Message ID | 20211230080305.1068950-1-imagedong@tencent.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E091BC433FE for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 08:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237259AbhL3ID3 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 03:03:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39160 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231345AbhL3ID2 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 03:03:28 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1043.google.com (mail-pj1-x1043.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1043]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F147C061574; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1043.google.com with SMTP id a11-20020a17090a854b00b001b11aae38d6so22448456pjw.2; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:03:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bw8QPyeMNO0bT9eJ6U67Ytz/lRIpuevXgnltLrWQ09A=; b=qJDEbmOdqd0Usp82bPsUMAjRiBYW1kS7js4TrkkWUqYEUE89Mn5syio4yqk3cS2cqY Nps7Z7ha5A5V0/bSMxpzHFGot1BSA0F5yQOlnFEzy16Klcl7LoC/TgX4Lc2GlKdQzAdb q3wgmpArR+KsSkBQE2DWjFcAq2aRt5ypLBJPa/VgGu8hMvmycnH4pxwbKQlMQc6VzwxN WThlqKDl6fmH719Z/lQls5ffvMHd5TqZmwfR1MiQEaNgMPhKI8POEkQp4GnewBAw/93R ZQzOfOoPdy80E7+Vhy7DlS4CFyAzQoLMbuTFmQTchbtGdvwdOvBDSAt5Gwy0j0fQAnMD /pNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bw8QPyeMNO0bT9eJ6U67Ytz/lRIpuevXgnltLrWQ09A=; b=ia8F6KqLZM5vB3AdD/23hulSESArmstl/WTVGG6c4SxVV30dRxB4b/E26bwy0nbssW X8eno7ejY8UywkTcrDGGCF+2j7XH7TZyzuNi+MKP9+B7AcOHzZL5TqZXx2SuPYASt5VY WxURBjEuQ6x6RSGQJ3z5rIfVltSIDFUKEKMZaVNKy2JsRkGnxj1CHCUovp5zO90Pekfe 17ncUbgbozH6HG0tMmXEfzRC8DCEMUYe3rfT0ykVXn8ufCpeQ8X1eVtmnGjxYfD/Y+GB rrJ59dEx7lfR3w49npAeAysj+bEYqOaJzXmp4938ZKHOgq2gedLkOcOQQM/V6sNnzi5T eojA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317VIF8BTJ2LSVZ/Bd11pofrk0sVQMr6b3BI2+FUUa5nR1jbyHW w6PnpCDmtR1AIN1ctpvwnQI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHWc1941Wuram8IQMOmxvPuxtOruQV3EE9d6RBVEi8+69k158wpZ97bUn+WpR1VFNxuJroIw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:88e:: with SMTP id bj14mr36598592pjb.183.1640851408069; Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([43.132.141.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm26606987pfm.161.2021.12.30.00.03.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:03:27 -0800 (PST) From: menglong8.dong@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: imagedong@tencent.com To: kuba@kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: bpf: handle return value of post_bind{4,6} and add selftests for it Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:03:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20211230080305.1068950-1-imagedong@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org |
Series |
net: bpf: handle return value of post_bind{4,6} and add selftests for it
|
expand
|
From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com> The return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND() in __inet_bind() is not handled properly. While the return value is non-zero, it will set inet_saddr and inet_rcv_saddr to 0 and exit: exit: err = BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(sk); if (err) { inet->inet_saddr = inet->inet_rcv_saddr = 0; goto out_release_sock; } Let's take UDP for example and see what will happen. For UDP socket, it will be added to 'udp_prot.h.udp_table->hash' and 'udp_prot.h.udp_table->hash2' after the sk->sk_prot->get_port() called success. If 'inet->inet_rcv_saddr' is specified here, then 'sk' will be in the 'hslot2' of 'hash2' that it don't belong to (because inet_saddr is changed to 0), and UDP packet received will not be passed to this sock. If 'inet->inet_rcv_saddr' is not specified here, the sock will work fine, as it can receive packet properly, which is wired, as the 'bind()' is already failed. To undo the get_port() operation, introduce the 'put_port' field for 'struct proto'. For TCP proto, it is inet_put_port(); For UDP proto, it is udp_lib_unhash(); For icmp proto, it is ping_unhash(). Therefore, after sys_bind() fail caused by BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET4_POST_BIND(), it will be unbinded, which means that it can try to be binded to another port. The second patch is the selftests for this modification. Changes since v1: - introduce 'put_port' field for 'struct proto' - add selftests for it Menglong Dong (2): net: bpf: handle return value of BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET{4,6}_POST_BIND() bpf: selftests: add bind retry for post_bind{4, 6} include/net/sock.h | 1 + net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 2 + net/ipv4/ping.c | 1 + net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 1 + net/ipv4/udp.c | 1 + net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 2 + net/ipv6/ping.c | 1 + net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 1 + net/ipv6/udp.c | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 10 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)