diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpf: Add MAINTAINERS entry for BPF LSM

Message ID 20201125202404.1419509-1-kpsingh@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpf: Add MAINTAINERS entry for BPF LSM | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 17 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

KP Singh Nov. 25, 2020, 8:24 p.m. UTC
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>

Similar to XDP and some JITs, also added Brendan and Florent who have
been reviewing all my patches internally as reviewers. The patches are
still expected to go via the BPF tree / list / merge workflows.

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov Nov. 25, 2020, 8:53 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:24 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
>
> Similar to XDP and some JITs, also added Brendan and Florent who have
> been reviewing all my patches internally as reviewers. The patches are
> still expected to go via the BPF tree / list / merge workflows.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index af9f6a3ab100..09c902bee5d2 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3366,6 +3366,17 @@ S:       Supported
>  F:     arch/x86/net/
>  X:     arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
>
> +BPF LSM (Security Audit and Enforcement using eBPF)
> +M:     KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
> +R:     Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
> +R:     Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org>
> +L:     bpf@vger.kernel.org
> +S:     Maintained
> +F:     Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
> +F:     include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> +F:     kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> +F:     security/bpf/

I'm not sure what's the value of the additional entry.
bpf has many different components. This is just one of them.
Your maintainer of bpf_lsm responsibilities stay the same
regardless of the entry in the file.
KP Singh Nov. 25, 2020, 8:57 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 9:53 PM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 12:24 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> >
> > Similar to XDP and some JITs, also added Brendan and Florent who have
> > been reviewing all my patches internally as reviewers. The patches are
> > still expected to go via the BPF tree / list / merge workflows.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index af9f6a3ab100..09c902bee5d2 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -3366,6 +3366,17 @@ S:       Supported
> >  F:     arch/x86/net/
> >  X:     arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> >
> > +BPF LSM (Security Audit and Enforcement using eBPF)
> > +M:     KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
> > +R:     Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
> > +R:     Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org>
> > +L:     bpf@vger.kernel.org
> > +S:     Maintained
> > +F:     Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
> > +F:     include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> > +F:     kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> > +F:     security/bpf/
>
> I'm not sure what's the value of the additional entry.

I think it's better to add Brendan and Florent as reviewers for the LSM
bits but not the overall BPF stuff (for now). We can also keep
any tools/bpf stuff we add for LSM (at least initially) listed here.

> bpf has many different components. This is just one of them.
> Your maintainer of bpf_lsm responsibilities stay the same
> regardless of the entry in the file.

I do understand this does not entail any change in responsibilities
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index af9f6a3ab100..09c902bee5d2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3366,6 +3366,17 @@  S:	Supported
 F:	arch/x86/net/
 X:	arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
 
+BPF LSM (Security Audit and Enforcement using eBPF)
+M:	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
+R:	Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
+R:	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org>
+L:	bpf@vger.kernel.org
+S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
+F:	include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
+F:	kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+F:	security/bpf/
+
 BROADCOM B44 10/100 ETHERNET DRIVER
 M:	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
 L:	netdev@vger.kernel.org