Message ID | 20220823222555.523590-1-sdf@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | bpf: expose bpf_{g,s}et_retval to more cgroup hooks | expand |
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>: On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:25:50 -0700 you wrote: > Apparently, only a small subset of cgroup hooks actually falls > back to cgroup_base_func_proto. This leads to unexpected result > where not all cgroup helpers have bpf_{g,s}et_retval. > > It's getting harder and harder to manage which helpers are exported > to which hooks. We now have the following call chains: > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next,v5,1/5] bpf: Introduce cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/dea6a4e17013 - [bpf-next,v5,2/5] bpf: Use cgroup_{common,current}_func_proto in more hooks https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/bed89185af0d - [bpf-next,v5,3/5] bpf: expose bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul to all program types https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8a67f2de9b1d - [bpf-next,v5,4/5] bpf: update bpf_{g,s}et_retval documentation https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2172fb8007ea - [bpf-next,v5,5/5] selftests/bpf: Make sure bpf_{g,s}et_retval is exposed everywhere https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e7215f574079 You are awesome, thank you!