diff mbox series

[bpf-next,4/5] selftests/bpf: fix field existence CO-RE reloc tests

Message ID 20210423233058.3386115-5-andrii@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series CO-RE relocation selftests fixes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: ast@kernel.org; 10 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org gustavoars@kernel.org yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org kafai@fb.com iii@linux.ibm.com ast@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com songliubraving@fb.com shuah@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Andrii Nakryiko April 23, 2021, 11:30 p.m. UTC
Negative field existence cases for have a broken assumption that FIELD_EXISTS
CO-RE relo will fail for fields that match the name but have incompatible type
signature. That's not how CO-RE relocations generally behave. Types and fields
that match by name but not by expected type are treated as non-matching
candidates and are skipped. Error later is reported if no matching candidate
was found. That's what happens for most relocations, but existence relocations
(FIELD_EXISTS and TYPE_EXISTS) are more permissive and they are designed to
return 0 or 1, depending if a match is found. This allows to handle
name-conflicting but incompatible types in BPF code easily. Combined with
___flavor suffixes, it's possible to handle pretty much any structural type
changes in kernel within the compiled once BPF source code.

So, long story short, negative field existence test cases are invalid in their
assumptions, so this patch reworks them into a single consolidated positive
case that doesn't match any of the fields.

Fixes: c7566a69695c ("selftests/bpf: Add field existence CO-RE relocs tests")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c     | 31 ++++++++++++-------
 ...ore_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c |  3 --
 ...loc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c |  3 --
 ...ore_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c |  3 --
 ..._core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c |  3 --
 ...ore_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c |  3 --
 ..._reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c |  3 --
 ..._core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c |  3 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h    | 20 ++----------
 9 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c

Comments

Lorenz Bauer April 26, 2021, 8:12 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:36, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Negative field existence cases for have a broken assumption that FIELD_EXISTS
> CO-RE relo will fail for fields that match the name but have incompatible type
> signature. That's not how CO-RE relocations generally behave. Types and fields
> that match by name but not by expected type are treated as non-matching
> candidates and are skipped. Error later is reported if no matching candidate
> was found. That's what happens for most relocations, but existence relocations
> (FIELD_EXISTS and TYPE_EXISTS) are more permissive and they are designed to
> return 0 or 1, depending if a match is found. This allows to handle
> name-conflicting but incompatible types in BPF code easily. Combined with
> ___flavor suffixes, it's possible to handle pretty much any structural type
> changes in kernel within the compiled once BPF source code.
>
> So, long story short, negative field existence test cases are invalid in their
> assumptions, so this patch reworks them into a single consolidated positive
> case that doesn't match any of the fields.
>
> Fixes: c7566a69695c ("selftests/bpf: Add field existence CO-RE relocs tests")
> Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
index d94dcead72e6..385fd7696a2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
@@ -210,11 +210,6 @@  static int duration = 0;
 	.bpf_obj_file = "test_core_reloc_existence.o",			\
 	.btf_src_file = "btf__core_reloc_" #name ".o"			\
 
-#define FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(name) {					\
-	FIELD_EXISTS_CASE_COMMON(name),					\
-	.fails = true,							\
-}
-
 #define BITFIELDS_CASE_COMMON(objfile, test_name_prefix,  name)		\
 	.case_name = test_name_prefix#name,				\
 	.bpf_obj_file = objfile,					\
@@ -643,13 +638,25 @@  static struct core_reloc_test_case test_cases[] = {
 		},
 		.output_len = sizeof(struct core_reloc_existence_output),
 	},
-
-	FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(existence__err_int_sz),
-	FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(existence__err_int_type),
-	FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(existence__err_int_kind),
-	FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(existence__err_arr_kind),
-	FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(existence__err_arr_value_type),
-	FIELD_EXISTS_ERR_CASE(existence__err_struct_type),
+	{
+		FIELD_EXISTS_CASE_COMMON(existence___wrong_field_defs),
+		.input = STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs) {
+		},
+		.input_len = sizeof(struct core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs),
+		.output = STRUCT_TO_CHAR_PTR(core_reloc_existence_output) {
+			.a_exists = 0,
+			.b_exists = 0,
+			.c_exists = 0,
+			.arr_exists = 0,
+			.s_exists = 0,
+			.a_value = 0xff000001u,
+			.b_value = 0xff000002u,
+			.c_value = 0xff000003u,
+			.arr_value = 0xff000004u,
+			.s_value = 0xff000005u,
+		},
+		.output_len = sizeof(struct core_reloc_existence_output),
+	},
 
 	/* bitfield relocation checks */
 	BITFIELDS_CASE(bitfields, {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c
deleted file mode 100644
index dd0ffa518f36..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ 
-#include "core_reloc_types.h"
-
-void f(struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c
deleted file mode 100644
index bc83372088ad..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ 
-#include "core_reloc_types.h"
-
-void f(struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 917bec41be08..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ 
-#include "core_reloc_types.h"
-
-void f(struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 6ec7e6ec1c91..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ 
-#include "core_reloc_types.h"
-
-void f(struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 7bbcacf2b0d1..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ 
-#include "core_reloc_types.h"
-
-void f(struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c
deleted file mode 100644
index f384dd38ec70..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ 
-#include "core_reloc_types.h"
-
-void f(struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d14b496190c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ 
+#include "core_reloc_types.h"
+
+void f(struct core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs x) {}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h
index 9982eb969048..c95c0cabe951 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h
@@ -700,27 +700,11 @@  struct core_reloc_existence___minimal {
 	int a;
 };
 
-struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz {
-	short a;
-};
-
-struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type {
+struct core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs {
+	void *a;
 	int b[1];
-};
-
-struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind {
 	struct{ int x; } c;
-};
-
-struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind {
 	int arr;
-};
-
-struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type {
-	short arr[1];
-};
-
-struct core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type {
 	int s;
 };