diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v5,03/11] af_unix: implement ->read_sock() for sockmap

Message ID 20210704190252.11866-4-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series sockmap: add sockmap support for unix datagram socket | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 13 maintainers not CCed: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org andrii@kernel.org kafai@fb.com jamorris@linux.microsoft.com ast@kernel.org orcohen2006@gmail.com songliubraving@fb.com christian.brauner@ubuntu.com aahringo@redhat.com davem@davemloft.net kuba@kernel.org
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 55 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 4 this patch: 4
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Cong Wang July 4, 2021, 7:02 p.m. UTC
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>

Implement ->read_sock() for AF_UNIX datagram socket, it is
pretty much similar to udp_read_sock().

Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

Comments

John Fastabend July 12, 2021, 5:04 p.m. UTC | #1
Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> 
> Implement ->read_sock() for AF_UNIX datagram socket, it is
> pretty much similar to udp_read_sock().
> 
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> ---

[...]

> +static int unix_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
> +			  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
> +{
> +	int copied = 0;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
> +		struct sk_buff *skb;
> +		int used, err;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
> +		skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, 0, 1, &err);
> +		mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
> +		if (!skb)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		used = recv_actor(desc, skb, 0, skb->len);
> +		if (used <= 0) {
> +			if (!copied)
> +				copied = used;
> +			kfree_skb(skb);

Is it OK to drop a unix dgram? I think the sockets likely wouldn't
expect this?

Anyways I'll have a proposed fix for TCP side shortly. And we can
extend it here as well if needed.

> +			break;
> +		} else if (used <= skb->len) {
> +			copied += used;
> +		}
> +
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +		if (!desc->count)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return copied;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   *	Sleep until more data has arrived. But check for races..
>   */
> -- 
> 2.27.0
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 23c92ad15c61..38863468768a 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -669,6 +669,8 @@  static ssize_t unix_stream_splice_read(struct socket *,  loff_t *ppos,
 				       unsigned int flags);
 static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *, size_t);
 static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *, size_t, int);
+static int unix_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor);
 static int unix_dgram_connect(struct socket *, struct sockaddr *,
 			      int, int);
 static int unix_seqpacket_sendmsg(struct socket *, struct msghdr *, size_t);
@@ -746,6 +748,7 @@  static const struct proto_ops unix_dgram_ops = {
 	.listen =	sock_no_listen,
 	.shutdown =	unix_shutdown,
 	.sendmsg =	unix_dgram_sendmsg,
+	.read_sock =	unix_read_sock,
 	.recvmsg =	unix_dgram_recvmsg,
 	.mmap =		sock_no_mmap,
 	.sendpage =	sock_no_sendpage,
@@ -2188,6 +2191,40 @@  static int unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int unix_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
+			  sk_read_actor_t recv_actor)
+{
+	int copied = 0;
+
+	while (1) {
+		struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
+		struct sk_buff *skb;
+		int used, err;
+
+		mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
+		skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, 0, 1, &err);
+		mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
+		if (!skb)
+			return err;
+
+		used = recv_actor(desc, skb, 0, skb->len);
+		if (used <= 0) {
+			if (!copied)
+				copied = used;
+			kfree_skb(skb);
+			break;
+		} else if (used <= skb->len) {
+			copied += used;
+		}
+
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		if (!desc->count)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return copied;
+}
+
 /*
  *	Sleep until more data has arrived. But check for races..
  */