diff mbox series

[net-next,v4,12/18] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback

Message ID 1695568613-125057-13-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1342 this patch: 1342
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 12 of 12 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1363 this patch: 1363
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Wen Gu Sept. 24, 2023, 3:16 p.m. UTC
This patch implements DMB registration, unregistration and data move
operations of SMC-D loopback.

Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_cdc.c      |   6 +++
 net/smc/smc_cdc.h      |   1 +
 net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 net/smc/smc_loopback.h |  13 +++++
 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

kernel test robot Sept. 24, 2023, 11:29 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Wen,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wen-Gu/net-smc-decouple-ism_dev-from-SMC-D-device-dump/20230924-231933
base:   net-next/main
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/1695568613-125057-13-git-send-email-guwen%40linux.alibaba.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v4 12/18] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback
config: mips-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_register_dmb':
>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc'; did you mean 'kvzalloc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     102 |         dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
         |                              ^~~~~~~
         |                              kvzalloc
>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:28: warning: assignment to 'void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
     102 |         dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
         |                            ^
   net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_unregister_dmb':
>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:159:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree'; did you mean 'kvfree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     159 |         vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
         |         ^~~~~
         |         kvfree
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +102 net/smc/smc_loopback.c

    79	
    80	static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
    81				       void *client_priv)
    82	{
    83		struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node;
    84		struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
    85		int sba_idx, rc;
    86	
    87		/* check space for new dmb */
    88		for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) {
    89			if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask))
    90				break;
    91		}
    92		if (sba_idx == SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS)
    93			return -ENOSPC;
    94	
    95		dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL);
    96		if (!dmb_node) {
    97			rc = -ENOMEM;
    98			goto err_bit;
    99		}
   100	
   101		dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx;
 > 102		dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
   103		if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) {
   104			rc = -ENOMEM;
   105			goto err_node;
   106		}
   107		dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
   108		dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
   109	
   110	again:
   111		/* add new dmb into hash table */
   112		get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token));
   113		write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
   114		hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) {
   115			if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) {
   116				write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
   117				goto again;
   118			}
   119		}
   120		hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
   121		write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
   122	
   123		dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
   124		dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
   125		dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
   126		dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
   127		dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
   128	
   129		return 0;
   130	
   131	err_node:
   132		kfree(dmb_node);
   133	err_bit:
   134		clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
   135		return rc;
   136	}
   137	
   138	static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
   139	{
   140		struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
   141		struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
   142	
   143		/* remove dmb from hash table */
   144		write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
   145		hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
   146			if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
   147				dmb_node = tmp_node;
   148				break;
   149			}
   150		}
   151		if (!dmb_node) {
   152			write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
   153			return -EINVAL;
   154		}
   155		hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
   156		write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
   157	
   158		clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
 > 159		vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
   160		kfree(dmb_node);
   161	
   162		return 0;
   163	}
   164
Wen Gu Sept. 25, 2023, 1:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2023/9/25 07:29, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Wen,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wen-Gu/net-smc-decouple-ism_dev-from-SMC-D-device-dump/20230924-231933
> base:   net-next/main
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/1695568613-125057-13-git-send-email-guwen%40linux.alibaba.com
> patch subject: [PATCH net-next v4 12/18] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback
> config: mips-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>     net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_register_dmb':
>>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc'; did you mean 'kvzalloc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       102 |         dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
>           |                              ^~~~~~~
>           |                              kvzalloc
>>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:28: warning: assignment to 'void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>       102 |         dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
>           |                            ^
>     net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_unregister_dmb':
>>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:159:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree'; did you mean 'kvfree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       159 |         vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
>           |         ^~~~~
>           |         kvfree
>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 

It can be fixed by including corresponding header file:

#include <linux/vmalloc.h>


Continue to wait for other review comments and will fix this in the next version.

Thanks.

> 
> vim +102 net/smc/smc_loopback.c
> 
>      79	
>      80	static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
>      81				       void *client_priv)
>      82	{
>      83		struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node;
>      84		struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
>      85		int sba_idx, rc;
>      86	
>      87		/* check space for new dmb */
>      88		for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) {
>      89			if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask))
>      90				break;
>      91		}
>      92		if (sba_idx == SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS)
>      93			return -ENOSPC;
>      94	
>      95		dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL);
>      96		if (!dmb_node) {
>      97			rc = -ENOMEM;
>      98			goto err_bit;
>      99		}
>     100	
>     101		dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx;
>   > 102		dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
>     103		if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) {
>     104			rc = -ENOMEM;
>     105			goto err_node;
>     106		}
>     107		dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
>     108		dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
>     109	
>     110	again:
>     111		/* add new dmb into hash table */
>     112		get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token));
>     113		write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
>     114		hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) {
>     115			if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) {
>     116				write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
>     117				goto again;
>     118			}
>     119		}
>     120		hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
>     121		write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
>     122	
>     123		dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
>     124		dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
>     125		dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
>     126		dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
>     127		dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
>     128	
>     129		return 0;
>     130	
>     131	err_node:
>     132		kfree(dmb_node);
>     133	err_bit:
>     134		clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
>     135		return rc;
>     136	}
>     137	
>     138	static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
>     139	{
>     140		struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
>     141		struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
>     142	
>     143		/* remove dmb from hash table */
>     144		write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
>     145		hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
>     146			if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
>     147				dmb_node = tmp_node;
>     148				break;
>     149			}
>     150		}
>     151		if (!dmb_node) {
>     152			write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
>     153			return -EINVAL;
>     154		}
>     155		hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
>     156		write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
>     157	
>     158		clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
>   > 159		vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
>     160		kfree(dmb_node);
>     161	
>     162		return 0;
>     163	}
>     164	
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
index 89105e9..2641800 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
@@ -411,6 +411,12 @@  static void smc_cdc_msg_recv(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_cdc_msg *cdc)
 static void smcd_cdc_rx_tsklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
 	struct smc_connection *conn = from_tasklet(conn, t, rx_tsklet);
+
+	smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn);
+}
+
+void smcd_cdc_rx_handler(struct smc_connection *conn)
+{
 	struct smcd_cdc_msg *data_cdc;
 	struct smcd_cdc_msg cdc;
 	struct smc_sock *smc;
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
index 696cc11..11559d4 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h
@@ -301,5 +301,6 @@  int smcr_cdc_msg_send_validation(struct smc_connection *conn,
 				 struct smc_wr_buf *wr_buf);
 int smc_cdc_init(void) __init;
 void smcd_cdc_rx_init(struct smc_connection *conn);
+void smcd_cdc_rx_handler(struct smc_connection *conn);
 
 #endif /* SMC_CDC_H */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
index 4341803..eb13291 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c
@@ -16,11 +16,13 @@ 
 #include <linux/smc.h>
 #include <net/smc.h>
 
+#include "smc_cdc.h"
 #include "smc_ism.h"
 #include "smc_loopback.h"
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_LO)
 #define SMC_LO_SUPPORTS_V2	0x1 /* SMC-D loopback supports SMC-Dv2 */
+#define SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID	(~(dma_addr_t)0)
 
 static const char smc_lo_dev_name[] = "smc_lo";
 static struct smcd_seid SMC_LO_SEID = {
@@ -75,6 +77,91 @@  static int smc_lo_query_rgid(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_gid *rgid,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb,
+			       void *client_priv)
+{
+	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node;
+	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+	int sba_idx, rc;
+
+	/* check space for new dmb */
+	for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) {
+		if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask))
+			break;
+	}
+	if (sba_idx == SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS)
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dmb_node) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_bit;
+	}
+
+	dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx;
+	dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len);
+	if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) {
+		rc = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_node;
+	}
+	dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len;
+	dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
+
+again:
+	/* add new dmb into hash table */
+	get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token));
+	write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) {
+		if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) {
+			write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+			goto again;
+		}
+	}
+	hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token);
+	write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+	dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx;
+	dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token;
+	dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr;
+	dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr;
+	dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_node:
+	kfree(dmb_node);
+err_bit:
+	clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
+	return rc;
+}
+
+static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb)
+{
+	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+	/* remove dmb from hash table */
+	write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) {
+		if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) {
+			dmb_node = tmp_node;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!dmb_node) {
+		write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	hash_del(&dmb_node->list);
+	write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+	clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask);
+	vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr);
+	kfree(dmb_node);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int smc_lo_add_vlan_id(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 vlan_id)
 {
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -101,6 +188,38 @@  static int smc_lo_signal_event(struct smcd_dev *dev, struct smcd_gid *rgid,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok, unsigned int idx,
+			    bool sf, unsigned int offset, void *data,
+			    unsigned int size)
+{
+	struct smc_lo_dmb_node *rmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node;
+	struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv;
+
+	read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) {
+		if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) {
+			rmb_node = tmp_node;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!rmb_node) {
+		read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+
+	memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size);
+
+	if (sf) {
+		struct smc_connection *conn =
+			smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx];
+
+		if (conn && !conn->killed)
+			smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int smc_lo_supports_v2(void)
 {
 	return SMC_LO_SUPPORTS_V2;
@@ -132,14 +251,14 @@  static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
 
 static const struct smcd_ops lo_ops = {
 	.query_remote_gid = smc_lo_query_rgid,
-	.register_dmb		= NULL,
-	.unregister_dmb		= NULL,
+	.register_dmb = smc_lo_register_dmb,
+	.unregister_dmb = smc_lo_unregister_dmb,
 	.add_vlan_id = smc_lo_add_vlan_id,
 	.del_vlan_id = smc_lo_del_vlan_id,
 	.set_vlan_required = smc_lo_set_vlan_required,
 	.reset_vlan_required = smc_lo_reset_vlan_required,
 	.signal_event = smc_lo_signal_event,
-	.move_data		= NULL,
+	.move_data = smc_lo_move_data,
 	.supports_v2 = smc_lo_supports_v2,
 	.get_system_eid = smc_lo_get_system_eid,
 	.get_local_gid = smc_lo_get_local_gid,
@@ -213,6 +332,8 @@  static void smc_lo_dev_release(struct device *dev)
 static int smc_lo_dev_init(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev)
 {
 	smc_lo_generate_id(ldev);
+	rwlock_init(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock);
+	hash_init(ldev->dmb_ht);
 
 	return smcd_lo_register_dev(ldev);
 }
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
index 71a52da..a5b501b 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h
@@ -21,12 +21,25 @@ 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_LO)
 #define SMC_LO_CHID 0xFFFF
 #define SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS 5000
+#define SMC_LODEV_DMBS_HASH_BITS 12
+
+struct smc_lo_dmb_node {
+	struct hlist_node list;
+	u64 token;
+	u32 len;
+	u32 sba_idx;
+	void *cpu_addr;
+	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+};
 
 struct smc_lo_dev {
 	struct smcd_dev *smcd;
 	struct device dev;
 	u16 chid;
 	struct smcd_gid local_gid;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS);
+	rwlock_t dmb_ht_lock;
+	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(dmb_ht, SMC_LODEV_DMBS_HASH_BITS);
 };
 #endif