From patchwork Sun May 2 16:22:52 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ido Schimmel X-Patchwork-Id: 12235297 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A1BC433B4 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 16:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D45C61352 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 16:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232360AbhEBQZq (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 12:25:46 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:51159 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230110AbhEBQZp (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 12:25:45 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8AF5C0135; Sun, 2 May 2021 12:24:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 May 2021 12:24:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=5EzNwX5cPveEgm3tihSJJobXk46uSK4/sZLomhcpN1s=; b=BUwHq+LN VTMZNrz2si4i+uv1iFC8n1GgYVaduZ6+m0JnxunhMI1QsdO6d9oskDQp40gWv7sE 2MPSok1OBxBakfsP9jO2mgtvT1TkLO7vGxSFH/EwubZ7Er0uFq28KExN6FJpnO/V 7GCMiGmekBo8m4kt2ARYiRK43rt5wLrp1eIQMTLVqQz+sfen8THu6mtloLonlPv1 bDAMquHw/xe9ItHCDXOFFv6+rk+nmTjeWSPlNw/e1hT1H7atJpmGie6Dm25Bqab8 MiIu4FwBfocuPAW4W9FV7CmDthRGOrbL3GtAeaijeXWaVbGBkVp6cwkvebRFUqyL SHg6RcVTdpC9WQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefvddgtdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekre dtredttdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiugho shgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudetieevffffveelkeeljeffkefhke ehgfdtffethfelvdejgffghefgveejkefhnecukfhppeduleefrdegjedrudeihedrvdeh udenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiug hoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from shredder.mellanox.com (unknown [193.47.165.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 2 May 2021 12:24:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Ido Schimmel To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com, petrm@nvidia.com, roopa@nvidia.com, nikolay@nvidia.com, ssuryaextr@gmail.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com, Ido Schimmel Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 05/10] ipv6: Calculate multipath hash inside switch statement Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 19:22:52 +0300 Message-Id: <20210502162257.3472453-6-idosch@idosch.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210502162257.3472453-1-idosch@idosch.org> References: <20210502162257.3472453-1-idosch@idosch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org X-Patchwork-State: RFC From: Ido Schimmel A subsequent patch will add another multipath hash policy where the multipath hash is calculated directly by the policy specific code and not outside of the switch statement. Prepare for this change by moving the multipath hash calculation inside the switch statement. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel --- net/ipv6/route.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index a22822bdbf39..9935e18146e5 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, const struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow_keys *flkeys) { struct flow_keys hash_keys; - u32 mhash; + u32 mhash = 0; switch (ip6_multipath_hash_policy(net)) { case 0: @@ -2345,6 +2345,7 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, hash_keys.tags.flow_label = (__force u32)flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6); hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl6->flowi6_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; case 1: if (skb) { @@ -2376,6 +2377,7 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, hash_keys.ports.dst = fl6->fl6_dport; hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl6->flowi6_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; case 2: memset(&hash_keys, 0, sizeof(hash_keys)); @@ -2412,9 +2414,9 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, hash_keys.tags.flow_label = (__force u32)flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6); hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl6->flowi6_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; } - mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); return mhash >> 1; }