From patchwork Wed Dec 16 06:48:07 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 11976751 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12BDC4361B for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A532337F for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726076AbgLPGvG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 01:51:06 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:46572 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726062AbgLPGvF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 01:51:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1608101378; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ziqdhg3Ply9fENsVm5Em6CyO6Z4ll+1ewm9A2bIY6MA=; b=eBLFe1HxK+uOScpIufOM9LVGzIdvQvJ/3Y51H5uiJpx+zL0lPF5aVd7PXCJlStjJ230R3e F1YBYr3nuLKV+tWkSH02XKcDvG6yFe6iLPtaui0cqzFUTG6jIDA5IrBK2hkoqKueW6Xc4O NreBus2GmNNw2z2KWhs+ZuncPXyDMl8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-33-5n3tSKaEMeCbSOBOL3qcwQ-1; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 01:49:37 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 5n3tSKaEMeCbSOBOL3qcwQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93501107ACE4; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jason-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-6th.redhat.com (ovpn-12-210.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.210]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864A210013C1; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 06:49:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Jason Wang To: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com Cc: eperezma@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lulu@redhat.com, eli@mellanox.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com, stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH 10/21] vhost: support ASID in IOTLB API Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:48:07 +0800 Message-Id: <20201216064818.48239-11-jasowang@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201216064818.48239-1-jasowang@redhat.com> References: <20201216064818.48239-1-jasowang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org This patches allows userspace to send ASID based IOTLB message to vhost. This idea is to use the reserved u32 field in the existing V2 IOTLB message. Vhost device should advertise this capability via VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID backend feature. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang --- drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 5 ++++- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++----- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ++-- include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h | 5 ++++- 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c index 03a9b3311c6c..feb6a58df22d 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_update(struct vhost_vdpa *v, return ret; } -static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, +static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, u32 asid, struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg) { struct vhost_vdpa *v = container_of(dev, struct vhost_vdpa, vdev); @@ -748,6 +748,9 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb = v->iotlb; int r = 0; + if (asid != 0) + return -EINVAL; + r = vhost_dev_check_owner(dev); if (r) return r; diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index a262e12c6dc2..7477b724c29b 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs, int iov_limit, int weight, int byte_weight, bool use_worker, - int (*msg_handler)(struct vhost_dev *dev, + int (*msg_handler)(struct vhost_dev *dev, u32 asid, struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)) { struct vhost_virtqueue *vq; @@ -1084,11 +1084,14 @@ static bool umem_access_ok(u64 uaddr, u64 size, int access) return true; } -static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, +static int vhost_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, u16 asid, struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg) { int ret = 0; + if (asid != 0) + return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&dev->mutex); vhost_dev_lock_vqs(dev); switch (msg->type) { @@ -1135,6 +1138,7 @@ ssize_t vhost_chr_write_iter(struct vhost_dev *dev, struct vhost_iotlb_msg msg; size_t offset; int type, ret; + u16 asid = 0; ret = copy_from_iter(&type, sizeof(type), from); if (ret != sizeof(type)) { @@ -1150,7 +1154,16 @@ ssize_t vhost_chr_write_iter(struct vhost_dev *dev, offset = offsetof(struct vhost_msg, iotlb) - sizeof(int); break; case VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2: - offset = sizeof(__u32); + if (vhost_backend_has_feature(dev->vqs[0], + VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID)) { + ret = copy_from_iter(&asid, sizeof(asid), from); + if (ret != sizeof(asid)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto done; + } + offset = sizeof(__u16); + } else + offset = sizeof(__u32); break; default: ret = -EINVAL; @@ -1165,9 +1178,9 @@ ssize_t vhost_chr_write_iter(struct vhost_dev *dev, } if (dev->msg_handler) - ret = dev->msg_handler(dev, &msg); + ret = dev->msg_handler(dev, asid, &msg); else - ret = vhost_process_iotlb_msg(dev, &msg); + ret = vhost_process_iotlb_msg(dev, asid, &msg); if (ret) { ret = -EFAULT; goto done; diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h index b063324c7669..19753a90875c 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ struct vhost_dev { int byte_weight; u64 kcov_handle; bool use_worker; - int (*msg_handler)(struct vhost_dev *dev, + int (*msg_handler)(struct vhost_dev *dev, u32 asid, struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg); }; @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ bool vhost_exceeds_weight(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int pkts, int total_len); void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *, struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs, int iov_limit, int weight, int byte_weight, bool use_worker, - int (*msg_handler)(struct vhost_dev *dev, + int (*msg_handler)(struct vhost_dev *dev, u32 asid, struct vhost_iotlb_msg *msg)); long vhost_dev_set_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev); bool vhost_dev_has_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev); diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h index 76ee7016c501..222fc66ce2ac 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vhost_types.h @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct vhost_msg { struct vhost_msg_v2 { __u32 type; - __u32 reserved; + __u32 asid; union { struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb; __u8 padding[64]; @@ -157,5 +157,8 @@ struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range { #define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 0x1 /* IOTLB can accept batching hints */ #define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_BATCH 0x2 +/* IOTLB can accept address space identifier through V2 type of IOTLB + message */ +#define VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID 0x3 #endif