Message ID | 20210204215926.64377-5-george.mccollister@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | add HSR offloading support for DSA switches | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/cc_maintainers | warning | 1 maintainers not CCed: davem@davemloft.net |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 153 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:59:26PM -0600, George McCollister wrote: > +static int xrs700x_hsr_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, > + struct net_device *hsr) > +{ > + unsigned int val = XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR_PRP; > + struct dsa_port *partner = NULL, *dp; > + struct xrs700x *priv = ds->priv; > + struct net_device *slave; > + enum hsr_version ver; > + int ret; > + > + ret = hsr_get_version(hsr, &ver); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (ver == HSR_V1) > + val |= XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR; > + else if (ver == PRP_V1) > + val |= XRS_HSR_CFG_PRP; > + else > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + > + dsa_hsr_foreach_port(dp, ds, hsr) { > + partner = dp; > + } > + > + /* We can't enable redundancy on the switch until both > + * redundant ports have signed up. > + */ > + if (!partner) > + return 0; > + > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, > + XRS_PORT_DISABLED); > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_DISABLED); > + > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(partner->index), > + val | XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_A); > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(port), > + val | XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_B); > + > + /* Clear bits for both redundant ports (HSR only) and the CPU port to > + * enable forwarding. > + */ > + val = GENMASK(ds->num_ports - 1, 0); > + if (ver == HSR_V1) { > + val &= ~BIT(partner->index); > + val &= ~BIT(port); > + } > + val &= ~BIT(dsa_upstream_port(ds, port)); > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(partner->index), val); > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(port), val); > + > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, > + XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); > + > + slave = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->slave; > + > + slave->features |= NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_INS | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_RM | > + NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP; > + > + return 0; > +} Is it deliberate that only one slave HSR/PRP port will have the offload ethtool features set? If yes, then I find that a bit odd from a user point of view.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 5:53 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:59:26PM -0600, George McCollister wrote: > > +static int xrs700x_hsr_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, > > + struct net_device *hsr) > > +{ > > + unsigned int val = XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR_PRP; > > + struct dsa_port *partner = NULL, *dp; > > + struct xrs700x *priv = ds->priv; > > + struct net_device *slave; > > + enum hsr_version ver; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = hsr_get_version(hsr, &ver); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (ver == HSR_V1) > > + val |= XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR; > > + else if (ver == PRP_V1) > > + val |= XRS_HSR_CFG_PRP; > > + else > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + > > + dsa_hsr_foreach_port(dp, ds, hsr) { > > + partner = dp; > > + } > > + > > + /* We can't enable redundancy on the switch until both > > + * redundant ports have signed up. > > + */ > > + if (!partner) > > + return 0; > > + > > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, > > + XRS_PORT_DISABLED); > > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_DISABLED); > > + > > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(partner->index), > > + val | XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_A); > > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(port), > > + val | XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_B); > > + > > + /* Clear bits for both redundant ports (HSR only) and the CPU port to > > + * enable forwarding. > > + */ > > + val = GENMASK(ds->num_ports - 1, 0); > > + if (ver == HSR_V1) { > > + val &= ~BIT(partner->index); > > + val &= ~BIT(port); > > + } > > + val &= ~BIT(dsa_upstream_port(ds, port)); > > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(partner->index), val); > > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(port), val); > > + > > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, > > + XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); > > + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); > > + > > + slave = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->slave; > > + > > + slave->features |= NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_INS | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_RM | > > + NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > Is it deliberate that only one slave HSR/PRP port will have the offload > ethtool features set? If yes, then I find that a bit odd from a user > point of view. No. Good catch. This is a mistake I introduced when I added the code for finding the partner. Originally for testing I had hacks that hard coded the ports used and reconfigured HSR for each join.
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x.c b/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x.c index 259f5e657c46..566ce9330903 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x.c @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ #include <net/dsa.h> #include <linux/if_bridge.h> #include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/netdev_features.h> +#include <linux/if_hsr.h> #include "xrs700x.h" #include "xrs700x_reg.h" @@ -496,6 +498,108 @@ static void xrs700x_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, xrs700x_bridge_common(ds, port, bridge, false); } +static int xrs700x_hsr_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, + struct net_device *hsr) +{ + unsigned int val = XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR_PRP; + struct dsa_port *partner = NULL, *dp; + struct xrs700x *priv = ds->priv; + struct net_device *slave; + enum hsr_version ver; + int ret; + + ret = hsr_get_version(hsr, &ver); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (ver == HSR_V1) + val |= XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR; + else if (ver == PRP_V1) + val |= XRS_HSR_CFG_PRP; + else + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + dsa_hsr_foreach_port(dp, ds, hsr) { + partner = dp; + } + + /* We can't enable redundancy on the switch until both + * redundant ports have signed up. + */ + if (!partner) + return 0; + + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, + XRS_PORT_DISABLED); + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_DISABLED); + + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(partner->index), + val | XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_A); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(port), + val | XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_B); + + /* Clear bits for both redundant ports (HSR only) and the CPU port to + * enable forwarding. + */ + val = GENMASK(ds->num_ports - 1, 0); + if (ver == HSR_V1) { + val &= ~BIT(partner->index); + val &= ~BIT(port); + } + val &= ~BIT(dsa_upstream_port(ds, port)); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(partner->index), val); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(port), val); + + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, + XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); + + slave = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->slave; + + slave->features |= NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_INS | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_RM | + NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP; + + return 0; +} + +static void xrs700x_hsr_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, + struct net_device *hsr) +{ + struct dsa_port *partner = NULL, *dp; + struct xrs700x *priv = ds->priv; + struct net_device *slave; + unsigned int val; + + dsa_hsr_foreach_port(dp, ds, hsr) { + partner = dp; + } + + if (!partner) + return; + + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, + XRS_PORT_DISABLED); + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_DISABLED); + + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(partner->index), 0); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_HSR_CFG(port), 0); + + /* Clear bit for the CPU port to enable forwarding. */ + val = GENMASK(ds->num_ports - 1, 0); + val &= ~BIT(dsa_upstream_port(ds, port)); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(partner->index), val); + regmap_write(priv->regmap, XRS_PORT_FWD_MASK(port), val); + + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, partner->index, + XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); + regmap_fields_write(priv->ps_forward, port, XRS_PORT_FORWARDING); + + slave = dsa_to_port(ds, port)->slave; + + slave->features &= ~(NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_INS | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_TAG_RM | + NETIF_F_HW_HSR_FWD | NETIF_F_HW_HSR_DUP); +} + static const struct dsa_switch_ops xrs700x_ops = { .get_tag_protocol = xrs700x_get_tag_protocol, .setup = xrs700x_setup, @@ -509,6 +613,8 @@ static const struct dsa_switch_ops xrs700x_ops = { .get_stats64 = xrs700x_get_stats64, .port_bridge_join = xrs700x_bridge_join, .port_bridge_leave = xrs700x_bridge_leave, + .port_hsr_join = xrs700x_hsr_join, + .port_hsr_leave = xrs700x_hsr_leave, }; static int xrs700x_detect(struct xrs700x *priv) diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x_reg.h b/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x_reg.h index a135d4d92b6d..470d00e07f15 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x_reg.h +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x_reg.h @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ /* Port Configuration Registers - HSR/PRP */ #define XRS_HSR_CFG(x) (XRS_PORT_HSR_BASE(x) + 0x0) +#define XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR_PRP BIT(0) +#define XRS_HSR_CFG_HSR 0 +#define XRS_HSR_CFG_PRP BIT(8) +#define XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_A 0 +#define XRS_HSR_CFG_LANID_B BIT(10) /* Port Configuration Registers - PTP */ #define XRS_PTP_RX_SYNC_DELAY_NS_LO(x) (XRS_PORT_PTP_BASE(x) + 0x2) diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_xrs700x.c b/net/dsa/tag_xrs700x.c index db0ed1a5fcb7..858cdf9d2913 100644 --- a/net/dsa/tag_xrs700x.c +++ b/net/dsa/tag_xrs700x.c @@ -11,12 +11,17 @@ static struct sk_buff *xrs700x_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { - struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev); + struct dsa_port *partner, *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev); u8 *trailer; trailer = skb_put(skb, 1); trailer[0] = BIT(dp->index); + if (dp->hsr_dev) + dsa_hsr_foreach_port(partner, dp->ds, dp->hsr_dev) + if (partner != dp) + trailer[0] |= BIT(partner->index); + return skb; }
Add offloading for HSR/PRP (IEC 62439-3) tag insertion, tag removal forwarding and duplication supported by the xrs7000 series switches. Only HSR v1 and PRP v1 are supported by the xrs7000 series switches (HSR v0 is not). Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/dsa/xrs700x/xrs700x_reg.h | 5 ++ net/dsa/tag_xrs700x.c | 7 ++- 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)