mbox series

[iwl-next,v7,0/5] igb: Add support for AF_XDP zero-copy

Message ID 20241007-b4-igb_zero_copy-v7-0-23556668adc6@linutronix.de (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series igb: Add support for AF_XDP zero-copy | expand

Message

Kurt Kanzenbach Oct. 7, 2024, 12:31 p.m. UTC
This is version v7 of the AF_XDP zero-copy support for igb. Since Sriram's
duties changed I am sending this instead. Additionally, I've tested this on
real hardware, Intel i210 [1].

Changes since v6:

 - Rebase to v6.12
 - Collect tags
 - Merged first patch via -net
 - Inline small functions (Maciej)
 - Read xdp_prog only once per NAPI cycle (Maciej)
 - Use u32 for stack based variables (Maciej)
 - Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-igb_zero_copy-v6-0-4bfb68773b18@linutronix.de

Changes since v5:

 - Rebase to 6.11
 - Fix set-but-unused variable warnings
 - Split first patches (Maciej)
 - Add READ/WRITE_ONCE() for xsk_pool and xdp_prog (Maciej)
 - Add synchronize_net() (Maciej)
 - Remove IGB_RING_FLAG_AF_XDP_ZC (Maciej)
 - Add NETDEV_XDP_ACT_XSK_ZEROCOPY to last patch (Maciej)
 - Update Rx ntc handling (Maciej)
 - Move stats update and xdp finalize to common functions (Maciej)
 - "Likelyfy" XDP_REDIRECT case (Maciej)
 - Check Tx disabled and carrier in igb_xmit_zc() (Maciej)
 - RCT (Maciej)
 - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-igb_zero_copy-v5-0-f3f455113b11@linutronix.de

Changes since v4:

 - Rebase to v6.10
 - Fix issue reported by kernel test robot
 - Provide napi_id for xdp_rxq_info_reg() so that busy polling works
 - Set olinfo_status in igb_xmit_zc() so that frames are transmitted

Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20230804084051.14194-1-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech/

[1] - https://github.com/Linutronix/TSN-Testbench/tree/main/tests/busypolling_i210

Original cover letter:

The first couple of patches adds helper funcctions to prepare for AF_XDP
zero-copy support which comes in the last couple of patches, one each
for Rx and TX paths.

As mentioned in v1 patchset [0], I don't have access to an actual IGB
device to provide correct performance numbers. I have used Intel 82576EB
emulator in QEMU [1] to test the changes to IGB driver.

The tests use one isolated vCPU for RX/TX and one isolated vCPU for the
xdp-sock application [2]. Hope these measurements provide at the least
some indication on the increase in performance when using ZC, especially
in the TX path. It would be awesome if someone with a real IGB NIC can
test the patch.

AF_XDP performance using 64 byte packets in Kpps.
Benchmark:	XDP-SKB		XDP-DRV		XDP-DRV(ZC)
rxdrop		220		235		350
txpush		1.000		1.000		410
l2fwd 		1.000		1.000		200

AF_XDP performance using 1500 byte packets in Kpps.
Benchmark:	XDP-SKB		XDP-DRV		XDP-DRV(ZC)
rxdrop		200		210		310
txpush		1.000		1.000		410
l2fwd 		0.900		1.000		160

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20230704095915.9750-1-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech/
[1]: https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/system/devices/igb.html
[2]: https://github.com/xdp-project/bpf-examples/tree/master/AF_XDP-example

v3->v4:
- NULL check buffer_info in igb_dump before dereferencing (Simon Horman)

v2->v3:
- Avoid TX unit hang when using AF_XDP zero-copy by setting time_stamp
  on the tx_buffer_info
- Fix uninitialized nb_buffs (Simon Horman)

v1->v2:
- Use batch XSK APIs (Maciej Fijalkowski)
- Follow reverse xmas tree convention and remove the ternary operator
  use (Simon Horman)

---
Sriram Yagnaraman (5):
      igb: Remove static qualifiers
      igb: Introduce igb_xdp_is_enabled()
      igb: Introduce XSK data structures and helpers
      igb: Add AF_XDP zero-copy Rx support
      igb: Add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support

 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/Makefile   |   2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h      |  57 ++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 247 ++++++++-----
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c  | 560 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 783 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 1e37963a388fe7361259f1a769cef4bac2012534
change-id: 20240711-b4-igb_zero_copy-bb70a31ecb0f

Best regards,