diff mbox series

[net,3/3] can: j1939: j1939_tp_cmd_recv(): check the dst address of TP.CM_BAM

Message ID 1634825057-47915-4-git-send-email-zhangchangzhong@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series can: j1939: fix some standard conformance problems | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 9 of 9 maintainers
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files

Commit Message

Zhang Changzhong Oct. 21, 2021, 2:04 p.m. UTC
The TP.CM_BAM message must be sent to the global address [1], so add a
check to drop TP.CM_BAM sent to a non-global address.

Without this patch, the receiver will treat the following packets as
normal RTS/CTS tranport:
18EC0102#20090002FF002301
18EB0102#0100000000000000
18EB0102#020000FFFFFFFFFF

[1] SAE-J1939-82 2015 A.3.3 Row 1.

Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
---
 net/can/j1939/transport.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Oleksij Rempel Oct. 22, 2021, 10:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:04:17PM +0800, Zhang Changzhong wrote:
> The TP.CM_BAM message must be sent to the global address [1], so add a
> check to drop TP.CM_BAM sent to a non-global address.
> 
> Without this patch, the receiver will treat the following packets as
> normal RTS/CTS tranport:
> 18EC0102#20090002FF002301
> 18EB0102#0100000000000000
> 18EB0102#020000FFFFFFFFFF
> 
> [1] SAE-J1939-82 2015 A.3.3 Row 1.
> 
> Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
> ---
>  net/can/j1939/transport.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> index 2efa606..93ec0c3 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> @@ -2019,6 +2019,8 @@ static void j1939_tp_cmd_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  		extd = J1939_ETP;
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case J1939_TP_CMD_BAM:
> +		if (!j1939_cb_is_broadcast(skcb))

Please add here netdev_err_once("with some message"), we need to know if
some MCU makes bad things.

> +			return;
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case J1939_TP_CMD_RTS:
>  		if (skcb->addr.type != extd)
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 
>
Zhang Changzhong Oct. 25, 2021, 6:59 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2021/10/22 18:28, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:04:17PM +0800, Zhang Changzhong wrote:
>> The TP.CM_BAM message must be sent to the global address [1], so add a
>> check to drop TP.CM_BAM sent to a non-global address.
>>
>> Without this patch, the receiver will treat the following packets as
>> normal RTS/CTS tranport:
>> 18EC0102#20090002FF002301
>> 18EB0102#0100000000000000
>> 18EB0102#020000FFFFFFFFFF
>>
>> [1] SAE-J1939-82 2015 A.3.3 Row 1.
>>
>> Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  net/can/j1939/transport.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
>> index 2efa606..93ec0c3 100644
>> --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
>> +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
>> @@ -2019,6 +2019,8 @@ static void j1939_tp_cmd_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  		extd = J1939_ETP;
>>  		fallthrough;
>>  	case J1939_TP_CMD_BAM:
>> +		if (!j1939_cb_is_broadcast(skcb))
> 
> Please add here netdev_err_once("with some message"), we need to know if
> some MCU makes bad things.

Ok, will do.

The current patch breaks ETP functionality as the J1939_ETP_CMD_RTS fallthrough
to J1939_TP_CMD_BAM, this will also be fixed in v2.

> 
>> +			return;
>>  		fallthrough;
>>  	case J1939_TP_CMD_RTS:
>>  		if (skcb->addr.type != extd)
>> -- 
>> 2.9.5
>>
>>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
index 2efa606..93ec0c3 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
@@ -2019,6 +2019,8 @@  static void j1939_tp_cmd_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		extd = J1939_ETP;
 		fallthrough;
 	case J1939_TP_CMD_BAM:
+		if (!j1939_cb_is_broadcast(skcb))
+			return;
 		fallthrough;
 	case J1939_TP_CMD_RTS:
 		if (skcb->addr.type != extd)