| Message ID | 20210608133007.69476-1-wanghai38@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 96bffe70231c871d1b39ecc44288c96bed66422b |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net-next] net: x25: Use list_for_each_entry() to simplify code in x25_forward.c | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 5 of 5 maintainers |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:30:07 +0000 you wrote: > Convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() where > applicable. This simplifies the code. > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> > --- > net/x25/x25_forward.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Here is the summary with links: - [net-next] net: x25: Use list_for_each_entry() to simplify code in x25_forward.c https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/96bffe70231c You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_forward.c b/net/x25/x25_forward.c index d48ad6d29197..21b30b56e889 100644 --- a/net/x25/x25_forward.c +++ b/net/x25/x25_forward.c @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, { struct x25_route *rt; struct x25_neigh *neigh_new = NULL; - struct list_head *entry; struct x25_forward *x25_frwd, *new_frwd; struct sk_buff *skbn; short same_lci = 0; @@ -46,8 +45,7 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, * established LCI? It shouldn't happen, just in case.. */ read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) { - x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node); + list_for_each_entry(x25_frwd, &x25_forward_list, node) { if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) { pr_warn("call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n"); same_lci = 1; @@ -92,15 +90,13 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from, int x25_forward_data(int lci, struct x25_neigh *from, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct x25_forward *frwd; - struct list_head *entry; struct net_device *peer = NULL; struct x25_neigh *nb; struct sk_buff *skbn; int rc = 0; read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock); - list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) { - frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node); + list_for_each_entry(frwd, &x25_forward_list, node) { if (frwd->lci == lci) { /* The call is established, either side can send */ if (from->dev == frwd->dev1) {
Convert list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry() where applicable. This simplifies the code. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com> --- net/x25/x25_forward.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)