From patchwork Tue Jan 26 01:11:07 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wei Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 12048157 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-26.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BE7C433DB for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D445622A83 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727270AbhAZFbv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:31:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47074 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727700AbhAZBbd (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:31:33 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x549.google.com (mail-pg1-x549.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::549]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B3B2C061A31 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:11:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x549.google.com with SMTP id f16so1970691pgh.3 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:11:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=8vibuuj1dKsMOvwlhBBf+nTr0uc0591aLFH4MSVjWJs=; b=vylLPnbqG6mOcGEHqzPYtqA7BjxA2mni15PJJ+Z795mgss1XnvQMYmGWhQWMA4vLHW S88EPl1wzL2fYB0mT+Ajt8uhgN7zEgpkkHuj8jz7HR5OnqmtrqE13rYCw0XDGVyaIRS6 6roBpcjMjdRaI+XAiM3oK4XdFTHzgqzpt6rC5WxjE9uDEnLf6bLdY1ZyMs0ErazXTFPv +gBmGQxwxa7A3o71AHmrjyjYYP8+zUViRQCTsWRYSHo2pj12gxPGbebF4IUttuTv+Ffh xvo6vp8VH426PiY7bgxI1kF16sgO5wCpvw/avvYIu4d8MdOBesBfDaF8C2PMhyqwaO1z 1WVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=8vibuuj1dKsMOvwlhBBf+nTr0uc0591aLFH4MSVjWJs=; b=EtBc/d8ZhCny0z+Sa+nmbAN43OtvwZ8WJb1ZkavdQQxhwig0dh8KMeCGmknv5/nzWY GqHEJgP91x871Dh94o/yiS+VTOoWGbLtHBxKgMzWXrzyJBTHAPNBtRKhKaNAA1Wz4979 e9To6mUL4f4fWScPlgf8dcepg90x7wC9wxrRl/L9NsgmZKWRMelS4urv//nagkeOqzuh 9mfT3ieK9zPOkW1kvpPytV2OG68tK2pQu49zFhByd16tbVuNE2uXMdrc53GGMtAtk2KX efPZDtBJ8fbf9fGGRuW9BOEi4RWFr5ZaPg68OtJJ6vSqZLzfhNDjRi5VhSDm7jCB5I49 ghWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KCoxUgbnWfNsCwYU+vFuXtAr+ZMfVf1BckeWGZv10oqRn+fv/ hneavM409wH5FQnbiOLH7U6H053DsVc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUP2LYKoYaBIZWWk2MDu1iHgNaWZO8QvbsMzZ52Jan8Z6soHKg4n/V3y3sAjDGm4RjwKj6/ufefLI= Sender: "weiwan via sendgmr" X-Received: from weiwan.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2c4:201:1ea0:b8ff:fe75:cf08]) (user=weiwan job=sendgmr) by 2002:a63:da17:: with SMTP id c23mr3178197pgh.348.1611623473076; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:11:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 17:11:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20210126011109.2425966-1-weiwan@google.com> Message-Id: <20210126011109.2425966-2-weiwan@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210126011109.2425966-1-weiwan@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0.280.ga3ce27912f-goog Subject: [PATCH net-next v8 1/3] net: extract napi poll functionality to __napi_poll() From: Wei Wang To: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski Cc: Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Felix Fietkau , Alexander Duyck Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: Felix Fietkau This commit introduces a new function __napi_poll() which does the main logic of the existing napi_poll() function, and will be called by other functions in later commits. This idea and implementation is done by Felix Fietkau and is proposed as part of the patch to move napi work to work_queue context. This commit by itself is a code restructure. Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau Signed-off-by: Wei Wang --- net/core/dev.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 0332f2e8f7da..7d23bff03864 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -6768,15 +6768,10 @@ void __netif_napi_del(struct napi_struct *napi) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netif_napi_del); -static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) +static int __napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, bool *repoll) { - void *have; int work, weight; - list_del_init(&n->poll_list); - - have = netpoll_poll_lock(n); - weight = n->weight; /* This NAPI_STATE_SCHED test is for avoiding a race @@ -6796,7 +6791,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) n->poll, work, weight); if (likely(work < weight)) - goto out_unlock; + return work; /* Drivers must not modify the NAPI state if they * consume the entire weight. In such cases this code @@ -6805,7 +6800,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) */ if (unlikely(napi_disable_pending(n))) { napi_complete(n); - goto out_unlock; + return work; } /* The NAPI context has more processing work, but busy-polling @@ -6818,7 +6813,7 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) */ napi_schedule(n); } - goto out_unlock; + return work; } if (n->gro_bitmask) { @@ -6836,9 +6831,29 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) if (unlikely(!list_empty(&n->poll_list))) { pr_warn_once("%s: Budget exhausted after napi rescheduled\n", n->dev ? n->dev->name : "backlog"); - goto out_unlock; + return work; } + *repoll = true; + + return work; +} + +static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll) +{ + bool do_repoll = false; + void *have; + int work; + + list_del_init(&n->poll_list); + + have = netpoll_poll_lock(n); + + work = __napi_poll(n, &do_repoll); + + if (!do_repoll) + goto out_unlock; + list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, repoll); out_unlock: