Message ID | 20210728105423.1064-1-broonie@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply |
Hi, Mark: On 2021/7/28 18:54, Mark Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c > > between commit: > > 801e541c79bb ("nfc: s3fwrn5: fix undefined parameter values in dev_err()") Yesterday, I have send this patch to fix the problem. And nathan proposed another way to fix this problem, so I send v2 for maintainer today. And waiting for the result. Thanks Tang Bin > > from the net tree and commit: > > a0302ff5906a ("nfc: s3fwrn5: remove unnecessary label") > > from the net-next tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > diff --cc drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c > index 1340fab9565e,1421ffd46d9a..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c > +++ b/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c > @@@ -421,10 -421,9 +421,9 @@@ int s3fwrn5_fw_download(struct s3fwrn5_ > > tfm = crypto_alloc_shash("sha1", 0, 0); > if (IS_ERR(tfm)) { > - ret = PTR_ERR(tfm); > dev_err(&fw_info->ndev->nfc_dev->dev, > - "Cannot allocate shash (code=%d)\n", ret); > + "Cannot allocate shash (code=%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(tfm)); > - goto out; > + return PTR_ERR(tfm); > } > > ret = crypto_shash_tfm_digest(tfm, fw->image, image_size, hash_data);
diff --cc drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c index 1340fab9565e,1421ffd46d9a..000000000000 --- a/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c