750-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | selftests: xsk: facilitate adding tests | expand |
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 09:19:08AM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > This patch set facilitates adding new tests as well as describing > existing ones in the xsk selftests suite and adds 3 new test suites at > the end. The idea is to isolate the run-time that executes the test > from the actual implementation of the test. Today, implementing a test > amounts to adding test specific if-statements all around the run-time, > which is not scalable or amenable for reuse. This patch set instead > introduces a test specification that is the only thing that a test > fills in. The run-time then gets this specification and acts upon it > completely unaware of what test it is executing. This way, we can get > rid of all test specific if-statements from the run-time and the > implementation of the test can be contained in a single function. This > hopefully makes it easier to add tests and for users to understand > what the test accomplishes. > > As a recap of what the run-time does: each test is based on the > run-time launching two threads and connecting a veth link between the > two threads. Each thread opens an AF_XDP socket on that veth interface > and one of them sends traffic that the other one receives and > validates. Each thread has its own umem. Note that this behavior is > not changed by this patch set. > > A test specification consists of several items. Most importantly: > > * Two packet streams. One for Tx thread that specifies what traffic to > send and one for the Rx thread that specifies what that thread > should receive. If it receives exactly what is specified, the test > passes, otherwise it fails. A packet stream can also specify what > buffers in the umem that should be used by the Rx and Tx threads. > > * What kind of AF_XDP sockets it should create and bind to what > interfaces > > * How many times it should repeat the socket creation and destruction > > * The name of the test > > The interface for the test spec is the following: > > void test_spec_init(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj_tx, > struct ifobject *ifobj_rx, enum test_mode mode); > > /* Reset everything but the interface specifications and the mode */ > void test_spec_reset(struct test_spec *test); > > void test_spec_set_name(struct test_spec *test, const char *name); > > > Packet streams have the following interfaces: > > struct pkt *pkt_stream_get_pkt(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, u32 pkt_nb) > > struct pkt *pkt_stream_get_next_rx_pkt(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream) > > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, > u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len); > > void pkt_stream_delete(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream); > > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_clone(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, > struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream); > > /* Replaces all packets in the stream*/ > void pkt_stream_replace(struct test_spec *test, u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len); > > /* Replaces every other packet in the stream */ > void pkt_stream_replace_half(struct test_spec *test, u32 pkt_len, u32 offset); > > /* For creating custom made packet streams */ > void pkt_stream_generate_custom(struct test_spec *test, struct pkt *pkts, > u32 nb_pkts); > > /* Restores the default packet stream */ > void pkt_stream_restore_default(struct test_spec *test); > > > A test can then then in the most basic case described like this > (provided the test specification has been created before calling the > function): > > static bool testapp_aligned(struct test_spec *test) > { > test_spec_set_name(test, "RUN_TO_COMPLETION"); > testapp_validate_traffic(test); > } > > Running the same test in unaligned mode would then look like this: > > static bool testapp_unaligned(struct test_spec *test) > { > if (!hugepages_present(test->ifobj_tx)) { > ksft_test_result_skip("No 2M huge pages present.\n"); > return false; > } > > test_spec_set_name(test, "UNALIGNED_MODE"); > test->ifobj_tx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; > test->ifobj_rx->umem->unaligned_mode = true; > /* Let half of the packets straddle a buffer boundrary */ > pkt_stream_replace_half(test, PKT_SIZE, > XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE - 32); > /* Populate fill ring with addresses in the packet stream */ > test->ifobj_rx->pkt_stream->use_addr_for_fill = true; > testapp_validate_traffic(test); > > pkt_stream_restore_default(test); > return true; > } > > 3 of the last 4 patches in the set add 3 new test suites, one for > unaligned mode, one for testing the rejection of tricky invalid > descriptors plus the acceptance of some valid ones in the Tx ring, and > one for testing 2K frame sizes (the default is 4K). > > What is left to do for follow-up patches: > > * Convert the statistics tests to the new framework. > > * Implement a way of registering new tests without having the enum > test_type. Once this has been done (together with the previous > bullet), all the test types can be dropped from the header > file. This means that we should be able to add tests by just writing > a single function with a new test specification, which is one of the > goals. > > * Introduce functions for manipulating parts of the test or interface > spec instead of direct manipulations such as > test->ifobj_rx->pkt_stream->use_addr_for_fill = true; which is kind > of awkward. > > * Move the run-time and its interface to its own .c and .h files. Then > we can have all the tests in a separate file. > > * Better error reporting if a test fails. Today it does not state what > test fails and might not continue execute the rest of the tests due > to this failure. Failures are not propagated upwards through the > functions so a failed test will also be a passed test, which messes > up the stats counting. This needs to be changed. > > * Add option to run specific test instead of all of them > > * Introduce pacing of sent packets so that they are never dropped > by the receiver even if it is stalled for some reason. If you run > the current tests on a heavily loaded system, they might fail in SKB > mode due to packets being dropped by the driver on Tx. Though I have > never seen it, it might happen. > > v1 -> v2: > > * Fixed a number of spelling errors [Maciej] > * Fixed use after free bug in pkt_stream_replace() [Maciej] > * pkt_stream_set -> pkt_stream_generate_custom [Maciej] > * Fixed formatting problem in testapp_invalid_desc() [Maciej] > > Thanks: Magnus I like the flexibility that this set is bringing to xdpxceiver. Went through the v2 and this LGTM. Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> > > Magnus Karlsson (20): > selftests: xsk: simplify xsk and umem arrays > selftests: xsk: introduce type for thread function > selftests: xsk: introduce test specifications > selftests: xsk: move num_frames and frame_headroom to xsk_umem_info > selftests: xsk: move rxqsize into xsk_socket_info > selftests: xsk: make frame_size configurable > selftests: xsx: introduce test name in test spec > selftests: xsk: add use_poll to ifobject > selftests: xsk: introduce rx_on and tx_on in ifobject > selftests: xsk: replace second_step global variable > selftests: xsk: specify number of sockets to create > selftests: xsk: make xdp_flags and bind_flags local > selftests: xsx: make pthreads local scope > selftests: xsk: eliminate MAX_SOCKS define > selftests: xsk: allow for invalid packets > selftests: xsk: introduce replacing the default packet stream > selftests: xsk: add test for unaligned mode > selftests: xsk: eliminate test specific if-statement in test runner > selftests: xsk: add tests for invalid xsk descriptors > selftests: xsk: add tests for 2K frame size > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 872 +++++++++++++++-------- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.h | 66 +- > 2 files changed, 608 insertions(+), 330 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: 27151f177827d478508e756c7657273261aaf8a9 > -- > 2.29.0
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:19:08 +0200 you wrote: > This patch set facilitates adding new tests as well as describing > existing ones in the xsk selftests suite and adds 3 new test suites at > the end. The idea is to isolate the run-time that executes the test > from the actual implementation of the test. Today, implementing a test > amounts to adding test specific if-statements all around the run-time, > which is not scalable or amenable for reuse. This patch set instead > introduces a test specification that is the only thing that a test > fills in. The run-time then gets this specification and acts upon it > completely unaware of what test it is executing. This way, we can get > rid of all test specific if-statements from the run-time and the > implementation of the test can be contained in a single function. This > hopefully makes it easier to add tests and for users to understand > what the test accomplishes. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v2,01/20] selftests: xsk: simplify xsk and umem arrays https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ed7b74dc7777 - [bpf-next,v2,02/20] selftests: xsk: introduce type for thread function https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/744eb5c882e8 - [bpf-next,v2,03/20] selftests: xsk: introduce test specifications https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ce74acaf015c - [bpf-next,v2,04/20] selftests: xsk: move num_frames and frame_headroom to xsk_umem_info https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/83f4ae2f26bd - [bpf-next,v2,05/20] selftests: xsk: move rxqsize into xsk_socket_info https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4bf8ee65ba4e - [bpf-next,v2,06/20] selftests: xsk: make frame_size configurable https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c160d7afba8f - [bpf-next,v2,07/20] selftests: xsx: introduce test name in test spec https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/53cb3cec2f1e - [bpf-next,v2,08/20] selftests: xsk: add use_poll to ifobject https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/119d4b02feb5 - [bpf-next,v2,09/20] selftests: xsk: introduce rx_on and tx_on in ifobject https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1856c24db0a8 - [bpf-next,v2,10/20] selftests: xsk: replace second_step global variable https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/55be575dc13c - [bpf-next,v2,11/20] selftests: xsk: specify number of sockets to create https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/85c6c9573970 - [bpf-next,v2,12/20] selftests: xsk: make xdp_flags and bind_flags local https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/af6731d1e1c6 - [bpf-next,v2,13/20] selftests: xsx: make pthreads local scope https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e2d850d5346c - [bpf-next,v2,14/20] selftests: xsk: eliminate MAX_SOCKS define https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8ce7192b508d - [bpf-next,v2,15/20] selftests: xsk: allow for invalid packets https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8abf6f725a9e - [bpf-next,v2,16/20] selftests: xsk: introduce replacing the default packet stream https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/605091c5100d - [bpf-next,v2,17/20] selftests: xsk: add test for unaligned mode https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a4ba98dd0c69 - [bpf-next,v2,18/20] selftests: xsk: eliminate test specific if-statement in test runner https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6ce67b5165e6 - [bpf-next,v2,19/20] selftests: xsk: add tests for invalid xsk descriptors https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0d1b7f3a00cf - [bpf-next,v2,20/20] selftests: xsk: add tests for 2K frame size https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/909f0e28207c You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html