Message ID | 20220305204720.2978554-1-festevam@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | c70c453abcbf3ecbaadd4c3236a5119b8da365cf |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,net] smsc95xx: Ignore -ENODEV errors when device is unplugged | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master) by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>: On Sat, 5 Mar 2022 17:47:20 -0300 you wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > > According to Documentation/driver-api/usb/URB.rst when a device > is unplugged usb_submit_urb() returns -ENODEV. > > This error code propagates all the way up to usbnet_read_cmd() and > usbnet_write_cmd() calls inside the smsc95xx.c driver during > Ethernet cable unplug, unbind or reboot. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,net] smsc95xx: Ignore -ENODEV errors when device is unplugged https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/c70c453abcbf You are awesome, thank you!
Hello Fabio, Am Samstag, 5. März 2022, 21:47:20 CET schrieb Fabio Estevam: > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > > According to Documentation/driver-api/usb/URB.rst when a device > is unplugged usb_submit_urb() returns -ENODEV. > > This error code propagates all the way up to usbnet_read_cmd() and > usbnet_write_cmd() calls inside the smsc95xx.c driver during > Ethernet cable unplug, unbind or reboot. > > This causes the following errors to be shown on reboot, for example: > > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: remove, state 1 > usb usb2: USB disconnect, device number 1 > usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 > usb 2-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: unregister 'smsc95xx' usb-ci_hdrc.1-1.1, smsc95xx > USB 2.0 Ethernet smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Failed to read reg index > 0x00000114: -19 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Error reading MII_ACCESS > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: __smsc95xx_mdio_read: MII is busy > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Failed to read reg index 0x00000114: -19 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Error reading MII_ACCESS > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: __smsc95xx_mdio_read: MII is busy > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: hardware isn't capable of remote wakeup > usb 2-1.4: USB disconnect, device number 4 > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: USB bus 2 deregistered > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: remove, state 4 > usb usb1: USB disconnect, device number 1 > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: USB bus 1 deregistered > imx2-wdt 30280000.watchdog: Device shutdown: Expect reboot! > reboot: Restarting system > > Ignore the -ENODEV errors inside __smsc95xx_mdio_read() and > __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy() and do not print error messages > when -ENODEV is returned. Just FYI, this even fixed a suspend problem on a 5.10 imx downstream kernel which had similar symptoms. Thanks a lot. Regards Alexander > Fixes: a049a30fc27c ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx") > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > --- > Changes since v1: > - Added 'net' annotation - Andrew > - Added Fixes tag - Andrew > - Avoided undefined 'buf' behaviour in __smsc95xx_read_reg() - Andrew > > drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > index b17bff6a1015..e5b744851146 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > @@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet > *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_READ_REGISTER, USB_DIR_IN > > | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, > > 0, index, &buf, 4); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > - index, ret); > + if (ret < 0) { > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > + index, ret); > return ret; > } > > @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_write_reg(struct > usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_WRITE_REGISTER, > USB_DIR_OUT > > | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, > > 0, index, &buf, 4); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV) > netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to write reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > index, ret); > > @@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ static int __must_check > __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy(struct usbnet *dev, do { > ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, &val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ > + if (ret == -ENODEV) > + return 0; > netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_ACCESS\n"); > return ret; > } > @@ -194,7 +198,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_READ_ | > MII_BUSY_); > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -206,7 +211,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, > > ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_DATA, &val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -214,6 +220,10 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, > > done: > mutex_unlock(&dev->phy_mutex); > + > + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ > + if (ret == -ENODEV) > + return 0; > return ret; > } > > @@ -235,7 +245,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, > int phy_id, val = regval; > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_DATA, val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, > int phy_id, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_WRITE_ | MII_BUSY_); > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > goto done; > }
Am Samstag, 5. März 2022, 21:47:20 CET schrieb Fabio Estevam: > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > > According to Documentation/driver-api/usb/URB.rst when a device > is unplugged usb_submit_urb() returns -ENODEV. > > This error code propagates all the way up to usbnet_read_cmd() and > usbnet_write_cmd() calls inside the smsc95xx.c driver during > Ethernet cable unplug, unbind or reboot. > > This causes the following errors to be shown on reboot, for example: > > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: remove, state 1 > usb usb2: USB disconnect, device number 1 > usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 > usb 2-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: unregister 'smsc95xx' usb-ci_hdrc.1-1.1, smsc95xx > USB 2.0 Ethernet smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Failed to read reg index > 0x00000114: -19 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Error reading MII_ACCESS > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: __smsc95xx_mdio_read: MII is busy > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Failed to read reg index 0x00000114: -19 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Error reading MII_ACCESS > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: __smsc95xx_mdio_read: MII is busy > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: hardware isn't capable of remote wakeup > usb 2-1.4: USB disconnect, device number 4 > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: USB bus 2 deregistered > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: remove, state 4 > usb usb1: USB disconnect, device number 1 > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: USB bus 1 deregistered > imx2-wdt 30280000.watchdog: Device shutdown: Expect reboot! > reboot: Restarting system > > Ignore the -ENODEV errors inside __smsc95xx_mdio_read() and > __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy() and do not print error messages > when -ENODEV is returned. > > Fixes: a049a30fc27c ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx") > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> Oh BTW, is this queued for stable? Which versions? If 'Fixes: a049a30fc27c ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is the indicator, it's not enough. This errors also shows up on v5.15.27 and is fixed with this patch. Regards, Alexander > --- > Changes since v1: > - Added 'net' annotation - Andrew > - Added Fixes tag - Andrew > - Avoided undefined 'buf' behaviour in __smsc95xx_read_reg() - Andrew > > drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > index b17bff6a1015..e5b744851146 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > @@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet > *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_READ_REGISTER, USB_DIR_IN > > | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, > > 0, index, &buf, 4); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > - index, ret); > + if (ret < 0) { > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > + index, ret); > return ret; > } > > @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_write_reg(struct > usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_WRITE_REGISTER, > USB_DIR_OUT > > | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, > > 0, index, &buf, 4); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV) > netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to write reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > index, ret); > > @@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ static int __must_check > __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy(struct usbnet *dev, do { > ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, &val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ > + if (ret == -ENODEV) > + return 0; > netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_ACCESS\n"); > return ret; > } > @@ -194,7 +198,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_READ_ | > MII_BUSY_); > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -206,7 +211,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, > > ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_DATA, &val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -214,6 +220,10 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, > > done: > mutex_unlock(&dev->phy_mutex); > + > + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ > + if (ret == -ENODEV) > + return 0; > return ret; > } > > @@ -235,7 +245,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, > int phy_id, val = regval; > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_DATA, val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, > int phy_id, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_WRITE_ | MII_BUSY_); > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > goto done; > }
On Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:02:21 +0100 Alexander Stein wrote: > > Fixes: a049a30fc27c ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx") > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > > Oh BTW, is this queued for stable? Which versions? If 'Fixes: a049a30fc27c > ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is the indicator, it's not > enough. This errors also shows up on v5.15.27 and is fixed with this patch. The stable machinery will most likely suck it in automatically. The patch should reach Linus tomorrow evening if you want to ping Greg and make sure.
Hi Alexander, On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:02 AM Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> wrote: > Oh BTW, is this queued for stable? Which versions? If 'Fixes: a049a30fc27c > ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is the indicator, it's not > enough. This errors also shows up on v5.15.27 and is fixed with this patch. ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is also present in 5.15: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/log/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c?h=v5.15.27 so the fix should land in 5.15 too. For 5.10, when the fix reaches Linus' tree, then I will ping Dave/Jakub/Greg to apply the 3 latest smsc95xx commits to 5.10 stable tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/log/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c?id=c70c453abcbf I have been running 5.10 + the 3 commits above and no more smsc95xx errors are seen.
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c index b17bff6a1015..e5b744851146 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c @@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_READ_REGISTER, USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0, index, &buf, 4); - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", - index, ret); + if (ret < 0) { + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", + index, ret); return ret; } @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_write_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_WRITE_REGISTER, USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0, index, &buf, 4); - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV) netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to write reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", index, ret); @@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy(struct usbnet *dev, do { ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, &val, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ + if (ret == -ENODEV) + return 0; netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_ACCESS\n"); return ret; } @@ -194,7 +198,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, int idx, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_READ_ | MII_BUSY_); ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); goto done; } @@ -206,7 +211,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, int idx, ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_DATA, &val, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); goto done; } @@ -214,6 +220,10 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, int idx, done: mutex_unlock(&dev->phy_mutex); + + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ + if (ret == -ENODEV) + return 0; return ret; } @@ -235,7 +245,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, val = regval; ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_DATA, val, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); goto done; } @@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_WRITE_ | MII_BUSY_); ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); goto done; }