diff mbox series

[bpf-next] libbpf: replace size_t with __u32 in xsk interfaces

Message ID 1606383455-8243-1-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 105c4e75feb411a60f5089f7a1e68b8523f986cc
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] libbpf: replace size_t with __u32 in xsk interfaces | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 92 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Magnus Karlsson Nov. 26, 2020, 9:37 a.m. UTC
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Replace size_t with __u32 in the xsk interfaces that contain
this. There is no reason to have size_t since the internal variable
that is manipulated is a __u32. The following APIs are affected:

__u32 xsk_ring_prod__reserve(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, __u32 nb,
                             __u32 *idx)
void xsk_ring_prod__submit(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, __u32 nb)
__u32 xsk_ring_cons__peek(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb, __u32 *idx)
void xsk_ring_cons__cancel(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb)
void xsk_ring_cons__release(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb)

The "nb" variable and the return values have been changed from size_t
to __u32.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h | 15 ++++++---------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Nov. 27, 2020, 9:10 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:37:35 +0100 you wrote:
> From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> 
> Replace size_t with __u32 in the xsk interfaces that contain
> this. There is no reason to have size_t since the internal variable
> that is manipulated is a __u32. The following APIs are affected:
> 
> __u32 xsk_ring_prod__reserve(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, __u32 nb,
>                              __u32 *idx)
> void xsk_ring_prod__submit(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, __u32 nb)
> __u32 xsk_ring_cons__peek(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb, __u32 *idx)
> void xsk_ring_cons__cancel(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb)
> void xsk_ring_cons__release(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb)
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] libbpf: replace size_t with __u32 in xsk interfaces
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/105c4e75feb4

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h
index 1719a327e5f9..5865e082ba0b 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/xsk.h
@@ -113,8 +113,7 @@  static inline __u32 xsk_cons_nb_avail(struct xsk_ring_cons *r, __u32 nb)
 	return (entries > nb) ? nb : entries;
 }
 
-static inline size_t xsk_ring_prod__reserve(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod,
-					    size_t nb, __u32 *idx)
+static inline __u32 xsk_ring_prod__reserve(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, __u32 nb, __u32 *idx)
 {
 	if (xsk_prod_nb_free(prod, nb) < nb)
 		return 0;
@@ -125,7 +124,7 @@  static inline size_t xsk_ring_prod__reserve(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod,
 	return nb;
 }
 
-static inline void xsk_ring_prod__submit(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, size_t nb)
+static inline void xsk_ring_prod__submit(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, __u32 nb)
 {
 	/* Make sure everything has been written to the ring before indicating
 	 * this to the kernel by writing the producer pointer.
@@ -135,10 +134,9 @@  static inline void xsk_ring_prod__submit(struct xsk_ring_prod *prod, size_t nb)
 	*prod->producer += nb;
 }
 
-static inline size_t xsk_ring_cons__peek(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons,
-					 size_t nb, __u32 *idx)
+static inline __u32 xsk_ring_cons__peek(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb, __u32 *idx)
 {
-	size_t entries = xsk_cons_nb_avail(cons, nb);
+	__u32 entries = xsk_cons_nb_avail(cons, nb);
 
 	if (entries > 0) {
 		/* Make sure we do not speculatively read the data before
@@ -153,13 +151,12 @@  static inline size_t xsk_ring_cons__peek(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons,
 	return entries;
 }
 
-static inline void xsk_ring_cons__cancel(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons,
-					 size_t nb)
+static inline void xsk_ring_cons__cancel(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb)
 {
 	cons->cached_cons -= nb;
 }
 
-static inline void xsk_ring_cons__release(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, size_t nb)
+static inline void xsk_ring_cons__release(struct xsk_ring_cons *cons, __u32 nb)
 {
 	/* Make sure data has been read before indicating we are done
 	 * with the entries by updating the consumer pointer.