From patchwork Sun Mar 31 09:24:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 13612184 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 222202566; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711876970; cv=none; b=c8ADgl3O0mEyvdXEv5kdf8olHwD1iZXmbwq13n0KTyg8FuW6Q682S1khb0gilvSXsIqgrd2Sfn0D/gPdK7CVNqAupPjpkx1jNz942aqrm3AyymDs6ezhOjbui/VAbwOLLVkyWJouJ1Wch0QE/FjZNl3l+fv0SAu1LB3OgX6UqRA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711876970; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rV/AHvOmjHdNkhwP/yzt/YNZbRLk0n66Wb1p99Jyxho=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kI0WKE+tjAsGXdADG0t3I1bNCqS5EHMhD5Wg1R8/R1CEQ8sd2O4RAFLLzQLOAdHHZl8xMMLxTdz+EPQA8Pz1khZKJHld2mTYPrP7qBAWVS0jqO7Cx4LN+7S0vHhW0RalCiiMN0ac/toEr07NrV3DVPjw0a/e50KsQSLfWrLPuMA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V6pZm3JJLz4f3jHh; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 17:22:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995BD1A0DDA; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 17:22:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from ultra.huawei.com (unknown [10.90.53.71]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgCH2WtkKwlmesQWIw--.11467S2; Sun, 31 Mar 2024 17:22:44 +0800 (CST) From: Pu Lehui To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Palmer Dabbelt , Pu Lehui , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 09:24:03 +0000 Message-Id: <20240331092405.822571-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgCH2WtkKwlmesQWIw--.11467S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Jw1UWFy5Zw13CF4fJFy3XFb_yoWkuFcEkF 4rJFyfJ3yDJFWFqa4jkr15ZrZ0grWSqry2kr1DWrZ293s8Wr9FyrsY9r9rt34rXrW3WFnx XFykXFyIyw1agjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbxxFF20E14v26ryj6rWUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwACI402YVCY1x02628v n2kIc2xKxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F4 0E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_Wryl IxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxV AFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6Fyj6rWUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWU JVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUF0 eHDUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: psxovxtxl6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv calling convention [2]. Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0] Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1] Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2] Pu Lehui (2): riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline selftests/bpf: Add testcase where 7th argment is struct arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 63 +++++++++++++------ .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 19 ++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 13 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 35 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) Acked-by: Björn Töpel Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel