diff mbox series

[v4,net-next,04/11] net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now

Message ID 20210109000156.1246735-5-olteanv@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit cf6def51badebbacaedd3999a4d94761197e18b4
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Get rid of the switchdev transactional model | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: jiri@resnulli.us linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org matthias.bgg@gmail.com linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 35 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1
netdev/header_inline success Link
netdev/stable success Stable not CCed

Commit Message

Vladimir Oltean Jan. 9, 2021, 12:01 a.m. UTC 
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

After the removal of the transactional model inside
switchdev_port_obj_add_now, it has no added value and we can just call
switchdev_port_obj_notify directly, bypassing this function. Let's
delete it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
---
Changes in v4:
None.

Changes in v3:
None.

Changes in v2:
None.

 net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
index a575bb33ee6c..3509d362056d 100644
--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
@@ -242,23 +242,15 @@  static int switchdev_port_obj_notify(enum switchdev_notifier_type nt,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int switchdev_port_obj_add_now(struct net_device *dev,
-				      const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
-				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
-{
-	ASSERT_RTNL();
-
-	return switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
-					 dev, obj, extack);
-}
-
 static void switchdev_port_obj_add_deferred(struct net_device *dev,
 					    const void *data)
 {
 	const struct switchdev_obj *obj = data;
 	int err;
 
-	err = switchdev_port_obj_add_now(dev, obj, NULL);
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+	err = switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
+					dev, obj, NULL);
 	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
 		netdev_err(dev, "failed (err=%d) to add object (id=%d)\n",
 			   err, obj->id);
@@ -290,7 +282,8 @@  int switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
 	if (obj->flags & SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER)
 		return switchdev_port_obj_add_defer(dev, obj);
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
-	return switchdev_port_obj_add_now(dev, obj, extack);
+	return switchdev_port_obj_notify(SWITCHDEV_PORT_OBJ_ADD,
+					 dev, obj, extack);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switchdev_port_obj_add);