@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ int extra_prog_load_log_flags = 0;
int bpf_prog_test_load(const char *file, enum bpf_prog_type type,
struct bpf_object **pobj, int *prog_fd)
{
+ struct bpf_object_load_attr attr = {};
struct bpf_object *obj;
struct bpf_program *prog;
int err;
@@ -105,7 +106,11 @@ int bpf_prog_test_load(const char *file, enum bpf_prog_type type,
if (type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC)
bpf_program__set_type(prog, type);
- err = bpf_object__load(obj);
+ bpf_program__set_extra_flags(prog, BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32);
+
+ attr.obj = obj;
+ attr.log_level = extra_prog_load_log_flags;
+ err = bpf_object__load_xattr(&attr);
if (err)
goto err_out;
After recent refactoring bpf_prog_test_load(), used across multiple selftests, lost ability to specify extra log_level 1 or 2 (for -vv and -vvv, respectively). Fix that problem by using bpf_object__load_xattr() API that supports extra log_level flags. Also restore BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 prog_flags by utilizing new bpf_program__set_extra_flags() API. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Fixes: f87c1930ac29 ("selftests/bpf: Merge test_stub.c into testing_helpers.c") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)