diff mbox series

[net-next,2/6] mlxsw: spectrum_matchall: Convert if statements to a switch statement

Message ID 20210329100948.355486-3-idosch@idosch.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 50401f292434d5fb99f3f0c9b861f8a84c151ecc
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series mlxsw: Two sampling fixes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 5 of 5 maintainers
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 27 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Ido Schimmel March 29, 2021, 10:09 a.m. UTC 
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

Previous patch moved the protocol check out of the action check, so
these if statements can now be converted to a switch statement. Perform
the conversion.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c
index 9252e23fd082..af0a20581a37 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_matchall.c
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@  int mlxsw_sp_mall_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 
 	act = &f->rule->action.entries[0];
 
-	if (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED) {
+	switch (act->id) {
+	case FLOW_ACTION_MIRRED:
 		if (flower_prio_valid && mall_entry->ingress &&
 		    mall_entry->priority >= flower_min_prio) {
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to add behind existing flower rules");
@@ -267,7 +268,8 @@  int mlxsw_sp_mall_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 		}
 		mall_entry->type = MLXSW_SP_MALL_ACTION_TYPE_MIRROR;
 		mall_entry->mirror.to_dev = act->dev;
-	} else if (act->id == FLOW_ACTION_SAMPLE) {
+		break;
+	case FLOW_ACTION_SAMPLE:
 		if (flower_prio_valid &&
 		    mall_entry->priority >= flower_min_prio) {
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(f->common.extack, "Failed to add behind existing flower rules");
@@ -279,7 +281,8 @@  int mlxsw_sp_mall_replace(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 		mall_entry->sample.params.truncate = act->sample.truncate;
 		mall_entry->sample.params.trunc_size = act->sample.trunc_size;
 		mall_entry->sample.params.rate = act->sample.rate;
-	} else {
+		break;
+	default:
 		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		goto errout;
 	}