diff mbox series

[net-next,v3,5/6] net: dsa: qca: ar9331: add bridge support

Message ID 20210802131037.32326-6-o.rempel@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series ar9331: mainline some parts of switch functionality | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: linux@rempel-privat.de
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Oleksij Rempel Aug. 2, 2021, 1:10 p.m. UTC 
This switch is providing forwarding matrix, with it we can configure
individual bridges. Potentially we can configure more than one not VLAN
based bridge on this HW.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)

Comments

Vladimir Oltean Aug. 2, 2021, 2:55 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This switch is providing forwarding matrix, with it we can configure
> individual bridges. Potentially we can configure more than one not VLAN
> based bridge on this HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
> index d726d2f223ea..a0324fed2136 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/if_bridge.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/of_mdio.h>
> @@ -1093,6 +1094,56 @@ static int ar9331_sw_set_ageing_time(struct dsa_switch *ds,
>  				  val);
>  }
>  
> +static int ar9331_sw_port_bridge_mod(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> +				     struct net_device *br, bool join)
> +{
> +	struct ar9331_sw_priv *priv = (struct ar9331_sw_priv *)ds->priv;
> +	struct regmap *regmap = priv->regmap;

Reverse Christmas tree notation..

> +	int port_mask = BIT(dsa_to_port(ds, port)->cpu_dp->index);

Could you use dsa_upstream_port(ds, port) instead of raw access to cpu_dp?
Or alternatively, you can add another condition in your "for" loop, for
dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port) => port_mask |= BIT(i);

> +	int i, ret;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) {
> +		if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev != br)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
> +			continue;

Only user ports can have a ->bridge_dev pointer populated in the first place.
Also, did you mean dsa_is_user_port(ds, i)? The "port" variable is an
invariant as far as this loop is concerned.

> +
> +		val = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, BIT(port));
> +		ret = regmap_set_bits(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_VLAN(i), val);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto error;
> +
> +		if (join && i != port)
> +			port_mask |= BIT(i);
> +	}
> +
> +	val = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, port_mask);
> +	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_VLAN(port),
> +				 AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, val);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +error:
> +	dev_err(priv->dev, "%s: error: %i\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ar9331_sw_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> +				      struct net_device *br)
> +{
> +	return ar9331_sw_port_bridge_mod(ds, port, br, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void ar9331_sw_port_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> +					struct net_device *br)
> +{
> +	ar9331_sw_port_bridge_mod(ds, port, br, false);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct dsa_switch_ops ar9331_sw_ops = {
>  	.get_tag_protocol	= ar9331_sw_get_tag_protocol,
>  	.setup			= ar9331_sw_setup,
> @@ -1109,6 +1160,8 @@ static const struct dsa_switch_ops ar9331_sw_ops = {
>  	.port_mdb_add           = ar9331_sw_port_mdb_add,
>  	.port_mdb_del           = ar9331_sw_port_mdb_del,
>  	.set_ageing_time	= ar9331_sw_set_ageing_time,
> +	.port_bridge_join	= ar9331_sw_port_bridge_join,
> +	.port_bridge_leave	= ar9331_sw_port_bridge_leave,
>  };
>  
>  static irqreturn_t ar9331_sw_irq(int irq, void *data)
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>
Vladimir Oltean Aug. 7, 2021, 11:08 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Oleksij,

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This switch is providing forwarding matrix, with it we can configure
> individual bridges. Potentially we can configure more than one not VLAN
> based bridge on this HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---

I don't see anywhere in this patch or in this series that the
tag_ar9331.c file is being patched to set skb->offload_fwd_mark to true
for packets sent (flooded) to the CPU that have already been forwarded
by the hardware switch. If the software bridge sees a broadcast packet
coming from your driver and it has offload_fwd_mark = false, it will
forward it a second time and the other nodes in your network will see
duplicates.
Oleksij Rempel Aug. 9, 2021, 5:04 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 02:08:29AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi Oleksij,
> 
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > This switch is providing forwarding matrix, with it we can configure
> > individual bridges. Potentially we can configure more than one not VLAN
> > based bridge on this HW.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> I don't see anywhere in this patch or in this series that the
> tag_ar9331.c file is being patched to set skb->offload_fwd_mark to true
> for packets sent (flooded) to the CPU that have already been forwarded
> by the hardware switch. If the software bridge sees a broadcast packet
> coming from your driver and it has offload_fwd_mark = false, it will
> forward it a second time and the other nodes in your network will see
> duplicates.

Ok, thank you, I'll take a look on it.

Regards,
Oleksij
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
index d726d2f223ea..a0324fed2136 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ 
  */
 
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/if_bridge.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_mdio.h>
@@ -1093,6 +1094,56 @@  static int ar9331_sw_set_ageing_time(struct dsa_switch *ds,
 				  val);
 }
 
+static int ar9331_sw_port_bridge_mod(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+				     struct net_device *br, bool join)
+{
+	struct ar9331_sw_priv *priv = (struct ar9331_sw_priv *)ds->priv;
+	struct regmap *regmap = priv->regmap;
+	int port_mask = BIT(dsa_to_port(ds, port)->cpu_dp->index);
+	int i, ret;
+	u32 val;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) {
+		if (dsa_to_port(ds, i)->bridge_dev != br)
+			continue;
+
+		if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
+			continue;
+
+		val = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, BIT(port));
+		ret = regmap_set_bits(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_VLAN(i), val);
+		if (ret)
+			goto error;
+
+		if (join && i != port)
+			port_mask |= BIT(i);
+	}
+
+	val = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, port_mask);
+	ret = regmap_update_bits(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_VLAN(port),
+				 AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, val);
+	if (ret)
+		goto error;
+
+	return 0;
+error:
+	dev_err(priv->dev, "%s: error: %i\n", __func__, ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int ar9331_sw_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+				      struct net_device *br)
+{
+	return ar9331_sw_port_bridge_mod(ds, port, br, true);
+}
+
+static void ar9331_sw_port_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+					struct net_device *br)
+{
+	ar9331_sw_port_bridge_mod(ds, port, br, false);
+}
+
 static const struct dsa_switch_ops ar9331_sw_ops = {
 	.get_tag_protocol	= ar9331_sw_get_tag_protocol,
 	.setup			= ar9331_sw_setup,
@@ -1109,6 +1160,8 @@  static const struct dsa_switch_ops ar9331_sw_ops = {
 	.port_mdb_add           = ar9331_sw_port_mdb_add,
 	.port_mdb_del           = ar9331_sw_port_mdb_del,
 	.set_ageing_time	= ar9331_sw_set_ageing_time,
+	.port_bridge_join	= ar9331_sw_port_bridge_join,
+	.port_bridge_leave	= ar9331_sw_port_bridge_leave,
 };
 
 static irqreturn_t ar9331_sw_irq(int irq, void *data)