Message ID | 20250117151900.525509-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADCF1198845 for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737127161; cv=none; b=F+Qy2/3wkWk8WaF/mOv5hgg61YTT67sydPY8cre5ClDhlLZpEZpP1LOUsWVvgqyMYtOE/K60oKmPvFst+ukJ7l3geyedUVWc4sECT4XUxLJ56YxWC2E42lh10P9pYIgm4v1NiKP1vpjqz9BCAoCEO3W6h94x6rG0sKWmQjEO19A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737127161; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JA7xwcXMPi1Rs6xK5uK4v4vQUIVpPbUhe3Vxy6GhPok=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=MsRU+3o+E/vp51BXJlyCkLd1VChX2bbo8Otdq9Rg8BUdpxvz+qr8M6xaDPism7CgbN0NEPl8smX4p8pe05CAu2fSiJ7Pr/jQT751DxJMZzpE1h7f97QYs/qJvicB58qo4IJq83ZtxgtT3AHNfMIz+3NmBk+o4ia/OKZxRCoEfYk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cvaQMN5v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cvaQMN5v" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737127159; x=1768663159; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=JA7xwcXMPi1Rs6xK5uK4v4vQUIVpPbUhe3Vxy6GhPok=; b=cvaQMN5vAsiZ1Aq3NbOmcd/bXliZ++vTUJRJL4wCSuQN5REKYbxBuHej IytjtufmK0rVOn1ze3wWqAda/WcE8dHDJ4MSolVC4ZIrJeot3QFpayUkV nvpXwLzTFk1Srg+w4lhpFRZ66Wx6Kkh0qYndbpe78zG4qEIs7bhz3dKVJ buMSvEbdT5RngOnPeqgF57HqydMlvqsJPbLF4oqdvKiuwQmVETzNePR/6 LeT9wZ6qwqce+GuyjrO/ta4PD2j0o0Xxr49xXU0WkiPQiSCgEAyTnJNiB MZ5t1wZwD9CP2+lEROmKPJeChpEFI4dITV8VSK+6T3qOSqB1DwYIXRj9Q A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OAQJjjqdTtiJmCvh/7+ASA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KXe378slQWmGcoFfCkww/w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11318"; a="37798403" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,212,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="37798403" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2025 07:19:18 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ERw9NffvSE67rXuNSh5Vmg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ooe5vkRqSeuCea4oO6WSaA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,212,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="136664367" Received: from boxer.igk.intel.com ([10.102.20.173]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Jan 2025 07:19:15 -0800 From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, xudu@redhat.com, mschmidt@redhat.com, jmaxwell@redhat.com, poros@redhat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 intel-net 0/3] ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU traffic Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:18:57 +0100 Message-Id: <20250117151900.525509-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <netdev.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:netdev+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netdev+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org |
Series |
ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU traffic
|
expand
|
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:18:57 +0100 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v2 intel-net 0/3] ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU traffic
nit: could you use iwl-net and iwl-next as the tree names?
That's what we match on in NIPA to categorize Intel patches.