| Message ID | 1729737768-124596-5-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net/smc: Introduce smc_bpf_ops | expand |
On 10/24/24 10:42 AM, D. Wythe wrote: > From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> > > This PATCH adds a tiny selftest for bpf_smc_ops, to verify the ability > to attach and write access. > > Follow the steps below to run this test. > > make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf > cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf > sudo ./test_progs -t smc > > Results shows: > Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Sorry for just found an issue with vary config. I will fix this issues in the next version. D. Wythe
On 2024/10/24 12:04, D. Wythe wrote: > > > On 10/24/24 10:42 AM, D. Wythe wrote: >> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> >> >> This PATCH adds a tiny selftest for bpf_smc_ops, to verify the ability >> to attach and write access. >> >> Follow the steps below to run this test. >> >> make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf >> cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf >> sudo ./test_progs -t smc >> >> Results shows: >> Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED > > > Sorry for just found an issue with vary config. I will fix this issues > in the next version. > > D. Wythe This doesn't build with !CONFIG_SMC. Maybe you should create an individual dir. (like what sched_ext does)
On 10/24/24 12:49 PM, Tianchen Ding wrote: > On 2024/10/24 12:04, D. Wythe wrote: >> >> >> On 10/24/24 10:42 AM, D. Wythe wrote: >>> From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> >>> >>> This PATCH adds a tiny selftest for bpf_smc_ops, to verify the ability >>> to attach and write access. >>> >>> Follow the steps below to run this test. >>> >>> make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf >>> cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf >>> sudo ./test_progs -t smc >>> >>> Results shows: >>> Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED >> >> >> Sorry for just found an issue with vary config. I will fix this issues >> in the next version. >> >> D. Wythe > > This doesn't build with !CONFIG_SMC. > > Maybe you should create an individual dir. (like what sched_ext does) It's true, I do intend to create an individual dir, and send the patches for BPF and SMC separately. Thanks for your advises. Best wishes, D. Wythe
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000..2299853 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <test_progs.h> + +#include "bpf_smc.skel.h" + +static void load(void) +{ + struct bpf_smc *skel; + + skel = bpf_smc__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_smc__open_and_load")) + return; + + bpf_smc__destroy(skel); +} + +void test_bpf_smc(void) +{ + if (test__start_subtest("load")) + load(); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ebff477 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include "vmlinux.h" + +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +struct smc_bpf_ops_ctx { + struct { + struct tcp_sock *tp; + } set_option; + struct { + const struct tcp_sock *tp; + struct inet_request_sock *ireq; + int smc_ok; + } set_option_cond; +}; + +struct smc_bpf_ops { + void (*set_option)(struct smc_bpf_ops_ctx *ctx); + void (*set_option_cond)(struct smc_bpf_ops_ctx *ctx); +}; + +SEC("struct_ops/bpf_smc_set_tcp_option_cond") +void BPF_PROG(bpf_smc_set_tcp_option_cond, struct smc_bpf_ops_ctx *arg) +{ + arg->set_option_cond.smc_ok = 1; +} + +SEC("struct_ops/bpf_smc_set_tcp_option") +void BPF_PROG(bpf_smc_set_tcp_option, struct smc_bpf_ops_ctx *arg) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = arg->set_option.tp; + + tp->syn_smc = 1; +} + +SEC(".struct_ops.link") +struct smc_bpf_ops sample_smc_bpf_ops = { + .set_option = (void *) bpf_smc_set_tcp_option, + .set_option_cond = (void *) bpf_smc_set_tcp_option_cond, +};