Message ID | 20240419082626.57225-1-c-vankar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Enable RX HW timestamp for PTP packets using CPTS FIFO | expand |
On 19/04/24 13:56, Chintan Vankar wrote: > The CPSW offers two mechanisms for communicating packet ingress timestamp > information to the host. > > The first mechanism is via the CPTS Event FIFO which records timestamp > when triggered by certain events. One such event is the reception of an > Ethernet packet with a specified EtherType field. This is used to capture > ingress timestamps for PTP packets. With this mechanism the host must > read the timestamp (from the CPTS FIFO) separately from the packet payload > which is delivered via DMA. > > In the second mechanism of timestamping, CPSW driver enables hardware > timestamping for all received packets by setting the TSTAMP_EN bit in > CPTS_CONTROL register, which directs the CPTS module to timestamp all > received packets, followed by passing timestamp via DMA descriptors. > This mechanism is responsible for triggering errata i2401: > "CPSW: Host Timestamps Cause CPSW Port to Lock up." > > The errata affects all K3 SoCs. Link to errata for AM64x: > https://www.ti.com/lit/er/sprz457h/sprz457h.pdf > > As a workaround we can use first mechanism to timestamp received > packets. > > Series is based on linux-next tagged next-20240419. > > Link to v7: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240417120913.3811519-1-c-vankar@ti.com/ > > Changes from v7 to v8: > - Removed empty lines between trailers in [PATCH v7 2/2] as suggested > by Jakub. > Is it possible to merge this series if no further comment ? > Chintan Vankar (2): > net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: Enable RX HW timestamp for PTP packets > using CPTS FIFO > net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw/ethtool: Enable RX HW timestamp only for > PTP packets > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-ethtool.c | 13 ++- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 51 +++++----- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c | 107 ++++++++++++++------ > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.h | 11 +- > 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) >
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:09:41 +0530 Chintan Vankar wrote:
> Is it possible to merge this series if no further comment ?
Perhaps you are blocked by us not merging this, yet.
In that case, to avoid sitting idly, may I politely suggest
reading the Linux kernel process documentation. Especially the part
which explains whether it's polite to ping maintainers (after less
than two work days).
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>: On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:56:24 +0530 you wrote: > The CPSW offers two mechanisms for communicating packet ingress timestamp > information to the host. > > The first mechanism is via the CPTS Event FIFO which records timestamp > when triggered by certain events. One such event is the reception of an > Ethernet packet with a specified EtherType field. This is used to capture > ingress timestamps for PTP packets. With this mechanism the host must > read the timestamp (from the CPTS FIFO) separately from the packet payload > which is delivered via DMA. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next,v8,1/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: Enable RX HW timestamp for PTP packets using CPTS FIFO https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c459f606f66d - [net-next,v8,2/2] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw/ethtool: Enable RX HW timestamp only for PTP packets https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c03a6fd39826 You are awesome, thank you!