diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,04/19] bpf: allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context

Message ID 20210623110727.221922-5-toke@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Clean up and document RCU-based object protection for XDP and TC BPF | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next

Commit Message

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen June 23, 2021, 11:07 a.m. UTC 
XDP programs are called from a NAPI poll context, which means the RCU
reference liveness is ensured by local_bh_disable(). Add
rcu_read_lock_bh_held() as a condition to the RCU checks for map lookups so
lockdep understands that the dereferences are safe from inside *either* an
rcu_read_lock() section *or* a local_bh_disable() section. While both
bh_disabled and rcu_read_lock() provide RCU protection, they are
semantically distinct, so we need both conditions to prevent lockdep
complaints.

This change is done in preparation for removing the redundant
rcu_read_lock()s from drivers.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c  | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c  |  6 +++---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c |  6 ++++--
 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 6f6681b07364..72c58cc516a3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -596,7 +596,8 @@  static void *__htab_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	struct htab_elem *l;
 	u32 hash, key_size;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -989,7 +990,8 @@  static int htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1082,7 +1084,8 @@  static int htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1148,7 +1151,8 @@  static int __htab_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1202,7 +1206,8 @@  static int __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 		/* unknown flags */
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1276,7 +1281,8 @@  static int htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	u32 hash, key_size;
 	int ret;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
@@ -1311,7 +1317,8 @@  static int htab_lru_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
 	u32 hash, key_size;
 	int ret;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
+		     !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 
 	key_size = map->key_size;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 544773970dbc..e880f6bb6f28 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ 
  */
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 	return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
 }
 
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
 BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key,
 	   void *, value, u64, flags)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 	return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
 }
 
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@  const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
 
 BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 	return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index 1b7b8a6f34ee..423549d2c52e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -232,7 +232,8 @@  static void *trie_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key)
 
 	/* Start walking the trie from the root node ... */
 
-	for (node = rcu_dereference(trie->root); node;) {
+	for (node = rcu_dereference_check(trie->root, rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+	     node;) {
 		unsigned int next_bit;
 		size_t matchlen;
 
@@ -264,7 +265,8 @@  static void *trie_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key)
 		 * traverse down.
 		 */
 		next_bit = extract_bit(key->data, node->prefixlen);
-		node = rcu_dereference(node->child[next_bit]);
+		node = rcu_dereference_check(node->child[next_bit],
+					     rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
 	}
 
 	if (!found)