Message ID | 20220810160840.311628-1-alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | neighbour: fix possible DoS due to net iface start/stop loop | expand |
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:08:38 +0300 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > include/net/neighbour.h | 1 + > net/core/neighbour.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) Which tree are these based on? They don't seem to apply cleanly
Hi, Jakub On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:08:38 +0300 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > include/net/neighbour.h | 1 + > > net/core/neighbour.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > Which tree are these based on? They don't seem to apply cleanly It's based on 5.19 tree, but I can easily resent it based on net-next. Regards, Alex
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:51:32 +0300 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:08:38 +0300 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > > include/net/neighbour.h | 1 + > > > net/core/neighbour.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > Which tree are these based on? They don't seem to apply cleanly > > It's based on 5.19 tree, but I can easily resent it based on net-next. netdev/net would be the most appropriate tree for a fix. Not that it differs much from net-next at this stage of the merge window.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 5:53 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:51:32 +0300 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:08:38 +0300 Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > > > > include/net/neighbour.h | 1 + > > > > net/core/neighbour.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > Which tree are these based on? They don't seem to apply cleanly > > > > It's based on 5.19 tree, but I can easily resent it based on net-next. > > netdev/net would be the most appropriate tree for a fix. > Not that it differs much from net-next at this stage of > the merge window. Yes, thanks Jakub. I'm a newbie here ;) Sorry for the inconvenience. Will rebase and send patches soon.