@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
void test_trace_printk(void)
{
- int err, iter = 0, duration = 0, found = 0;
+ int err = 0, iter = 0, found = 0;
struct trace_printk__bss *bss;
struct trace_printk *skel;
char *buf = NULL;
@@ -18,25 +18,24 @@ void test_trace_printk(void)
size_t buflen;
skel = trace_printk__open();
- if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open skeleton\n"))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "trace_printk__open"))
return;
- ASSERT_EQ(skel->rodata->fmt[0], 'T', "invalid printk fmt string");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->rodata->fmt[0], 'T', "skel->rodata->fmt[0]");
skel->rodata->fmt[0] = 't';
err = trace_printk__load(skel);
- if (CHECK(err, "skel_load", "failed to load skeleton: %d\n", err))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "trace_printk__load"))
goto cleanup;
bss = skel->bss;
err = trace_printk__attach(skel);
- if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "trace_printk__attach"))
goto cleanup;
fp = fopen(TRACEBUF, "r");
- if (CHECK(fp == NULL, "could not open trace buffer",
- "error %d opening %s", errno, TRACEBUF))
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fp, "fopen(TRACEBUF)"))
goto cleanup;
/* We do not want to wait forever if this test fails... */
@@ -46,14 +45,10 @@ void test_trace_printk(void)
usleep(1);
trace_printk__detach(skel);
- if (CHECK(bss->trace_printk_ran == 0,
- "bpf_trace_printk never ran",
- "ran == %d", bss->trace_printk_ran))
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(bss->trace_printk_ran, 0, "bss->trace_printk_ran"))
goto cleanup;
- if (CHECK(bss->trace_printk_ret <= 0,
- "bpf_trace_printk returned <= 0 value",
- "got %d", bss->trace_printk_ret))
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(bss->trace_printk_ret, 0, "bss->trace_printk_ret"))
goto cleanup;
/* verify our search string is in the trace buffer */
@@ -66,8 +61,7 @@ void test_trace_printk(void)
break;
}
- if (CHECK(!found, "message from bpf_trace_printk not found",
- "no instance of %s in %s", SEARCHMSG, TRACEBUF))
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(found, bss->trace_printk_ran, "found"))
goto cleanup;
cleanup:
Guidance for new tests is to use ASSERT macros instead of CHECK. Since trace_vprintk test will borrow heavily from trace_printk's, migrate its CHECKs so it remains obvious that the two are closely related. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c | 24 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)