diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,16/17] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request

Message ID 20220318161528.1531164-17-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Introduce eBPF support for HID devices | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next

Commit Message

Benjamin Tissoires March 18, 2022, 4:15 p.m. UTC
Add tests for the newly implemented function.
We test here only the GET_REPORT part because the other calls are pure
HID protocol and won't infer the result of the test of the bpf hook.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

---

changes in v3:
- use the new hid_get_data API
- directly use HID_FEATURE_REPORT and HID_REQ_GET_REPORT from uapi

changes in v2:
- split the series by bpf/libbpf/hid/selftests and samples
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c      | 41 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
index e8aa1c6357e8..27b6ea7da599 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/hid.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ 
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <linux/hidraw.h>
 #include <linux/uhid.h>
+#include <linux/hid.h>
 
 static unsigned char rdesc[] = {
 	0x06, 0x00, 0xff,	/* Usage Page (Vendor Defined Page 1) */
@@ -67,6 +68,8 @@  static unsigned char rdesc[] = {
 	0xc0,			/* END_COLLECTION */
 };
 
+static u8 feature_data[] = { 1, 2 };
+
 static pthread_mutex_t uhid_started_mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
 static pthread_cond_t uhid_started = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
 
@@ -126,7 +129,7 @@  static void destroy(int fd)
 
 static int event(int fd)
 {
-	struct uhid_event ev;
+	struct uhid_event ev, answer;
 	ssize_t ret;
 
 	memset(&ev, 0, sizeof(ev));
@@ -143,6 +146,8 @@  static int event(int fd)
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
+	memset(&answer, 0, sizeof(answer));
+
 	switch (ev.type) {
 	case UHID_START:
 		pthread_mutex_lock(&uhid_started_mtx);
@@ -167,6 +172,15 @@  static int event(int fd)
 		break;
 	case UHID_GET_REPORT:
 		fprintf(stderr, "UHID_GET_REPORT from uhid-dev\n");
+
+		answer.type = UHID_GET_REPORT_REPLY;
+		answer.u.get_report_reply.id = ev.u.get_report.id;
+		answer.u.get_report_reply.err = ev.u.get_report.rnum == 1 ? 0 : -EIO;
+		answer.u.get_report_reply.size = sizeof(feature_data);
+		memcpy(answer.u.get_report_reply.data, feature_data, sizeof(feature_data));
+
+		uhid_write(fd, &answer);
+
 		break;
 	case UHID_SET_REPORT:
 		fprintf(stderr, "UHID_SET_REPORT from uhid-dev\n");
@@ -587,6 +601,59 @@  static int test_hid_set_get_bits(struct hid *hid_skel, int uhid_fd, int sysfs_fd
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Attach hid_user_raw_request to the given uhid device,
+ * call the bpf program from userspace
+ * check that the program is called and does the expected.
+ */
+static int test_hid_user_raw_request_call(struct hid *hid_skel, int uhid_fd, int sysfs_fd)
+{
+	int err, prog_fd;
+	u8 buf[10] = {0};
+	int ret = -1;
+
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, run_attrs,
+		    .repeat = 1,
+		    .ctx_in = &sysfs_fd,
+		    .ctx_size_in = sizeof(sysfs_fd),
+		    .data_in = buf,
+		    .data_size_in = sizeof(buf),
+		    .data_out = buf,
+		    .data_size_out = sizeof(buf),
+	);
+
+	/* attach hid_user_raw_request program */
+	hid_skel->links.hid_user_raw_request =
+		bpf_program__attach_hid(hid_skel->progs.hid_user_raw_request, sysfs_fd, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(hid_skel->links.hid_user_raw_request,
+			   "attach_hid(hid_user_raw_request)"))
+		return PTR_ERR(hid_skel->links.hid_user_raw_request);
+
+	buf[0] = HID_FEATURE_REPORT;
+	buf[1] = HID_REQ_GET_REPORT;
+	buf[2] = 1; /* report ID */
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(hid_skel->progs.hid_user_raw_request);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &run_attrs);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, 0, "bpf_prog_test_run_xattr"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(run_attrs.retval, 2, "bpf_prog_test_run_xattr_retval"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(buf[3], 2, "hid_user_raw_request_check_in"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ret = 0;
+
+cleanup:
+
+	hid__detach(hid_skel);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach hid_rdesc_fixup to the given uhid device,
  * retrieve and open the matching hidraw node,
@@ -700,6 +767,9 @@  void serial_test_hid_bpf(void)
 	err = test_hid_set_get_bits(hid_skel, uhid_fd, sysfs_fd);
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_set_get_data");
 
+	err = test_hid_user_raw_request_call(hid_skel, uhid_fd, sysfs_fd);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "hid_user_raw_request");
+
 	/*
 	 * this test should be run last because we disconnect/reconnect
 	 * the device, meaning that it changes the overall uhid device
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
index d57571b9af9a..d7b75c0cba4b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/hid.c
@@ -162,3 +162,44 @@  int hid_set_get_bits(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("hid/user_event")
+int hid_user_raw_request(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	int ret;
+	__u32 size;
+	__u8 rtype, reqtype;
+	__u8 *data = bpf_hid_get_data(ctx, 0 /* offset */, 10 /* size */);
+
+	if (!data)
+		return 0; /* EPERM check */
+
+	/*
+	 * build up a custom API for our needs:
+	 * offset 0, size 1: report type
+	 * offset 1, size 1: request type
+	 * offset 2+: data
+	 */
+	rtype = data[0];
+	reqtype = data[1];
+	size = ctx->size - 2;
+
+	if (size <= 8) {  /* 8 = len(data) - 2 */
+		ret = bpf_hid_raw_request(ctx,
+					  &data[2],
+					  size,
+					  rtype,
+					  reqtype);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	} else {
+		return -7; /* -E2BIG */
+	}
+
+	ctx->size = ret + 2;
+	ctx->retval = ret;
+
+	ret = 0;
+
+	return ret;
+}