| Message ID | 20210805230734.437914-1-andrii@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 579345e7f2190c1ee97f44154526dcd458ea790d |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: rename reference_tracking BPF programs | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for bpf-next |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | warning | 9 maintainers not CCed: netdev@vger.kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org toke@redhat.com shuah@kernel.org songliubraving@fb.com yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org kafai@fb.com |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | warning | CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "strstr" |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 16:07:34 -0700 you wrote: > BPF programs for reference_tracking selftest use "fail_" prefix to notify that > they are expected to fail. This is really confusing and inconvenient when > trying to grep through test_progs output to find *actually* failed tests. So > rename the prefix from "fail_" to "err_". > > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: rename reference_tracking BPF programs https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/579345e7f219 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c index de2688166696..4e91f4d6466c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ void test_reference_tracking(void) if (!test__start_subtest(title)) continue; - /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'fail' */ - if (strstr(title, "fail") != NULL) { + /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'err' */ + if (strstr(title, "err_") != NULL) { libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_fn; old_print_fn = libbpf_set_print(NULL); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c index e83d0b48d80c..8249075f088f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_use_after_free") +SEC("classifier/err_use_after_free") int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) return family; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release") int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_twice") +SEC("classifier/err_release_twice") int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_unchecked") +SEC("classifier/err_release_unchecked") int bpf_sk_lookup_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void lookup_no_release(struct __sk_buff *skb) bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(skb, &tuple, sizeof(tuple), BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS, 0); } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release_subcall") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release_subcall") int bpf_sk_lookup_test5(struct __sk_buff *skb) { lookup_no_release(skb);
BPF programs for reference_tracking selftest use "fail_" prefix to notify that they are expected to fail. This is really confusing and inconvenient when trying to grep through test_progs output to find *actually* failed tests. So rename the prefix from "fail_" to "err_". Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c | 4 ++-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)