diff mbox series

[net,v4] lan743x: fix rx_napi_poll/interrupt ping-pong

Message ID 20201215161954.5950-1-TheSven73@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net,v4] lan743x: fix rx_napi_poll/interrupt ping-pong | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 91 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Sven Van Asbroeck Dec. 15, 2020, 4:19 p.m. UTC 
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>

Even if there is more rx data waiting on the chip, the rx napi poll fn
will never run more than once - it will always read a few buffers, then
bail out and re-arm interrupts. Which results in ping-pong between napi
and interrupt.

This defeats the purpose of napi, and is bad for performance.

Fix by making the rx napi poll behave identically to other ethernet
drivers:
1. initialize rx napi polling with an arbitrary budget (64).
2. in the polling fn, return full weight if rx queue is not depleted,
   this tells the napi core to "keep polling".
3. update the rx tail ("ring the doorbell") once for every 8 processed
   rx ring buffers.

Thanks to Jakub Kicinski, Eric Dumazet and Andrew Lunn for their expert
opinions and suggestions.

Tested with 20 seconds of full bandwidth receive (iperf3):
        rx irqs      softirqs(NET_RX)
        -----------------------------
before  23827        33620
after   129          4081

Tested-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> # lan7430
Fixes: 23f0703c125be ("lan743x: Add main source files for new lan743x driver")
Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
---

v3 -> v4:
	- eliminate potential undefined behaviour in corner case
	  (if weight == 0)

v2 -> v3:
	- use NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT
	  (Heiner Kallweit)

v1 -> v2:
	- make napi rx polling behave identically to existing ethernet drivers
	  (Jacub Kicinski, Eric Dumazet, Andrew Lunn)

Tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git # 7f376f1917d7

To: Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@microchip.com>
To: Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

 drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c | 43 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski Dec. 16, 2020, 5:03 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:19:54 -0500 Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
> 
> Even if there is more rx data waiting on the chip, the rx napi poll fn
> will never run more than once - it will always read a few buffers, then
> bail out and re-arm interrupts. Which results in ping-pong between napi
> and interrupt.
> 
> This defeats the purpose of napi, and is bad for performance.
> 
> Fix by making the rx napi poll behave identically to other ethernet
> drivers:
> 1. initialize rx napi polling with an arbitrary budget (64).
> 2. in the polling fn, return full weight if rx queue is not depleted,
>    this tells the napi core to "keep polling".
> 3. update the rx tail ("ring the doorbell") once for every 8 processed
>    rx ring buffers.
> 
> Thanks to Jakub Kicinski, Eric Dumazet and Andrew Lunn for their expert
> opinions and suggestions.
> 
> Tested with 20 seconds of full bandwidth receive (iperf3):
>         rx irqs      softirqs(NET_RX)
>         -----------------------------
> before  23827        33620
> after   129          4081
> 
> Tested-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com> # lan7430
> Fixes: 23f0703c125be ("lan743x: Add main source files for new lan743x driver")
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>

Applied, thanks Sven.

I'll leave it out of our stable submission, and expect Sasha's
autoselection bot to pick it up. This should give us more time 
for testing before the patch makes its way to stable trees. 
Let's see how this idea works out for us in practice.
Sven Van Asbroeck Dec. 16, 2020, 5:38 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Jakub,

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:03 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Applied, thanks Sven.
>
> I'll leave it out of our stable submission, and expect Sasha's
> autoselection bot to pick it up. This should give us more time
> for testing before the patch makes its way to stable trees.
> Let's see how this idea works out for us in practice.

Thank you !

While I believe that this patch is sound, I can also understand
your caution: it's not a simple bug-fix, and I also don't
have the opportunity to test this on x86.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
index b319c22c211c..8947c3a62810 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_main.c
@@ -1962,6 +1962,14 @@  static struct sk_buff *lan743x_rx_allocate_skb(struct lan743x_rx *rx)
 				  length, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
 }
 
+static void lan743x_rx_update_tail(struct lan743x_rx *rx, int index)
+{
+	/* update the tail once per 8 descriptors */
+	if ((index & 7) == 7)
+		lan743x_csr_write(rx->adapter, RX_TAIL(rx->channel_number),
+				  index);
+}
+
 static int lan743x_rx_init_ring_element(struct lan743x_rx *rx, int index,
 					struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -1992,6 +2000,7 @@  static int lan743x_rx_init_ring_element(struct lan743x_rx *rx, int index,
 	descriptor->data0 = (RX_DESC_DATA0_OWN_ |
 			    (length & RX_DESC_DATA0_BUF_LENGTH_MASK_));
 	skb_reserve(buffer_info->skb, RX_HEAD_PADDING);
+	lan743x_rx_update_tail(rx, index);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2010,6 +2019,7 @@  static void lan743x_rx_reuse_ring_element(struct lan743x_rx *rx, int index)
 	descriptor->data0 = (RX_DESC_DATA0_OWN_ |
 			    ((buffer_info->buffer_length) &
 			    RX_DESC_DATA0_BUF_LENGTH_MASK_));
+	lan743x_rx_update_tail(rx, index);
 }
 
 static void lan743x_rx_release_ring_element(struct lan743x_rx *rx, int index)
@@ -2220,6 +2230,7 @@  static int lan743x_rx_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int weight)
 {
 	struct lan743x_rx *rx = container_of(napi, struct lan743x_rx, napi);
 	struct lan743x_adapter *adapter = rx->adapter;
+	int result = RX_PROCESS_RESULT_NOTHING_TO_DO;
 	u32 rx_tail_flags = 0;
 	int count;
 
@@ -2228,27 +2239,19 @@  static int lan743x_rx_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int weight)
 		lan743x_csr_write(adapter, DMAC_INT_STS,
 				  DMAC_INT_BIT_RXFRM_(rx->channel_number));
 	}
-	count = 0;
-	while (count < weight) {
-		int rx_process_result = lan743x_rx_process_packet(rx);
-
-		if (rx_process_result == RX_PROCESS_RESULT_PACKET_RECEIVED) {
-			count++;
-		} else if (rx_process_result ==
-			RX_PROCESS_RESULT_NOTHING_TO_DO) {
+	for (count = 0; count < weight; count++) {
+		result = lan743x_rx_process_packet(rx);
+		if (result == RX_PROCESS_RESULT_NOTHING_TO_DO)
 			break;
-		} else if (rx_process_result ==
-			RX_PROCESS_RESULT_PACKET_DROPPED) {
-			continue;
-		}
 	}
 	rx->frame_count += count;
-	if (count == weight)
-		goto done;
+	if (count == weight || result == RX_PROCESS_RESULT_PACKET_RECEIVED)
+		return weight;
 
 	if (!napi_complete_done(napi, count))
-		goto done;
+		return count;
 
+	/* re-arm interrupts, must write to rx tail on some chip variants */
 	if (rx->vector_flags & LAN743X_VECTOR_FLAG_VECTOR_ENABLE_AUTO_SET)
 		rx_tail_flags |= RX_TAIL_SET_TOP_INT_VEC_EN_;
 	if (rx->vector_flags & LAN743X_VECTOR_FLAG_SOURCE_ENABLE_AUTO_SET) {
@@ -2258,10 +2261,10 @@  static int lan743x_rx_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int weight)
 				  INT_BIT_DMA_RX_(rx->channel_number));
 	}
 
-	/* update RX_TAIL */
-	lan743x_csr_write(adapter, RX_TAIL(rx->channel_number),
-			  rx_tail_flags | rx->last_tail);
-done:
+	if (rx_tail_flags)
+		lan743x_csr_write(adapter, RX_TAIL(rx->channel_number),
+				  rx_tail_flags | rx->last_tail);
+
 	return count;
 }
 
@@ -2405,7 +2408,7 @@  static int lan743x_rx_open(struct lan743x_rx *rx)
 
 	netif_napi_add(adapter->netdev,
 		       &rx->napi, lan743x_rx_napi_poll,
-		       rx->ring_size - 1);
+		       NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT);
 
 	lan743x_csr_write(adapter, DMAC_CMD,
 			  DMAC_CMD_RX_SWR_(rx->channel_number));