Message ID | 20231223104042.1432300-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 727509456 for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 10:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.93.142]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Sy0zH1c9mz4f3jXP for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:39:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF2F1A01A9 for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:39:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgCH1QvquIZljMSpEQ--.5375S4; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:39:40 +0800 (CST) From: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, houtao1@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: inline bpf_kptr_xchg() Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:40:39 +0800 Message-Id: <20231223104042.1432300-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <bpf.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:bpf+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bpf+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgCH1QvquIZljMSpEQ--.5375S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7ZF4kAr17Jw1xGr1xJr4Dtwb_yoW5JFW5pa yft343tr42qFy2kw43GwnFqa4Fvws5Wry5Xr1fAr9Yyw1DZFy8Xr1fKr4F9r9xWFWYqFyr Zr1Igr9xC3Z8tFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkFb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4 vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40E x7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x 0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IY c2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s 026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF 0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0x vE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2 jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UWE__UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: xkrx3t3r6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net |
Series | bpf: inline bpf_kptr_xchg() | expand |
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Hi, The motivation of inlining bpf_kptr_xchg() comes from the performance profiling of bpf memory allocator benchmark [1]. The benchmark uses bpf_kptr_xchg() to stash the allocated objects and to pop the stashed objects for free. After inling bpf_kptr_xchg(), the performance for object free on 8-CPUs VM increases about 2%~10%. However the performance gain comes with costs: both the kasan and kcsan checks on the pointer will be unavailable. Initially the inline is implemented in do_jit() for x86-64 directly, but I think it will more portable to implement the inline in verifier. Patch #1 supports inlining bpf_kptr_xchg() helper and enables it on x86-4. Patch #2 factors out a helper for newly-added test in patch #3. Patch #3 tests whether the inlining of bpf_kptr_xchg() is expected. Please see individual patches for more details. And comments are always welcome. Change Log: v2: * rebased on bpf-next tree * drop patch #1 in v1 due to discussion in [2] * patch #1: add the motivation in the commit message, merge patch #1 and #3 into the new patch in v2. (Daniel) * patch #2/#3: newly-added patch to test the inlining of bpf_kptr_xchg() (Eduard) v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/95b8c2cd-44d5-5fe1-60b5-7e8218779566@huaweicloud.com/ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221141501.3588586-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/fd94efb9-4a56-c982-dc2e-c66be5202cb7@huaweicloud.com/ Hou Tao (3): bpf: Support inlining bpf_kptr_xchg() helper selftests/bpf: Factor out get_xlated_program() helper selftests/bpf: Test the inlining of bpf_kptr_xchg() arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 5 ++ include/linux/filter.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/core.c | 10 ++++ kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 1 + kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 17 +++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ctx_rewrite.c | 44 ---------------- .../bpf/prog_tests/kptr_xchg_inline.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/kptr_xchg_inline.c | 28 ++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 47 +---------------- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c | 42 +++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h | 6 +++ 11 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kptr_xchg_inline.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kptr_xchg_inline.c