@@ -316,6 +316,11 @@ int st21nfca_connectivity_event_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 host,
return -ENOMEM;
transaction->aid_len = skb->data[1];
+
+ /* Checking if the length of the AID is valid */
+ if (transaction->aid_len > sizeof(transaction->aid))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
memcpy(transaction->aid, &skb->data[2],
transaction->aid_len);
@@ -325,6 +330,16 @@ int st21nfca_connectivity_event_received(struct nfc_hci_dev *hdev, u8 host,
return -EPROTO;
transaction->params_len = skb->data[transaction->aid_len + 3];
+
+ /*
+ * check if the length of the parameters is valid
+ * we can't use sizeof(transaction->params) because it's
+ * a flexible array member so we have to check if params_len
+ * is bigger than the space allocated for the array
+ */
+ if (transaction->params_len > ((skb->len - 2) - sizeof(struct nfc_evt_transaction)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
memcpy(transaction->params, skb->data +
transaction->aid_len + 4, transaction->params_len);
It appears that there are some buffer overflows in EVT_TRANSACTION. This happens because the length parameters that are passed to memcpy come directly from skb->data and are not guarded in any way. It would be nice if someone can review and test this patch because I don't own the hardware :) EDIT: Changed the comment styles and removed double newlines Signed-off-by: Jordy Zomer <jordy@pwning.systems> --- drivers/nfc/st21nfca/se.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)