diff mbox series

[net] vrf: Reset IPCB/IP6CB when processing outbound pkts in vrf dev xmit

Message ID 20211130162637.3249-1-ssuryaextr@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit ee201011c1e1563c114a55c86eb164b236f18e84
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net] vrf: Reset IPCB/IP6CB when processing outbound pkts in vrf dev xmit | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 3 blamed authors not CCed: shm@cumulusnetworks.com dsahern@kernel.org davem@davemloft.net; 4 maintainers not CCed: shm@cumulusnetworks.com davem@davemloft.net dsahern@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2 this patch: 2
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Stephen Suryaputra Nov. 30, 2021, 4:26 p.m. UTC
IPCB/IP6CB need to be initialized when processing outbound v4 or v6 pkts
in the codepath of vrf device xmit function so that leftover garbage
doesn't cause futher code that uses the CB to incorrectly process the
pkt.

One occasion of the issue might occur when MPLS route uses the vrf
device as the outgoing device such as when the route is added using "ip
-f mpls route add <label> dev <vrf>" command.

The problems seems to exist since day one. Hence I put the day one
commits on the Fixes tags.

Fixes: 193125dbd8eb ("net: Introduce VRF device driver")
Fixes: 35402e313663 ("net: Add IPv6 support to VRF device")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/vrf.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

David Ahern Dec. 1, 2021, 2:15 a.m. UTC | #1
On 11/30/21 9:26 AM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
> IPCB/IP6CB need to be initialized when processing outbound v4 or v6 pkts
> in the codepath of vrf device xmit function so that leftover garbage
> doesn't cause futher code that uses the CB to incorrectly process the
> pkt.
> 
> One occasion of the issue might occur when MPLS route uses the vrf
> device as the outgoing device such as when the route is added using "ip
> -f mpls route add <label> dev <vrf>" command.
> 
> The problems seems to exist since day one. Hence I put the day one
> commits on the Fixes tags.
> 
> Fixes: 193125dbd8eb ("net: Introduce VRF device driver")
> Fixes: 35402e313663 ("net: Add IPv6 support to VRF device")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/vrf.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Nicolas Dichtel Dec. 1, 2021, 8:18 a.m. UTC | #2
Le 30/11/2021 à 17:26, Stephen Suryaputra a écrit :
> IPCB/IP6CB need to be initialized when processing outbound v4 or v6 pkts
> in the codepath of vrf device xmit function so that leftover garbage
> doesn't cause futher code that uses the CB to incorrectly process the
> pkt.
> 
> One occasion of the issue might occur when MPLS route uses the vrf
> device as the outgoing device such as when the route is added using "ip
> -f mpls route add <label> dev <vrf>" command.
> 
> The problems seems to exist since day one. Hence I put the day one
> commits on the Fixes tags.
> 
> Fixes: 193125dbd8eb ("net: Introduce VRF device driver")
> Fixes: 35402e313663 ("net: Add IPv6 support to VRF device")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Thanks,
Nicolas
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Dec. 2, 2021, 3:10 a.m. UTC | #3
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:26:37 -0500 you wrote:
> IPCB/IP6CB need to be initialized when processing outbound v4 or v6 pkts
> in the codepath of vrf device xmit function so that leftover garbage
> doesn't cause futher code that uses the CB to incorrectly process the
> pkt.
> 
> One occasion of the issue might occur when MPLS route uses the vrf
> device as the outgoing device such as when the route is added using "ip
> -f mpls route add <label> dev <vrf>" command.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] vrf: Reset IPCB/IP6CB when processing outbound pkts in vrf dev xmit
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ee201011c1e1

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index ccf677015d5b..131c745dc701 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@  static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v6_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	/* strip the ethernet header added for pass through VRF device */
 	__skb_pull(skb, skb_network_offset(skb));
 
+	memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
 	ret = vrf_ip6_local_out(net, skb->sk, skb);
 	if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(ret)))
 		dev->stats.tx_errors++;
@@ -579,6 +580,7 @@  static netdev_tx_t vrf_process_v4_outbound(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					       RT_SCOPE_LINK);
 	}
 
+	memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb)));
 	ret = vrf_ip_local_out(dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev), skb->sk, skb);
 	if (unlikely(net_xmit_eval(ret)))
 		vrf_dev->stats.tx_errors++;