diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Test BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL macro

Message ID 20220207143134.2977852-3-hengqi.chen@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series libbpf: Add syscall-specific variant of BPF_KPROBE | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: Kenta.Tada@sony.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net john.fastabend@gmail.com kafai@fb.com shuah@kernel.org songliubraving@fb.com ast@kernel.org yhs@fb.com netdev@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next fail VM_Test

Commit Message

Hengqi Chen Feb. 7, 2022, 2:31 p.m. UTC 
Add tests for the newly added BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL macro.

Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c   |  6 +++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c   | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

--
2.30.2
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c
index f5f4c8adf539..87d05c8a7a4a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c
@@ -58,6 +58,12 @@  void test_bpf_syscall_macro(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg4_core, exp_arg4, "syscall_arg4_core_variant");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg5_core, exp_arg5, "syscall_arg5_core_variant");

+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->option_syscall, exp_arg1, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL_option");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg2_syscall, exp_arg2, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL_arg2");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg3_syscall, exp_arg3, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL_arg3");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg4_syscall, exp_arg4, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL_arg4");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg5_syscall, exp_arg5, "BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL_arg5");
+
 cleanup:
 	bpf_syscall_macro__destroy(skel);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c
index e7c622cb6a39..c1481fcbfacb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@  unsigned long arg4_core_cx = 0;
 unsigned long arg4_core = 0;
 unsigned long arg5_core = 0;

+int option_syscall = 0;
+unsigned long arg2_syscall = 0;
+unsigned long arg3_syscall = 0;
+unsigned long arg4_syscall = 0;
+unsigned long arg5_syscall = 0;
+
 const volatile pid_t filter_pid = 0;

 SEC("kprobe/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_prctl")
@@ -56,4 +62,21 @@  int BPF_KPROBE(handle_sys_prctl)
 	return 0;
 }

+SEC("kprobe/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_prctl")
+int BPF_KPROBE_SYSCALL(prctl_enter, int option, unsigned long arg2,
+		       unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5)
+{
+	pid_t pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
+
+	if (pid != filter_pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	option_syscall = option;
+	arg2_syscall = arg2;
+	arg3_syscall = arg3;
+	arg4_syscall = arg4;
+	arg5_syscall = arg5;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";