From patchwork Tue Feb 14 21:14:16 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Martin Blumenstingl X-Patchwork-Id: 13140802 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7630C64EC7 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 21:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232498AbjBNVPG (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:15:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36392 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232227AbjBNVPE (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:15:04 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22DE2CFC8; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:14:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id hx15so43256014ejc.11; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:14:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KDFmcui8ALu43VCBPtA1q2U2Of2qag4CSkzmx6HWSA4=; b=flgHzDpYulGbiUGC7ZBvYRpNkA+crAorXSPnHkYw1guErjiv33o7Ceeq0hlq3uhLLO Ak4i54QTFiJX9Xl4HkGoKILoQIsXM3uyjDInoPcLY7QVpozaxv3HmPvtmLUu3LN766dY vJ66Q0H+HGarenCbzD46u7ipXtcVQvihb1QsTrLkjiu7bvPJoir93lfykT53n3RUZHGN 0HVUvuCrKHL6wn0BsmPBE9cCfapDPivoUeK+2oI5GqkpePWjdMiwjWnIywJmEmOWQmza j+vBEChNsLkkM5V9xiTSX82avDz0ovL1+vwx/ikAwkOv7SLZGAwLTThtp1RzYmYo+p00 Pkbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=KDFmcui8ALu43VCBPtA1q2U2Of2qag4CSkzmx6HWSA4=; b=K8kDTfSpsLiGVjER0Xe5rb/jAA7H+pC0qvvYvv1MDyifLK4rHwF10xndwzKldZ5HN6 InZnf8hiOBC/3aqbLdUPLzSixLoFMqu06JtAANjG45MLwpTdQxpENau/+I1GeVATCLvp dDwdj0kKqfDAhSPu4XCgHQkQ42nXiOjXeERVi8keWjt8hlYX6VYgXVa3V21INxZn5J/L CPbM5ybjZFkh+hOqp38jhmP/UYvKaQR2Amv2+mmg1fON+M1IL98xkvqXJ8TL0sggf6Vu OZYcFwwTVs5CnP+4u9CkzJZGPJbfaEOlC2DTh8Xk72IN12iLdFbCO487bD0IG5aO5NBW GouQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVTgW/sRi48kHih956wRb3d5TxY1RGH/M7Gm6oYEhzzi9gbvnJF Z8BsA0vxpiwZJGTKnkfW1PQPepqae2Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8ylAUPLXPuJEYf2pYXrU98lQN/z9azLO8/pHLkWLYD5UxXmjJ+cuk4ilGziqwKiFfUdYKyEA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c313:b0:8af:2bb3:80d7 with SMTP id s19-20020a170906c31300b008af2bb380d7mr995591ejz.31.1676409263655; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (dynamic-2a01-0c22-768e-b000-0000-0000-0000-0e63.c22.pool.telefonica.de. [2a01:c22:768e:b000::e63]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id uz2-20020a170907118200b008b134555e9fsm949806ejb.42.2023.02.14.13.14.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:14:23 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Blumenstingl To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: tony0620emma@gmail.com, kvalo@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neo Jou , Jernej Skrabec , pkshih@realtek.com, Martin Blumenstingl Subject: [PATCH v1 0/5] rtw88: Add additional SDIO support bits Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:14:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20230214211421.2290102-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org These patches are split from my big RFC series called "rtw88: Add SDIO support" from [0]. The goal of this smaller series is to make it easier to review the patches and already upstream support bits which are mostly independent. For patches 3-5 I got feedback from Ping-Ke in the RFC version where he suggested to add __packed to various structs. This resulted in discussions around that whole topic in [1] and [2]. Since I'm new to that topic I sent an RFC patch [3] based on the suggestions from Ping-Ke and David. That patch has not been reviewed yet. My suggestion is to take the patches from this series first, then come to a conclusion on the RFC patch which I'll then re-spin as a normal patch with the required changes that will come up in the discussion (if any). [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221227233020.284266-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20221228133547.633797-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/4c4551c787ee4fc9ac40b34707d7365a@AcuMS.aculab.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230108213114.547135-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com/ Martin Blumenstingl (5): wifi: rtw88: mac: Add support for the SDIO HCI in rtw_pwr_seq_parser() wifi: rtw88: mac: Add SDIO HCI support in the TX/page table setup wifi: rtw88: rtw8821c: Implement RTL8821CS (SDIO) efuse parsing wifi: rtw88: rtw8822b: Implement RTL8822BS (SDIO) efuse parsing wifi: rtw88: rtw8822c: Implement RTL8822CS (SDIO) efuse parsing drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/mac.c | 9 +++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821c.c | 9 +++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8821c.h | 6 ++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.c | 10 ++++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822b.h | 6 ++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.c | 9 +++++++++ drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8822c.h | 6 ++++++ 7 files changed, 55 insertions(+)