Message ID | 20210929033000.3711921-1-yhs@fb.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: fix probe_user test failure with clang build kernel | expand |
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:30 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote: > > clang build kernel failed the selftest probe_user. > $ ./test_progs -t probe_user > $ ... > $ test_probe_user:PASS:get_kprobe_res 0 nsec > $ test_probe_user:FAIL:check_kprobe_res wrong kprobe res from probe read: 0.0.0.0:0 > $ #94 probe_user:FAIL > > The test attached to kernel function __sys_connect(). In net/socket.c, we have > int __sys_connect(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *uservaddr, int addrlen) > { > ...... > } > ... > SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr, > int, addrlen) > { > return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen); > } > > The gcc compiler (8.5.0) does not inline __sys_connect() in syscall entry > function. But latest clang trunk did the inlining. So the bpf program > is not triggered. > > To make the test more reliable, let us kprobe the syscall entry function > instead. Note that x86_64, arm64 and s390 have syscall wrappers and they have > to be handled specially. > > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> > --- Applied to bpf-next, thanks. > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c | 4 +-- > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > [...]
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c index 95bd12097358..52fe157e2a90 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ void test_probe_user(void) { - const char *prog_name = "kprobe/__sys_connect"; + const char *prog_name = "handle_sys_connect"; const char *obj_file = "./test_probe_user.o"; DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts, ); int err, results_map_fd, sock_fd, duration = 0; @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void test_probe_user(void) if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(obj, "obj_open_file")) return; - kprobe_prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_title(obj, prog_name); + kprobe_prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_name); if (CHECK(!kprobe_prog, "find_probe", "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_name)) goto cleanup; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c index 89b3532ccc75..8812a90da4eb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c @@ -8,13 +8,37 @@ #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> +#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) +#define SYSCALL_WRAPPER 1 +#define SYS_PREFIX "__x64_" +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_s390) +#define SYSCALL_WRAPPER 1 +#define SYS_PREFIX "__s390x_" +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64) +#define SYSCALL_WRAPPER 1 +#define SYS_PREFIX "__arm64_" +#else +#define SYSCALL_WRAPPER 0 +#define SYS_PREFIX "" +#endif + static struct sockaddr_in old; -SEC("kprobe/__sys_connect") +SEC("kprobe/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_connect") int BPF_KPROBE(handle_sys_connect) { - void *ptr = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx); +#if SYSCALL_WRAPPER == 1 + struct pt_regs *real_regs; +#endif struct sockaddr_in new; + void *ptr; + +#if SYSCALL_WRAPPER == 0 + ptr = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx); +#else + real_regs = (struct pt_regs *)PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx); + bpf_probe_read_kernel(&ptr, sizeof(ptr), &PT_REGS_PARM2(real_regs)); +#endif bpf_probe_read_user(&old, sizeof(old), ptr); __builtin_memset(&new, 0xab, sizeof(new));
clang build kernel failed the selftest probe_user. $ ./test_progs -t probe_user $ ... $ test_probe_user:PASS:get_kprobe_res 0 nsec $ test_probe_user:FAIL:check_kprobe_res wrong kprobe res from probe read: 0.0.0.0:0 $ #94 probe_user:FAIL The test attached to kernel function __sys_connect(). In net/socket.c, we have int __sys_connect(int fd, struct sockaddr __user *uservaddr, int addrlen) { ...... } ... SYSCALL_DEFINE3(connect, int, fd, struct sockaddr __user *, uservaddr, int, addrlen) { return __sys_connect(fd, uservaddr, addrlen); } The gcc compiler (8.5.0) does not inline __sys_connect() in syscall entry function. But latest clang trunk did the inlining. So the bpf program is not triggered. To make the test more reliable, let us kprobe the syscall entry function instead. Note that x86_64, arm64 and s390 have syscall wrappers and they have to be handled specially. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/probe_user.c | 4 +-- .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_probe_user.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)