Message ID | 20210428162553.719588-3-memxor@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | Add TC-BPF API | expand |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:26 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> wrote: > > This adds functions that wrap the netlink API used for adding, > manipulating, and removing traffic control filters. > > An API summary: > > A bpf_tc_hook represents a location where a TC-BPF filter can be > attached. This means that creating a hook leads to creation of the > backing qdisc, while destruction either removes all filters attached to > a hook, or destroys qdisc if requested explicitly (as discussed below). > > The TC-BPF API functions operate on this bpf_tc_hook to attach, replace, > query, and detach tc filters. > > All functions return 0 on success, and a negative error code on failure. > > bpf_tc_hook_create - Create a hook > Parameters: > @hook - Cannot be NULL, ifindex > 0, attach_point must be set to > proper enum constant. Note that parent must be unset when > attach_point is one of BPF_TC_INGRESS or BPF_TC_EGRESS. Note > that as an exception BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS is also a > valid value for attach_point. > > Returns -EOPNOTSUPP when hook has attach_point as BPF_TC_CUSTOM. > > @flags - Currently only BPF_TC_F_REPLACE, which creates qdisc in > non-exclusive mode (i.e. an existing qdisc will be replaced > instead of this function failing with -EEXIST). > > bpf_tc_hook_destroy - Destroy the hook > Parameters: > @hook - Cannot be NULL. The behaviour depends on value of > attach_point. > > If BPF_TC_INGRESS, all filters attached to the ingress > hook will be detached. > If BPF_TC_EGRESS, all filters attached to the egress hook > will be detached. > If BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS, the clsact qdisc will be > deleted, also detaching all filters. > > It is advised that if the qdisc is operated on by many programs, > then the program atleast check that there are no other existing typo: at least > filters before deleting the clsact qdisc. An example is shown > below: > > /* set opts as NULL, as we're not really interested in > * getting any info for a particular filter, but just > * detecting its presence. > */ this comment probably is better moved to right before bpf_tc_query, otherwise it reads as if it's related to bpf_tc_hook > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, .ifindex = if_nametoindex("lo"), > .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS); > r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, NULL); > if (r < 0 && r == -ENOENT) { well, r == -ENOENT should be enough then, no? > /* no filters */ > hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGREESS; > return bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook); > } else /* failed or r == 0, the latter means filters do exist */ > return r; > > Note that there is a small race between checking for no > filters and deleting the qdisc. This is currently unavoidable. > > Returns -EOPNOTSUPP when hook has attach_point as BPF_TC_CUSTOM. > > bpf_tc_attach - Attach a filter to a hook > Parameters: > @hook - Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook the filter will be > attached to. Requirements for ifindex and attach_point are > same as described in bpf_tc_hook_create, but BPF_TC_CUSTOM > is also supported. In that case, parent must be set to the > handle where the filter will be attached (using TC_H_MAKE). > > E.g. To set parent to 1:16 like in tc command line, > the equivalent would be TC_H_MAKE(1 << 16, 16) > > @opts - Cannot be NULL. > > The following opts are optional: > handle - The handle of the filter > priority - The priority of the filter > Must be >= 0 and <= UINT16_MAX > The following opts must be set: > prog_fd - The fd of the loaded SCHED_CLS prog > The following opts must be unset: > prog_id - The ID of the BPF prog > > The following opts will be filled by bpf_tc_attach on a > successful attach operation if they are unset: > handle - The handle of the attached filter > priority - The priority of the attached filter > prog_id - The ID of the attached SCHED_CLS prog > > This way, the user can know what the auto allocated > values for optional opts like handle and priority are > for the newly attached filter, if they were unset. > > Note that some other attributes are set to some default > values listed below (this holds for all bpf_tc_* APIs): > protocol - ETH_P_ALL > mode - direct action > chain index - 0 > class ID - 0 (this can be set by writing to the > skb->tc_classid field from the BPF program) > > @flags - Currently only BPF_TC_F_REPLACE, which creates filter > in non-exclusive mode (i.e. an existing filter with the > same attributes will be replaced instead of this > function failing with -EEXIST). > > bpf_tc_detach > Parameters: > @hook: Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook the filter will be > detached from. Requirements are same as described above > in bpf_tc_attach. > > @opts: Cannot be NULL. > > The following opts must be set: > handle > priority > The following opts must be unset: > prog_fd > prog_id > > bpf_tc_query > Parameters: > @hook: Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook where the filter > lookup will be performed. Requires are same as described > above in bpf_tc_attach. > > @opts: Can be NULL. > > The following opts are optional: > handle > priority > prog_fd > prog_id > > However, only one of prog_fd and prog_id must be > set. Setting both leads to an error. Setting none is > allowed. > > The following fields will be filled by bpf_tc_query on a > successful lookup if they are unset: > handle > priority > prog_id > > Based on the specified optional parameters, the matching > data for the first matching filter is filled in and 0 is > returned. When setting prog_fd, the prog_id will be > matched against prog_id of the loaded SCHED_CLS prog > represented by prog_fd. > > To uniquely identify a filter, e.g. to detect its presence, > it is recommended to set both handle and priority fields. > > Some usage examples (using bpf skeleton infrastructure): > > BPF program (test_tc_bpf.c): > > #include <linux/bpf.h> > #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> > > SEC("classifier") > int cls(struct __sk_buff *skb) > { > return 0; > } > > Userspace loader: > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, 0); > struct test_tc_bpf *skel = NULL; > int fd, r; > > skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load(); > if (!skel) > return -ENOMEM; > > fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cls); > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, hook, .ifindex = > if_nametoindex("lo"), .attach_point = > BPF_TC_INGRESS); > /* Create clsact qdisc */ > r = bpf_tc_hook_create(&hook, 0); > if (r < 0) > goto end; > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, .prog_fd = fd); I don't feel too strongly about this w.r.t. example, but DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS() does declare a variable, so according to C89 all such declarations should be gathered at the top. It would be nice to stick to this in the example, but I can see how such locality is a bit better for educational purposes, so I'm ok with that as well. > r = bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &opts, 0); > if (r < 0) > goto end; > /* Print the auto allocated handle and priority */ > printf("Handle=%"PRIu32", opts.handle); let's drop PRIu32, libbpf doesn't use it so let's not use it as an example, %u would work fine here > printf("Priority=%"PRIu32", opts.priority); > > opts.prog_fd = opts.prog_id = 0; > bpf_tc_detach(&hook, &opts); > end: > test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel); > > This is equivalent to doing the following using tc command line: > # tc qdisc add dev lo clsact > # tc filter add dev lo ingress bpf obj foo.o sec classifier da > > Another example replacing a filter (extending prior example): > > /* We can also choose both (or one), let's try replacing an > * existing filter. > */ > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, replace_opts, .handle = > opts.handle, .priority = opts.priority, > .prog_fd = fd); > r = bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &replace_opts, 0); > if (r < 0 && r == -EEXIST) { again, == -EEXISTS implies r < 0, this just looks sloppy > /* Expected, now use BPF_TC_F_REPLACE to replace it */ > return bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &replace_opts, BPF_TC_F_REPLACE); > } else if (r == 0) { I'd go with else if (r < 0) { return r; } /* handle happy case without unnecessary nesting */ > /* There must be no existing filter with these > * attributes, so cleanup and return an error. > */ > replace_opts.prog_fd = replace_opts.prog_id = 0; > r = bpf_tc_detach(&hook, &replace_opts); > if (r == 0) > r = -1; just return -1; > } > return r; > > To obtain info of a particular filter: > > /* Find info for filter with handle 1 and priority 50 */ > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, info_opts, .handle = 1, > .priority = 50); > r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, &info_opts); > if (r < 0 && r == -ENOENT) > printf("Filter not found"); > else if (r == 0) > printf("Prog ID: %"PRIu32", info_opts.prog_id); same about PRI and r < 0 > return r; > > We can also match using prog_id to find the same filter: > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, info_opts2, .prog_id = > info_opts.prog_id); > r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, &info_opts2); > if (r < 0 && r == -ENOENT) > printf("Filter not found"); > else if (r == 0) { > /* If we know there's only one filter for this loaded prog, > * it is safe to assert that the handle and priority are > * as expected. > */ > assert(info_opts2.handle == 1); > assert(info_opts2.priority == 50); > } > return r; > > Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > --- API looks good to me (except the flags field that just stands out). But I'll defer to Daniel to make the final call. > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 41 ++++ > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 5 + > tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 463 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > index bec4e6a6e31d..3de701f46a33 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > @@ -775,6 +775,47 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__add_file(struct bpf_linker *linker, const char *filen > LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__finalize(struct bpf_linker *linker); > LIBBPF_API void bpf_linker__free(struct bpf_linker *linker); > > +enum bpf_tc_attach_point { > + BPF_TC_INGRESS = 1 << 0, > + BPF_TC_EGRESS = 1 << 1, > + BPF_TC_CUSTOM = 1 << 2, > +}; > + > +enum bpf_tc_attach_flags { > + BPF_TC_F_REPLACE = 1 << 0, > +}; > + > +struct bpf_tc_hook { > + size_t sz; > + int ifindex; > + enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point; > + __u32 parent; > + size_t :0; > +}; > + > +#define bpf_tc_hook__last_field parent > + > +struct bpf_tc_opts { > + size_t sz; > + int prog_fd; > + __u32 prog_id; > + __u32 handle; > + __u32 priority; > + size_t :0; > +}; > + > +#define bpf_tc_opts__last_field priority > + > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags); > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook); > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, > + int flags); why didn't you put flags into bpf_tc_opts? they are clearly optional and fit into "opts" paradigm... > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); > + > #ifdef __cplusplus > } /* extern "C" */ > #endif > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > index b9b29baf1df8..04509c7c144b 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > @@ -361,4 +361,9 @@ LIBBPF_0.4.0 { > bpf_linker__new; > bpf_map__inner_map; > bpf_object__set_kversion; > + bpf_tc_hook_create; > + bpf_tc_hook_destroy; please keep this alphabetically sorted > + bpf_tc_attach; > + bpf_tc_detach; > + bpf_tc_query; > } LIBBPF_0.3.0; > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c > index 6daee6640725..88f7b6144c78 100644 > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c > @@ -4,7 +4,11 @@ > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <memory.h> > #include <unistd.h> > +#include <inttypes.h> > +#include <arpa/inet.h> > #include <linux/bpf.h> > +#include <linux/if_ether.h> > +#include <linux/pkt_cls.h> > #include <linux/rtnetlink.h> > #include <sys/socket.h> > #include <errno.h> > @@ -73,6 +77,12 @@ static int libbpf_netlink_open(__u32 *nl_pid) > return ret; > } > > +enum { > + BPF_NL_CONT, > + BPF_NL_NEXT, > + BPF_NL_DONE, > +}; > + > static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, > __dump_nlmsg_t _fn, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, > void *cookie) > @@ -84,6 +94,7 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, > int len, ret; > > while (multipart) { > +start: > multipart = false; > len = recv(sock, buf, sizeof(buf), 0); > if (len < 0) { > @@ -121,8 +132,18 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, > } > if (_fn) { > ret = _fn(nh, fn, cookie); > - if (ret) > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + switch (ret) { > + case BPF_NL_CONT: > + break; > + case BPF_NL_NEXT: > + goto start; > + case BPF_NL_DONE: > + return 0; > + default: > return ret; > + } > } > } > } > @@ -357,3 +378,443 @@ static int libbpf_nl_send_recv(struct nlmsghdr *nh, __dump_nlmsg_t fn, > close(sock); > return ret; > } > + > +/* TC-HOOK */ > + > +typedef int (*qdisc_config_t)(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, > + size_t maxsz); > + > +static int clsact_config(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, size_t maxsz) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + t->tcm_parent = TC_H_CLSACT; > + t->tcm_handle = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, 0); > + > + ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_KIND, "clsact", sizeof("clsact")); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + return 0; nit: return nlattr_add(...) > +} > + > +static int attach_point_to_config(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, qdisc_config_t *configp) > +{ > + if (!hook) > + return -EINVAL; !hook should be already ensured by calling functions, no need to re-check this everywhere, do this only in API methods. All internal functions should already ensure non-NULL, otherwise it's a bug. > + > + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { is int casting necessary here? > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)) > + return -EINVAL; > + *configp = &clsact_config; > + break; > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static long long int tc_get_tcm_parent(enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point, > + __u32 parent) > +{ > + long long int ret; > + > + switch (attach_point) { > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > + if (parent) > + return -EINVAL; > + ret = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_INGRESS); direct return > + break; > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > + if (parent) > + return -EINVAL; > + ret = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_EGRESS); same, make it explicit that we are done and it's the final value returned > + break; > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > + if (!parent) > + return -EINVAL; > + ret = parent; > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int tc_qdisc_modify(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int cmd, int flags) > +{ > + qdisc_config_t config; > + int ret = 0; unnecessary initialization, some tooling definitely will complain, please drop = 0 part > + struct { > + struct nlmsghdr nh; > + struct tcmsg t; > + char buf[256]; > + } req; > + > + ret = attach_point_to_config(hook, &config); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); > + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); > + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = > + NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | flags; we can go up to 100 character lines, keep it on single line > + req.nh.nlmsg_type = cmd; > + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; > + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); > + > + ret = config(&req.nh, &req.t, sizeof(req)); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int tc_qdisc_create_excl(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags) > +{ > + flags = flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL; see below as well, please use () around bit operators > + return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_NEWQDISC, NLM_F_CREATE | flags); > +} > + > +static int tc_qdisc_delete(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) > +{ > + return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_DELQDISC, 0); > +} > + > +int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags) > +{ > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook)) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) please use () around bit operators > + return -EINVAL; > + > + return tc_qdisc_create_excl(hook, flags); > +} > + > +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush); > + > +int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) > +{ > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || > + OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { int casting. Did the compiler complain about that or what? > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > + return tc_cls_detach(hook, NULL, true); > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: > + return tc_qdisc_delete(hook); > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > +} > + > +struct pass_info { > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts; > + __u32 match_prog_id; > + bool processed; > +}; > + > +/* TC-BPF */ > + > +static int tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t maxsz, int fd) > +{ > + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; > + char name[256] = {}; you are unconditionally snprintf()'ing into name, don't unnecessarily initialize it > + int len, ret; > + > + ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &(__u32){sizeof(info)}); that sizeof part... even if that works reliably, stick to normal use pattern, have a local variable for that. It can be overwritten by the kernel. you can re-use len for this, btw > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_FD, &fd, sizeof(fd)); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + len = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:[%" PRIu32 "]", info.name, libbpf doesn't use PRI modifiers, use %u > + info.id); > + if (len < 0 || len >= sizeof(name)) > + return len < 0 ? -EINVAL : -ENAMETOOLONG; if (len < 0) return -errno; if (len >= sizeof(name)) return -ENAMETOOLONG; > + > + return nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_NAME, name, len + 1); > +} > + > + > +static int cls_get_info(struct nlmsghdr *nh, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, > + void *cookie); > + > +int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, int flags) > +{ > + __u32 protocol = 0, bpf_flags; > + struct pass_info info = {}; > + long long int tcm_parent; > + struct nlattr *nla; > + int ret; > + struct { > + struct nlmsghdr nh; > + struct tcmsg t; > + char buf[256]; > + } req; > + > + if (!hook || !opts || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_opts) || > + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || !OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) || > + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0)) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; > + flags = flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL; () > + > + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); > + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); > + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = > + NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_ECHO | flags; > + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_NEWTFILTER; > + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; > + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); > + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); you are OPTS_GET()ing same stuff multiple times, it might look cleaner to use local variables for that. It will be faster also, but that's not important here. > + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, htons(protocol)); > + > + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); and this will be much shorter, positively, please use local variables for all those input fields you care about > + if (tcm_parent < 0) > + return tcm_parent; > + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; > + > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + nla = nlattr_begin_nested(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_OPTIONS); > + if (!nla) > + return -EMSGSIZE; > + > + ret = tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(&req.nh, sizeof(req), OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0)); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + /* direct action mode is always enabled */ > + bpf_flags = TCA_BPF_FLAG_ACT_DIRECT; > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_BPF_FLAGS, > + &bpf_flags, sizeof(bpf_flags)); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + nlattr_end_nested(&req.nh, nla); > + > + info.opts = opts; > + > + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, &cls_get_info, NULL, &info); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + /* Failed to process unicast response */ > + if (!info.processed) > + ret = -ENOENT; just return directly, you just did that multiple times above, why this one is special? > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush) > +{ > + long long int tcm_parent; > + __u32 protocol = 0; > + int ret, c; > + struct { > + struct nlmsghdr nh; > + struct tcmsg t; > + char buf[256]; > + } req; > + > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_opts) || > + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) || > + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0)) > + return -EINVAL; > + c = !!OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0) + !!OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0); > + if ((flush && c != 0) || (!flush && c != 2)) > + return -EINVAL; arithmetics here looks pretty ugly, would it be too bad with logical checks? > + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (!flush) > + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; > + > + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); > + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); > + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK; > + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_DELTFILTER; > + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; > + if (!flush) > + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); > + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); > + if (!flush) > + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, OPTS_GET()s just make everything uglier and unnecessarily verbose > + htons(protocol)); > + > + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); > + if (tcm_parent < 0) > + return tcm_parent; > + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; > + > + if (!flush) { > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + > + return libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL); > +} > + [...] > + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); > + if (tcm_parent < 0) > + return tcm_parent; > + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; > + > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0)) { > + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; > + ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0), &info, &(__u32){sizeof(info)}); same as before, use dedicated variable > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + pinfo.match_prog_id = info.id; > + } else > + pinfo.match_prog_id = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0); when one branch of if has {}, the other one has to have it as well, please fix > + > + pinfo.opts = opts; > + > + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, cls_get_info, NULL, &pinfo); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (!pinfo.processed) > + ret = -ENOENT; direct return > + > + return ret; > +} > -- > 2.30.2 >
On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 01:05:40AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:26 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This adds functions that wrap the netlink API used for adding, > > manipulating, and removing traffic control filters. > > > > An API summary: > > > > A bpf_tc_hook represents a location where a TC-BPF filter can be > > attached. This means that creating a hook leads to creation of the > > backing qdisc, while destruction either removes all filters attached to > > a hook, or destroys qdisc if requested explicitly (as discussed below). > > > > The TC-BPF API functions operate on this bpf_tc_hook to attach, replace, > > query, and detach tc filters. > > > > All functions return 0 on success, and a negative error code on failure. > > > > bpf_tc_hook_create - Create a hook > > Parameters: > > @hook - Cannot be NULL, ifindex > 0, attach_point must be set to > > proper enum constant. Note that parent must be unset when > > attach_point is one of BPF_TC_INGRESS or BPF_TC_EGRESS. Note > > that as an exception BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS is also a > > valid value for attach_point. > > > > Returns -EOPNOTSUPP when hook has attach_point as BPF_TC_CUSTOM. > > > > @flags - Currently only BPF_TC_F_REPLACE, which creates qdisc in > > non-exclusive mode (i.e. an existing qdisc will be replaced > > instead of this function failing with -EEXIST). > > > > bpf_tc_hook_destroy - Destroy the hook > > Parameters: > > @hook - Cannot be NULL. The behaviour depends on value of > > attach_point. > > > > If BPF_TC_INGRESS, all filters attached to the ingress > > hook will be detached. > > If BPF_TC_EGRESS, all filters attached to the egress hook > > will be detached. > > If BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS, the clsact qdisc will be > > deleted, also detaching all filters. > > > > It is advised that if the qdisc is operated on by many programs, > > then the program atleast check that there are no other existing > > typo: at least > Will fix. > > filters before deleting the clsact qdisc. An example is shown > > below: > > > > /* set opts as NULL, as we're not really interested in > > * getting any info for a particular filter, but just > > * detecting its presence. > > */ > > this comment probably is better moved to right before bpf_tc_query, > otherwise it reads as if it's related to bpf_tc_hook > Ok. > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, .ifindex = if_nametoindex("lo"), > > .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS); > > r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, NULL); > > if (r < 0 && r == -ENOENT) { > > well, r == -ENOENT should be enough then, no? > Yes, I'll change it. > > /* no filters */ > > hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGREESS; > > return bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook); > > } else /* failed or r == 0, the latter means filters do exist */ > > return r; > > > > Note that there is a small race between checking for no > > filters and deleting the qdisc. This is currently unavoidable. > > > > Returns -EOPNOTSUPP when hook has attach_point as BPF_TC_CUSTOM. > > > > bpf_tc_attach - Attach a filter to a hook > > Parameters: > > @hook - Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook the filter will be > > attached to. Requirements for ifindex and attach_point are > > same as described in bpf_tc_hook_create, but BPF_TC_CUSTOM > > is also supported. In that case, parent must be set to the > > handle where the filter will be attached (using TC_H_MAKE). > > > > E.g. To set parent to 1:16 like in tc command line, > > the equivalent would be TC_H_MAKE(1 << 16, 16) > > > > @opts - Cannot be NULL. > > > > The following opts are optional: > > handle - The handle of the filter > > priority - The priority of the filter > > Must be >= 0 and <= UINT16_MAX > > The following opts must be set: > > prog_fd - The fd of the loaded SCHED_CLS prog > > The following opts must be unset: > > prog_id - The ID of the BPF prog > > > > The following opts will be filled by bpf_tc_attach on a > > successful attach operation if they are unset: > > handle - The handle of the attached filter > > priority - The priority of the attached filter > > prog_id - The ID of the attached SCHED_CLS prog > > > > This way, the user can know what the auto allocated > > values for optional opts like handle and priority are > > for the newly attached filter, if they were unset. > > > > Note that some other attributes are set to some default > > values listed below (this holds for all bpf_tc_* APIs): > > protocol - ETH_P_ALL > > mode - direct action > > chain index - 0 > > class ID - 0 (this can be set by writing to the > > skb->tc_classid field from the BPF program) > > > > @flags - Currently only BPF_TC_F_REPLACE, which creates filter > > in non-exclusive mode (i.e. an existing filter with the > > same attributes will be replaced instead of this > > function failing with -EEXIST). > > > > bpf_tc_detach > > Parameters: > > @hook: Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook the filter will be > > detached from. Requirements are same as described above > > in bpf_tc_attach. > > > > @opts: Cannot be NULL. > > > > The following opts must be set: > > handle > > priority > > The following opts must be unset: > > prog_fd > > prog_id > > > > bpf_tc_query > > Parameters: > > @hook: Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook where the filter > > lookup will be performed. Requires are same as described > > above in bpf_tc_attach. > > > > @opts: Can be NULL. > > > > The following opts are optional: > > handle > > priority > > prog_fd > > prog_id > > > > However, only one of prog_fd and prog_id must be > > set. Setting both leads to an error. Setting none is > > allowed. > > > > The following fields will be filled by bpf_tc_query on a > > successful lookup if they are unset: > > handle > > priority > > prog_id > > > > Based on the specified optional parameters, the matching > > data for the first matching filter is filled in and 0 is > > returned. When setting prog_fd, the prog_id will be > > matched against prog_id of the loaded SCHED_CLS prog > > represented by prog_fd. > > > > To uniquely identify a filter, e.g. to detect its presence, > > it is recommended to set both handle and priority fields. > > > > Some usage examples (using bpf skeleton infrastructure): > > > > BPF program (test_tc_bpf.c): > > > > #include <linux/bpf.h> > > #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> > > > > SEC("classifier") > > int cls(struct __sk_buff *skb) > > { > > return 0; > > } > > > > Userspace loader: > > > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, 0); > > struct test_tc_bpf *skel = NULL; > > int fd, r; > > > > skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load(); > > if (!skel) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cls); > > > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, hook, .ifindex = > > if_nametoindex("lo"), .attach_point = > > BPF_TC_INGRESS); > > /* Create clsact qdisc */ > > r = bpf_tc_hook_create(&hook, 0); > > if (r < 0) > > goto end; > > > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, .prog_fd = fd); > > I don't feel too strongly about this w.r.t. example, but > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS() does declare a variable, so according to C89 all > such declarations should be gathered at the top. It would be nice to > stick to this in the example, but I can see how such locality is a bit > better for educational purposes, so I'm ok with that as well. > > > r = bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &opts, 0); > > if (r < 0) > > goto end; > > /* Print the auto allocated handle and priority */ > > printf("Handle=%"PRIu32", opts.handle); > > let's drop PRIu32, libbpf doesn't use it so let's not use it as an > example, %u would work fine here > Ok, will drop. > > printf("Priority=%"PRIu32", opts.priority); > > > > opts.prog_fd = opts.prog_id = 0; > > bpf_tc_detach(&hook, &opts); > > end: > > test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel); > > > > This is equivalent to doing the following using tc command line: > > # tc qdisc add dev lo clsact > > # tc filter add dev lo ingress bpf obj foo.o sec classifier da > > > > Another example replacing a filter (extending prior example): > > > > /* We can also choose both (or one), let's try replacing an > > * existing filter. > > */ > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, replace_opts, .handle = > > opts.handle, .priority = opts.priority, > > .prog_fd = fd); > > r = bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &replace_opts, 0); > > if (r < 0 && r == -EEXIST) { > > again, == -EEXISTS implies r < 0, this just looks sloppy > > > /* Expected, now use BPF_TC_F_REPLACE to replace it */ > > return bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &replace_opts, BPF_TC_F_REPLACE); > > } else if (r == 0) { > > I'd go with > > else if (r < 0) { > return r; > } > > /* handle happy case without unnecessary nesting */ > Ok. > > /* There must be no existing filter with these > > * attributes, so cleanup and return an error. > > */ > > replace_opts.prog_fd = replace_opts.prog_id = 0; > > r = bpf_tc_detach(&hook, &replace_opts); > > if (r == 0) > > r = -1; > > just return -1; > Ok. > > } > > return r; > > > > To obtain info of a particular filter: > > > > /* Find info for filter with handle 1 and priority 50 */ > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, info_opts, .handle = 1, > > .priority = 50); > > r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, &info_opts); > > if (r < 0 && r == -ENOENT) > > printf("Filter not found"); > > else if (r == 0) > > printf("Prog ID: %"PRIu32", info_opts.prog_id); > > same about PRI and r < 0 > > > return r; > > > > We can also match using prog_id to find the same filter: > > > > DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, info_opts2, .prog_id = > > info_opts.prog_id); > > r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, &info_opts2); > > if (r < 0 && r == -ENOENT) > > printf("Filter not found"); > > else if (r == 0) { > > /* If we know there's only one filter for this loaded prog, > > * it is safe to assert that the handle and priority are > > * as expected. > > */ > > assert(info_opts2.handle == 1); > > assert(info_opts2.priority == 50); > > } > > return r; > > > > Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > > --- > > API looks good to me (except the flags field that just stands out). > But I'll defer to Daniel to make the final call. > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 41 ++++ > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 5 + > > tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 463 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 3 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > > index bec4e6a6e31d..3de701f46a33 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > > @@ -775,6 +775,47 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__add_file(struct bpf_linker *linker, const char *filen > > LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__finalize(struct bpf_linker *linker); > > LIBBPF_API void bpf_linker__free(struct bpf_linker *linker); > > > > +enum bpf_tc_attach_point { > > + BPF_TC_INGRESS = 1 << 0, > > + BPF_TC_EGRESS = 1 << 1, > > + BPF_TC_CUSTOM = 1 << 2, > > +}; > > + > > +enum bpf_tc_attach_flags { > > + BPF_TC_F_REPLACE = 1 << 0, > > +}; > > + > > +struct bpf_tc_hook { > > + size_t sz; > > + int ifindex; > > + enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point; > > + __u32 parent; > > + size_t :0; > > +}; > > + > > +#define bpf_tc_hook__last_field parent > > + > > +struct bpf_tc_opts { > > + size_t sz; > > + int prog_fd; > > + __u32 prog_id; > > + __u32 handle; > > + __u32 priority; > > + size_t :0; > > +}; > > + > > +#define bpf_tc_opts__last_field priority > > + > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags); > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook); > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, > > + int flags); > > why didn't you put flags into bpf_tc_opts? they are clearly optional > and fit into "opts" paradigm... > I can move this into opts, but during previous discussion it was kept outside opts by Daniel, so I kept that unchanged. > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); > > + > > #ifdef __cplusplus > > } /* extern "C" */ > > #endif > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > > index b9b29baf1df8..04509c7c144b 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map > > @@ -361,4 +361,9 @@ LIBBPF_0.4.0 { > > bpf_linker__new; > > bpf_map__inner_map; > > bpf_object__set_kversion; > > + bpf_tc_hook_create; > > + bpf_tc_hook_destroy; > > please keep this alphabetically sorted > Ok. > > + bpf_tc_attach; > > + bpf_tc_detach; > > + bpf_tc_query; > > } LIBBPF_0.3.0; > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c > > index 6daee6640725..88f7b6144c78 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c > > @@ -4,7 +4,11 @@ > > #include <stdlib.h> > > #include <memory.h> > > #include <unistd.h> > > +#include <inttypes.h> > > +#include <arpa/inet.h> > > #include <linux/bpf.h> > > +#include <linux/if_ether.h> > > +#include <linux/pkt_cls.h> > > #include <linux/rtnetlink.h> > > #include <sys/socket.h> > > #include <errno.h> > > @@ -73,6 +77,12 @@ static int libbpf_netlink_open(__u32 *nl_pid) > > return ret; > > } > > > > +enum { > > + BPF_NL_CONT, > > + BPF_NL_NEXT, > > + BPF_NL_DONE, > > +}; > > + > > static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, > > __dump_nlmsg_t _fn, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, > > void *cookie) > > @@ -84,6 +94,7 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, > > int len, ret; > > > > while (multipart) { > > +start: > > multipart = false; > > len = recv(sock, buf, sizeof(buf), 0); > > if (len < 0) { > > @@ -121,8 +132,18 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, > > } > > if (_fn) { > > ret = _fn(nh, fn, cookie); > > - if (ret) > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + switch (ret) { > > + case BPF_NL_CONT: > > + break; > > + case BPF_NL_NEXT: > > + goto start; > > + case BPF_NL_DONE: > > + return 0; > > + default: > > return ret; > > + } > > } > > } > > } > > @@ -357,3 +378,443 @@ static int libbpf_nl_send_recv(struct nlmsghdr *nh, __dump_nlmsg_t fn, > > close(sock); > > return ret; > > } > > + > > +/* TC-HOOK */ > > + > > +typedef int (*qdisc_config_t)(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, > > + size_t maxsz); > > + > > +static int clsact_config(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, size_t maxsz) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + > > + t->tcm_parent = TC_H_CLSACT; > > + t->tcm_handle = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, 0); > > + > > + ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_KIND, "clsact", sizeof("clsact")); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + return 0; > > nit: return nlattr_add(...) > Will fix. > > +} > > + > > +static int attach_point_to_config(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, qdisc_config_t *configp) > > +{ > > + if (!hook) > > + return -EINVAL; > > !hook should be already ensured by calling functions, no need to > re-check this everywhere, do this only in API methods. All internal > functions should already ensure non-NULL, otherwise it's a bug. > Right, will fix. > > + > > + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { > > is int casting necessary here? > > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + *configp = &clsact_config; > > + break; > > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static long long int tc_get_tcm_parent(enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point, > > + __u32 parent) > > +{ > > + long long int ret; > > + > > + switch (attach_point) { > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > > + if (parent) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + ret = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_INGRESS); > > direct return > > > + break; > > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > + if (parent) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + ret = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_EGRESS); > > same, make it explicit that we are done and it's the final value returned > > > + break; > > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > > + if (!parent) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + ret = parent; > > + break; > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int tc_qdisc_modify(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int cmd, int flags) > > +{ > > + qdisc_config_t config; > > + int ret = 0; > > unnecessary initialization, some tooling definitely will complain, > please drop = 0 part > > > + struct { > > + struct nlmsghdr nh; > > + struct tcmsg t; > > + char buf[256]; > > + } req; > > + > > + ret = attach_point_to_config(hook, &config); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); > > + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); > > + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = > > + NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | flags; > > we can go up to 100 character lines, keep it on single line > > > + req.nh.nlmsg_type = cmd; > > + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; > > + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); > > + > > + ret = config(&req.nh, &req.t, sizeof(req)); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int tc_qdisc_create_excl(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags) > > +{ > > + flags = flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL; > > see below as well, please use () around bit operators > Right. > > + return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_NEWQDISC, NLM_F_CREATE | flags); > > +} > > + > > +static int tc_qdisc_delete(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) > > +{ > > + return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_DELQDISC, 0); > > +} > > + > > +int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags) > > +{ > > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) > > please use () around bit operators > Ok. > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + return tc_qdisc_create_excl(hook, flags); > > +} > > + > > +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush); > > + > > +int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) > > +{ > > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || > > + OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { > > int casting. Did the compiler complain about that or what? > It complains on -Wswitch, as we switch on values apart from the enum values, but I'll see if I can remove it. > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > + return tc_cls_detach(hook, NULL, true); > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > + return tc_qdisc_delete(hook); > > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > + default: > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +struct pass_info { > > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts; > > + __u32 match_prog_id; > > + bool processed; > > +}; > > + > > +/* TC-BPF */ > > + > > +static int tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t maxsz, int fd) > > +{ > > + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; > > + char name[256] = {}; > > you are unconditionally snprintf()'ing into name, don't unnecessarily > initialize it > Ok. > > + int len, ret; > > + > > + ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &(__u32){sizeof(info)}); > > that sizeof part... even if that works reliably, stick to normal use > pattern, have a local variable for that. It can be overwritten by the > kernel. > > you can re-use len for this, btw > Ok, will fix everywhere. > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_FD, &fd, sizeof(fd)); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + len = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:[%" PRIu32 "]", info.name, > > libbpf doesn't use PRI modifiers, use %u > Ok. > > + info.id); > > + if (len < 0 || len >= sizeof(name)) > > + return len < 0 ? -EINVAL : -ENAMETOOLONG; > > if (len < 0) > return -errno; > if (len >= sizeof(name)) > return -ENAMETOOLONG; > Ok. > > + > > + return nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_NAME, name, len + 1); > > +} > > + > > + > > +static int cls_get_info(struct nlmsghdr *nh, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, > > + void *cookie); > > + > > +int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, int flags) > > +{ > > + __u32 protocol = 0, bpf_flags; > > + struct pass_info info = {}; > > + long long int tcm_parent; > > + struct nlattr *nla; > > + int ret; > > + struct { > > + struct nlmsghdr nh; > > + struct tcmsg t; > > + char buf[256]; > > + } req; > > + > > + if (!hook || !opts || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_opts) || > > + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || !OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) || > > + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; > > + flags = flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL; > > () > > > + > > + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); > > + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); > > + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = > > + NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_ECHO | flags; > > + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_NEWTFILTER; > > + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; > > + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); > > + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); > > you are OPTS_GET()ing same stuff multiple times, it might look cleaner > to use local variables for that. It will be faster also, but that's > not important here. > > > + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, htons(protocol)); > > + > > + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); > > and this will be much shorter, positively, please use local variables > for all those input fields you care about > Ok, will fix. > > + if (tcm_parent < 0) > > + return tcm_parent; > > + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; > > + > > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + nla = nlattr_begin_nested(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_OPTIONS); > > + if (!nla) > > + return -EMSGSIZE; > > + > > + ret = tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(&req.nh, sizeof(req), OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0)); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + /* direct action mode is always enabled */ > > + bpf_flags = TCA_BPF_FLAG_ACT_DIRECT; > > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_BPF_FLAGS, > > + &bpf_flags, sizeof(bpf_flags)); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + nlattr_end_nested(&req.nh, nla); > > + > > + info.opts = opts; > > + > > + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, &cls_get_info, NULL, &info); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + /* Failed to process unicast response */ > > + if (!info.processed) > > + ret = -ENOENT; > > just return directly, you just did that multiple times above, why this > one is special? > Yes, this can be a direct return. A lot of this is just oversight from the constant rewriting etc. > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush) > > +{ > > + long long int tcm_parent; > > + __u32 protocol = 0; > > + int ret, c; > > + struct { > > + struct nlmsghdr nh; > > + struct tcmsg t; > > + char buf[256]; > > + } req; > > + > > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_opts) || > > + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) || > > + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + c = !!OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0) + !!OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0); > > + if ((flush && c != 0) || (!flush && c != 2)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > arithmetics here looks pretty ugly, would it be too bad with logical checks? > I'll do it with logical checks, this was just shorter. > > + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (!flush) > > + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; > > + > > + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); > > + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); > > + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK; > > + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_DELTFILTER; > > + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; > > + if (!flush) > > + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); > > + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); > > + if (!flush) > > + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, > > OPTS_GET()s just make everything uglier and unnecessarily verbose > > > + htons(protocol)); > > + > > + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); > > + if (tcm_parent < 0) > > + return tcm_parent; > > + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; > > + > > + if (!flush) { > > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + return libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL); > > +} > > + > > [...] > > > + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); > > + if (tcm_parent < 0) > > + return tcm_parent; > > + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; > > + > > + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0)) { > > + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; > > + ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0), &info, &(__u32){sizeof(info)}); > > same as before, use dedicated variable > > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + pinfo.match_prog_id = info.id; > > + } else > > + pinfo.match_prog_id = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0); > > when one branch of if has {}, the other one has to have it as well, please fix > Ok. > > + > > + pinfo.opts = opts; > > + > > + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, cls_get_info, NULL, &pinfo); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + if (!pinfo.processed) > > + ret = -ENOENT; > > direct return > Ok. > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > -- > > 2.30.2 > > -- Kartikeya
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:32 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 01:05:40AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 9:26 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > This adds functions that wrap the netlink API used for adding, > > > manipulating, and removing traffic control filters. > > > > > > An API summary: > > > > > > A bpf_tc_hook represents a location where a TC-BPF filter can be > > > attached. This means that creating a hook leads to creation of the > > > backing qdisc, while destruction either removes all filters attached to > > > a hook, or destroys qdisc if requested explicitly (as discussed below). > > > > > > The TC-BPF API functions operate on this bpf_tc_hook to attach, replace, > > > query, and detach tc filters. > > > > > > All functions return 0 on success, and a negative error code on failure. > > > [...] > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > > API looks good to me (except the flags field that just stands out). > > But I'll defer to Daniel to make the final call. > > > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 41 ++++ > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 5 + > > > tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 463 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 3 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > > > index bec4e6a6e31d..3de701f46a33 100644 > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h > > > @@ -775,6 +775,47 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__add_file(struct bpf_linker *linker, const char *filen > > > LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__finalize(struct bpf_linker *linker); > > > LIBBPF_API void bpf_linker__free(struct bpf_linker *linker); > > > > > > +enum bpf_tc_attach_point { > > > + BPF_TC_INGRESS = 1 << 0, > > > + BPF_TC_EGRESS = 1 << 1, > > > + BPF_TC_CUSTOM = 1 << 2, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +enum bpf_tc_attach_flags { > > > + BPF_TC_F_REPLACE = 1 << 0, > > > +}; > > > + > > > +struct bpf_tc_hook { > > > + size_t sz; > > > + int ifindex; > > > + enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point; > > > + __u32 parent; > > > + size_t :0; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +#define bpf_tc_hook__last_field parent > > > + > > > +struct bpf_tc_opts { > > > + size_t sz; > > > + int prog_fd; > > > + __u32 prog_id; > > > + __u32 handle; > > > + __u32 priority; > > > + size_t :0; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +#define bpf_tc_opts__last_field priority > > > + > > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags); > > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook); > > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, > > > + int flags); > > > > why didn't you put flags into bpf_tc_opts? they are clearly optional > > and fit into "opts" paradigm... > > > > I can move this into opts, but during previous discussion it was kept outside > opts by Daniel, so I kept that unchanged. for bpf_tc_attach() I see no reason to keep flags separate. For bpf_tc_hook_create()... for extensibility it would need it's own opts for hook creation. But if flags is 99% the only thing we'll need, then we can always add extra bpf_tc_hook_create_opts() later. > > > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); > > > +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > > + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); > > > + > > > #ifdef __cplusplus > > > } /* extern "C" */ > > > #endif [...] > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + return tc_qdisc_create_excl(hook, flags); > > > +} > > > + > > > +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, > > > + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush); > > > + > > > +int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) > > > +{ > > > + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || > > > + OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { > > > > int casting. Did the compiler complain about that or what? > > > > It complains on -Wswitch, as we switch on values apart from the enum values, but > I'll see if I can remove it. ah, because of BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS? That sucks, of course. An alternative I guess is just declaring BPF_TC_INGRESS_EGRESS = BPF_TC_INGRESS | BPF_TC_EGRESS, but I don't know how awful that would be. > > > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: > > > + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > > + return tc_cls_detach(hook, NULL, true); > > > + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: > > > + return tc_qdisc_delete(hook); > > > + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > + default: > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + } > > > +} > > > + [...]
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:24:05AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:32 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 01:05:40AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: [...] > > > > > > why didn't you put flags into bpf_tc_opts? they are clearly optional > > > and fit into "opts" paradigm... > > > > > > > I can move this into opts, but during previous discussion it was kept outside > > opts by Daniel, so I kept that unchanged. > > for bpf_tc_attach() I see no reason to keep flags separate. For > bpf_tc_hook_create()... for extensibility it would need it's own opts > for hook creation. But if flags is 99% the only thing we'll need, then > we can always add extra bpf_tc_hook_create_opts() later. > I'll put flags in the respective opts struct for both. The hook creation path was kept generic enough so that this can be extended to complex qdisc setup in the future than just clsact (even classful qdiscs should be possible). So it is quite possible for bpf_tc_hook to take more parameters than just flags by mapping different attach_point to different qdiscs. Given some parameters are already optional depending on attach_point, it is probably better to put flags in opts than dropping opts for now. -- Kartikeya
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h index bec4e6a6e31d..3de701f46a33 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h @@ -775,6 +775,47 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__add_file(struct bpf_linker *linker, const char *filen LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__finalize(struct bpf_linker *linker); LIBBPF_API void bpf_linker__free(struct bpf_linker *linker); +enum bpf_tc_attach_point { + BPF_TC_INGRESS = 1 << 0, + BPF_TC_EGRESS = 1 << 1, + BPF_TC_CUSTOM = 1 << 2, +}; + +enum bpf_tc_attach_flags { + BPF_TC_F_REPLACE = 1 << 0, +}; + +struct bpf_tc_hook { + size_t sz; + int ifindex; + enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point; + __u32 parent; + size_t :0; +}; + +#define bpf_tc_hook__last_field parent + +struct bpf_tc_opts { + size_t sz; + int prog_fd; + __u32 prog_id; + __u32 handle; + __u32 priority; + size_t :0; +}; + +#define bpf_tc_opts__last_field priority + +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags); +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook); +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, + int flags); +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); +LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts); + #ifdef __cplusplus } /* extern "C" */ #endif diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map index b9b29baf1df8..04509c7c144b 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map @@ -361,4 +361,9 @@ LIBBPF_0.4.0 { bpf_linker__new; bpf_map__inner_map; bpf_object__set_kversion; + bpf_tc_hook_create; + bpf_tc_hook_destroy; + bpf_tc_attach; + bpf_tc_detach; + bpf_tc_query; } LIBBPF_0.3.0; diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c index 6daee6640725..88f7b6144c78 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c @@ -4,7 +4,11 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <memory.h> #include <unistd.h> +#include <inttypes.h> +#include <arpa/inet.h> #include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <linux/if_ether.h> +#include <linux/pkt_cls.h> #include <linux/rtnetlink.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <errno.h> @@ -73,6 +77,12 @@ static int libbpf_netlink_open(__u32 *nl_pid) return ret; } +enum { + BPF_NL_CONT, + BPF_NL_NEXT, + BPF_NL_DONE, +}; + static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, __dump_nlmsg_t _fn, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, void *cookie) @@ -84,6 +94,7 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, int len, ret; while (multipart) { +start: multipart = false; len = recv(sock, buf, sizeof(buf), 0); if (len < 0) { @@ -121,8 +132,18 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq, } if (_fn) { ret = _fn(nh, fn, cookie); - if (ret) + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + switch (ret) { + case BPF_NL_CONT: + break; + case BPF_NL_NEXT: + goto start; + case BPF_NL_DONE: + return 0; + default: return ret; + } } } } @@ -357,3 +378,443 @@ static int libbpf_nl_send_recv(struct nlmsghdr *nh, __dump_nlmsg_t fn, close(sock); return ret; } + +/* TC-HOOK */ + +typedef int (*qdisc_config_t)(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, + size_t maxsz); + +static int clsact_config(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, size_t maxsz) +{ + int ret; + + t->tcm_parent = TC_H_CLSACT; + t->tcm_handle = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, 0); + + ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_KIND, "clsact", sizeof("clsact")); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static int attach_point_to_config(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, qdisc_config_t *configp) +{ + if (!hook) + return -EINVAL; + + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: + if (OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)) + return -EINVAL; + *configp = &clsact_config; + break; + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + return 0; +} + +static long long int tc_get_tcm_parent(enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point, + __u32 parent) +{ + long long int ret; + + switch (attach_point) { + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: + if (parent) + return -EINVAL; + ret = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_INGRESS); + break; + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: + if (parent) + return -EINVAL; + ret = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_EGRESS); + break; + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: + if (!parent) + return -EINVAL; + ret = parent; + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + return ret; +} + +static int tc_qdisc_modify(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int cmd, int flags) +{ + qdisc_config_t config; + int ret = 0; + struct { + struct nlmsghdr nh; + struct tcmsg t; + char buf[256]; + } req; + + ret = attach_point_to_config(hook, &config); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = + NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | flags; + req.nh.nlmsg_type = cmd; + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); + + ret = config(&req.nh, &req.t, sizeof(req)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + +static int tc_qdisc_create_excl(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags) +{ + flags = flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL; + return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_NEWQDISC, NLM_F_CREATE | flags); +} + +static int tc_qdisc_delete(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) +{ + return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_DELQDISC, 0); +} + +int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int flags) +{ + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook)) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) + return -EINVAL; + + return tc_qdisc_create_excl(hook, flags); +} + +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush); + +int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook) +{ + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || + OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0) + return -EINVAL; + + switch ((int)OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) { + case BPF_TC_INGRESS: + case BPF_TC_EGRESS: + return tc_cls_detach(hook, NULL, true); + case BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS: + return tc_qdisc_delete(hook); + case BPF_TC_CUSTOM: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } +} + +struct pass_info { + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts; + __u32 match_prog_id; + bool processed; +}; + +/* TC-BPF */ + +static int tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t maxsz, int fd) +{ + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; + char name[256] = {}; + int len, ret; + + ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &(__u32){sizeof(info)}); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_FD, &fd, sizeof(fd)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + len = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:[%" PRIu32 "]", info.name, + info.id); + if (len < 0 || len >= sizeof(name)) + return len < 0 ? -EINVAL : -ENAMETOOLONG; + + return nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_NAME, name, len + 1); +} + + +static int cls_get_info(struct nlmsghdr *nh, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, + void *cookie); + +int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, int flags) +{ + __u32 protocol = 0, bpf_flags; + struct pass_info info = {}; + long long int tcm_parent; + struct nlattr *nla; + int ret; + struct { + struct nlmsghdr nh; + struct tcmsg t; + char buf[256]; + } req; + + if (!hook || !opts || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_opts) || + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || !OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) || + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0)) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + if (flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) + return -EINVAL; + + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; + flags = flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL; + + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = + NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_ECHO | flags; + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_NEWTFILTER; + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, htons(protocol)); + + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); + if (tcm_parent < 0) + return tcm_parent; + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; + + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + nla = nlattr_begin_nested(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_OPTIONS); + if (!nla) + return -EMSGSIZE; + + ret = tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(&req.nh, sizeof(req), OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + /* direct action mode is always enabled */ + bpf_flags = TCA_BPF_FLAG_ACT_DIRECT; + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_BPF_FLAGS, + &bpf_flags, sizeof(bpf_flags)); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + nlattr_end_nested(&req.nh, nla); + + info.opts = opts; + + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, &cls_get_info, NULL, &info); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + /* Failed to process unicast response */ + if (!info.processed) + ret = -ENOENT; + + return ret; +} + +static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts, bool flush) +{ + long long int tcm_parent; + __u32 protocol = 0; + int ret, c; + struct { + struct nlmsghdr nh; + struct tcmsg t; + char buf[256]; + } req; + + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_opts) || + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) || + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0)) + return -EINVAL; + c = !!OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0) + !!OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0); + if ((flush && c != 0) || (!flush && c != 2)) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!flush) + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; + + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK; + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_DELTFILTER; + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; + if (!flush) + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); + if (!flush) + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, + htons(protocol)); + + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); + if (tcm_parent < 0) + return tcm_parent; + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; + + if (!flush) { + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + + return libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL); +} + +int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts) +{ + if (!opts) + return -EINVAL; + + return tc_cls_detach(hook, opts, false); +} + +static int __cls_get_info(void *cookie, void *msg, struct nlattr **tb, + bool unicast) +{ + struct nlattr *tbb[TCA_BPF_MAX + 1]; + struct pass_info *info = cookie; + struct tcmsg *t = msg; + __u32 prog_id; + + if (!info) + return -EINVAL; + if (unicast && info->processed) + return -EINVAL; + if (!tb[TCA_OPTIONS]) + return BPF_NL_CONT; + + libbpf_nla_parse_nested(tbb, TCA_BPF_MAX, tb[TCA_OPTIONS], NULL); + if (!tbb[TCA_BPF_ID]) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!info->opts) { + /* This is a special case, where user isn't really looking for + * info for the filter, but just wants to detect if there's + * atleast one attached. In that case, terminate processing as a + * short cut. + */ + if (unicast) + return -EINVAL; + goto end; + } + + prog_id = libbpf_nla_getattr_u32(tbb[TCA_BPF_ID]); + if (info->match_prog_id && info->match_prog_id != prog_id) + return BPF_NL_CONT; + + OPTS_SET(info->opts, handle, t->tcm_handle); + OPTS_SET(info->opts, priority, TC_H_MAJ(t->tcm_info) >> 16); + OPTS_SET(info->opts, prog_id, prog_id); + +end: + info->processed = true; + return unicast ? BPF_NL_NEXT : BPF_NL_DONE; +} + +static int cls_get_info(struct nlmsghdr *nh, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, + void *cookie) +{ + struct tcmsg *t = NLMSG_DATA(nh); + struct nlattr *tb[TCA_MAX + 1]; + + libbpf_nla_parse(tb, TCA_MAX, + (struct nlattr *)((char *)t + NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(*t))), + NLMSG_PAYLOAD(nh, sizeof(*t)), NULL); + if (!tb[TCA_KIND]) + return -EINVAL; + + return __cls_get_info(cookie, t, tb, nh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ECHO); +} + +int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, + struct bpf_tc_opts *opts) +{ + struct pass_info pinfo = {}; + long long int tcm_parent; + __u32 protocol; + int ret; + struct { + struct nlmsghdr nh; + struct tcmsg t; + char buf[256]; + } req; + + if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || + !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts)) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0 || (OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0) && + OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0))) + return -EINVAL; + if (OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) > UINT16_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + + protocol = ETH_P_ALL; + + memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req)); + req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg)); + req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_DUMP; + req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_GETTFILTER; + req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC; + req.t.tcm_handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0); + req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0); + req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0) << 16, htons(protocol)); + + tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0), OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0)); + if (tcm_parent < 0) + return tcm_parent; + req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent; + + ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf")); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if (OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0)) { + struct bpf_prog_info info = {}; + ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0), &info, &(__u32){sizeof(info)}); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + pinfo.match_prog_id = info.id; + } else + pinfo.match_prog_id = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0); + + pinfo.opts = opts; + + ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, cls_get_info, NULL, &pinfo); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if (!pinfo.processed) + ret = -ENOENT; + + return ret; +}