From patchwork Wed Jul 31 21:42:48 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrii Nakryiko X-Patchwork-Id: 13749248 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A586B16CD02; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722462180; cv=none; b=r/dpi2kN2LNPnG9+W3/28shtJqkG4Ii4Ni1k6/uVFDk/cBdsNM11jTAQnSASo3xO3t8GrKGHia0H1fZ02H9DAuHYPDg+9UpFi9ffxAe823zkHNr71TLJgCMyJFsDTsUHDMmuFkSnzh30OaHnmVjMn0MgZ9s8cltJEMYejirSusg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722462180; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E2jvhnSanOgMRk5JqjTLjkM7N4NIRHzQOh015OlXJUQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IdLehxyuQdpBGS2Xor9AHBUjI2oZGFBamIM/+dHW07eLHYvG+Y6JXViV0/HKDmNIo7Fx8Ptp4sVjQLYlIGzEgKCwQrPtTj7q9YtJ2vGgm/+5br68qOH5vzYuyhpyPVkFp575nX2KI3v+PFBgOnwGelMcOWWy2d+ymc8WlfJaPjw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N9obK/gz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N9obK/gz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2228BC116B1; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:43:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722462180; bh=E2jvhnSanOgMRk5JqjTLjkM7N4NIRHzQOh015OlXJUQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=N9obK/gztkef9gk3qCnb28zYlOBbwn8cEpysXWb3Q/+ZvShCddrJF1l2V3pm1+jcE aC657mqPH3tNrLfHJI5AJttfuzBXP+HSTGO16V6CzWEBpLT5knnadnXNEJwfZ5VYre tyHWI4LaBcK+yCIZU1mBETvxblGBdhjzRtb4JbHW1IYZgUAr1jFkuDSptK7uvBQHSL oXFZPNGvwZJVv5lNiJaBP44YLsSNUW9IPsulOCRZcZZsRSctIjLQ0vTpYXz4/6qkyo 6dXRhF83IqVP/YA32m9kfUuVjYGQDOuEa4kQIGcMH0P4u/9Bd8G5UWFcnTRUL8WuO7 azazmXOlUNgIw== From: Andrii Nakryiko To: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko Subject: [PATCH 0/8] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:42:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20240731214256.3588718-1-andrii@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 This patch set is heavily inspired by Peter Zijlstra's uprobe optimization patches ([0]) and continue that work, albeit trying to keep complexity to the minimum, and attepting to reuse existing primitives as much as possible. The goal here is to optimize obvious uprobe triggering hot path, while keeping the rest of locking mostly intact. I've reused rb_find_rcu()/rb_find_add_rcu() patches as is, and the "split uprobe_unregister()" is mostly intact, but I've added uprobe_unregister_sync() into the error handling code path inside uprobe_unregister(). This is due to recent refactorings from Oleg Nesterov ([1]), which necessitates this addition. I'm not sure I got Co-Developed-by/SOB pieces right, for which I apoligize in advance. Except for refcounting change patch (which I stongly believe is a good improvement we should do and forget about quasi-refcounting schema of uprobe->consumers list), the rest of the changes are similar to Peter's initial changes in [0]. Main differences would be: - no special RCU protection for mmap and fork handling, we just stick to refcounts there, as those are infrequent and not performance-sensitive code, while being complex and thus benefiting from proper locking; - the above means we don't need to do any custom SRCU additions to handle forking code path; - I handled UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE problem in handler_chain() differently, again, leveraging existing locking scheam; - I kept refcount usage for uretprobe and single-stepping uprobes, I plan to address that in a separate follow up patches. The plan is to avoid task_work, but I need to sit down and write and test the code. - finally, I dutifully was using SRCU throughout all the changes, and only last patch switches SRCU to RCU Tasks Trace and demonstrates significant performance and scalability gains from this. The changes in this patch set were tested using BPF selftests and using uprobe-stress ([2]) tool. One recent BPF selftest (uprobe_multi/consumers), only recently added by Jiri Olsa will need a single-line adjustment to the counting logic, but the patch itself is in bpf-next/master, so we'll have to address that once linux-trace or tip and bpf-next trees merge. I'll take care of that when this happens. Now, for the benchmarking results. I've used the following script (which utilizes BPF selftests-based bench tool). The CPU used was 80-core Intel Xeon Gold 6138 CPU @ 2.00GHz running kernel with production-like config. I minimized background noise by stopping any service I could identify and stop, so results are pretty stable and variability is pretty small, overall. Benchmark script: #!/bin/bash set -eufo pipefail for i in uprobe-nop uretprobe-nop; do for p in 1 2 4 8 16 32 64; do summary=$(sudo ./bench -w3 -d5 -p$p -a trig-$i | tail -n1) total=$(echo "$summary" | cut -d'(' -f1 | cut -d' ' -f3-) percpu=$(echo "$summary" | cut -d'(' -f2 | cut -d')' -f1 | cut -d'/' -f1) printf "%-15s (%2d cpus): %s (%s/s/cpu)\n" $i $p "$total" "$percpu" done echo done With all the lock-avoiding changes done in this patch set, we get a pretty decent improvement in performance and scalability of uprobes with number of CPUs, even though we are still nowhere near linear scalability. This is due to the remaning mmap_lock, which is currently taken to resolve interrupt address to inode+offset and then uprobe instance. And, of course, uretprobes still need similar RCU to avoid refcount in the hot path, which will be addressed in the follow up patches. BASELINE (on top of Oleg's clean up patches) ============================================ uprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 3.032 ± 0.023M/s ( 3.032M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 3.452 ± 0.005M/s ( 1.726M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 3.663 ± 0.005M/s ( 0.916M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 3.718 ± 0.038M/s ( 0.465M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (16 cpus): 3.344 ± 0.008M/s ( 0.209M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (32 cpus): 2.288 ± 0.021M/s ( 0.071M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (64 cpus): 3.205 ± 0.004M/s ( 0.050M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 1.979 ± 0.005M/s ( 1.979M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 2.361 ± 0.005M/s ( 1.180M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 2.309 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.577M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 2.253 ± 0.001M/s ( 0.282M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 2.007 ± 0.000M/s ( 0.125M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 1.624 ± 0.003M/s ( 0.051M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 2.149 ± 0.001M/s ( 0.034M/s/cpu) Up to second-to-last patch (i.e., SRCU-based optimizations) =========================================================== uprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 3.276 ± 0.005M/s ( 3.276M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 4.125 ± 0.002M/s ( 2.063M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 7.713 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.928M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 8.097 ± 0.006M/s ( 1.012M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (16 cpus): 6.501 ± 0.056M/s ( 0.406M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (32 cpus): 4.398 ± 0.084M/s ( 0.137M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (64 cpus): 6.452 ± 0.000M/s ( 0.101M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 2.055 ± 0.001M/s ( 2.055M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 2.677 ± 0.000M/s ( 1.339M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 4.561 ± 0.003M/s ( 1.140M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 5.291 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.661M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 5.065 ± 0.019M/s ( 0.317M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 3.622 ± 0.003M/s ( 0.113M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 3.723 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.058M/s/cpu) RCU Tasks Trace =============== uprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 3.396 ± 0.002M/s ( 3.396M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 4.271 ± 0.006M/s ( 2.135M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 8.499 ± 0.015M/s ( 2.125M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 10.355 ± 0.028M/s ( 1.294M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (16 cpus): 7.615 ± 0.099M/s ( 0.476M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (32 cpus): 4.430 ± 0.007M/s ( 0.138M/s/cpu) uprobe-nop (64 cpus): 6.887 ± 0.020M/s ( 0.108M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 1 cpus): 2.174 ± 0.001M/s ( 2.174M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 2 cpus): 2.853 ± 0.001M/s ( 1.426M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 4 cpus): 4.913 ± 0.002M/s ( 1.228M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop ( 8 cpus): 5.883 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.735M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (16 cpus): 5.147 ± 0.001M/s ( 0.322M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (32 cpus): 3.738 ± 0.008M/s ( 0.117M/s/cpu) uretprobe-nop (64 cpus): 4.397 ± 0.002M/s ( 0.069M/s/cpu) For baseline vs SRCU, peak througput increased from 3.7 M/s (million uprobe triggerings per second) up to about 8 M/s. For uretprobes it's a bit more modest with bump from 2.4 M/s to 5 M/s. For SRCU vs RCU Tasks Trace, peak throughput for uprobes increases further from 8 M/s to 10.3 M/s (+28%!), and for uretprobes from 5.3 M/s to 5.8 M/s (+11%), as we have more work to do on uretprobes side. Even single-thread (no contention) performance is slightly better: 3.276 M/s to 3.396 M/s (+3.5%) for uprobes, and 2.055 M/s to 2.174 M/s (+5.8%) for uretprobes. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240711110235.098009979@infradead.org/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20240729134444.GA12293@redhat.com/ [2] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap/tree/uprobe-stress Andrii Nakryiko (6): uprobes: revamp uprobe refcounting and lifetime management uprobes: protected uprobe lifetime with SRCU uprobes: get rid of enum uprobe_filter_ctx in uprobe filter callbacks uprobes: travers uprobe's consumer list locklessly under SRCU protection uprobes: perform lockless SRCU-protected uprobes_tree lookup uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance Peter Zijlstra (2): rbtree: provide rb_find_rcu() / rb_find_add_rcu() perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister() include/linux/rbtree.h | 67 ++++ include/linux/uprobes.h | 20 +- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 375 ++++++++++-------- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 8 +- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 15 +- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 3 +- 6 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)