From patchwork Wed Nov 10 07:02:34 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dust Li X-Patchwork-Id: 12611457 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F18FC433EF for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ED2611BF for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229618AbhKJHF0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:05:26 -0500 Received: from out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.54]:41864 "EHLO out30-54.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229545AbhKJHFZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:05:25 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R101e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04394;MF=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UvtXNbN_1636527754; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:dust.li@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UvtXNbN_1636527754) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:02:35 +0800 From: Dust Li To: Karsten Graul , Ursula Braun Cc: Tony Lu , guwen@linux.alibaba.com, Xuan Zhuo , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: fix sk_refcnt underflow on linkdown and fallback Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 15:02:34 +0800 Message-Id: <20211110070234.60527-1-dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org We got the following WARNING when running ab/nginx test with RDMA link flapping (up-down-up). The reason is when smc_sock fallback and at linkdown happens simultaneously, we may got the following situation: __smc_lgr_terminate() --> smc_conn_kill() --> smc_close_active_abort() smc_sock->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED sock_put(smc_sock) smc_sock was set to SMC_CLOSED and sock_put() been called when terminate the link group. But later application call close() on the socket, then we got: __smc_release(): if (smc_sock->fallback) smc_sock->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED sock_put(smc_sock) Again we set the smc_sock to CLOSED through it's already in CLOSED state, and double put the refcnt, so the following warning happens: refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 860 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x8d/0xf0 Modules linked in: CPU: 5 PID: 860 Comm: nginx Not tainted 5.10.46+ #403 Hardware name: Alibaba Cloud Alibaba Cloud ECS, BIOS 8c24b4c 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x8d/0xf0 Code: 05 5c 1e b5 01 01 e8 52 25 bc ff 0f 0b c3 80 3d 4f 1e b5 01 00 75 ad 48 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000527e50 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff8881300df2c0 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813bd58040 RDI: ffff88813bd58048 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff8881300df2c0 R11: ffffc90000527c78 R12: ffff8881300df340 R13: ffff8881300df930 R14: ffff88810b3dad80 R15: ffff8881300df4f8 FS: 00007f739de8fb80(0000) GS:ffff88813bd40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000a01b008 CR3: 0000000111b64003 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: smc_release+0x353/0x3f0 __sock_release+0x3d/0xb0 sock_close+0x11/0x20 __fput+0x93/0x230 task_work_run+0x65/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xf9/0x100 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This patch adds check in __smc_release() to make sure we won't do an extra sock_put() and set the socket to CLOSED when its already in CLOSED state. Fixes: 51f1de79ad8e (net/smc: replace sock_put worker by socket refcounting) Signed-off-by: Dust Li Reviewed-by: Tony Lu Signed-off-by: Dust Li Acked-by: Karsten Graul --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 0cf7ed2f5d41..59284da9116d 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -149,14 +149,18 @@ static int __smc_release(struct smc_sock *smc) sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD); sk->sk_shutdown |= SHUTDOWN_MASK; } else { - if (sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN && sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT) - sock_put(sk); /* passive closing */ - if (sk->sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) { - /* wake up clcsock accept */ - rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, SHUT_RDWR); + if (sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) { + if (sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN && + sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT) + sock_put(sk); /* passive closing */ + if (sk->sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) { + /* wake up clcsock accept */ + rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, + SHUT_RDWR); + } + sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED; + sk->sk_state_change(sk); } - sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED; - sk->sk_state_change(sk); smc_restore_fallback_changes(smc); }