From patchwork Sun May 9 15:16:10 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ido Schimmel X-Patchwork-Id: 12246441 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0B1C433ED for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 15:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE57613D9 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 15:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229761AbhEIPS6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 11:18:58 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51179 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229753AbhEIPSx (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 11:18:53 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5482D5C00E7; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:17:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 May 2021 11:17:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=TO5bqtpQ1yrDlW9PElnLc8+tb3/i2nsyVx4KW06TjB0=; b=cRKHLzJ+ HAP/3IcuMjPf8U9l62vW83xDL09EHQM+BE2O2Tt0F9NH88ur1TQINyKZC+TqlHqh CcO3i9MfQRuWUemBvcVOf5O9VODCgz/kDz+WpdeV5T9iioDkEEx95UHlb+6JmAGn dq9CO/DN3ecmF6uYdyQiEA0wCJlqcAhGG+MUFEJGPdzgUMGYGoVjIBpc0lckq4Hx EIylmxPIEuwS2QSVUQHxjitZC+Z3PGgLJfhBiAD01MilHlz1b9DOvJ6J53lieDxk tKOHL+tnm6K1gXNBXl/+q2tCvif02UsIDUlqQ64zdidwOUIFUgUZc77IDicmqZSN t739Ze+mMbe7og== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdegiedgkeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekre dtredttdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiugho shgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudetieevffffveelkeeljeffkefhke ehgfdtffethfelvdejgffghefgveejkefhnecukfhppeduleefrdegjedrudeihedrvdeh udenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiug hoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from shredder.mellanox.com (unknown [193.47.165.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:17:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Ido Schimmel To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com, petrm@nvidia.com, roopa@nvidia.com, nikolay@nvidia.com, ssuryaextr@gmail.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com, Ido Schimmel Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 05/10] ipv6: Calculate multipath hash inside switch statement Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 18:16:10 +0300 Message-Id: <20210509151615.200608-6-idosch@idosch.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210509151615.200608-1-idosch@idosch.org> References: <20210509151615.200608-1-idosch@idosch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org X-Patchwork-State: RFC From: Ido Schimmel A subsequent patch will add another multipath hash policy where the multipath hash is calculated directly by the policy specific code and not outside of the switch statement. Prepare for this change by moving the multipath hash calculation inside the switch statement. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel --- net/ipv6/route.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index a22822bdbf39..9935e18146e5 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -2331,7 +2331,7 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, const struct sk_buff *skb, struct flow_keys *flkeys) { struct flow_keys hash_keys; - u32 mhash; + u32 mhash = 0; switch (ip6_multipath_hash_policy(net)) { case 0: @@ -2345,6 +2345,7 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, hash_keys.tags.flow_label = (__force u32)flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6); hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl6->flowi6_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; case 1: if (skb) { @@ -2376,6 +2377,7 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, hash_keys.ports.dst = fl6->fl6_dport; hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl6->flowi6_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; case 2: memset(&hash_keys, 0, sizeof(hash_keys)); @@ -2412,9 +2414,9 @@ u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6, hash_keys.tags.flow_label = (__force u32)flowi6_get_flowlabel(fl6); hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl6->flowi6_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; } - mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); return mhash >> 1; }