diff mbox series

[net,v2,2/2] selftests: net: add delete nexthop route warning test

Message ID 20220401073343.277047-3-razor@blackwall.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 392baa339c6a42a2cb088e5e5df2b59b8f89be24
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series net: ipv4: fix nexthop route delete warning | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org shuah@kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 20 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Nikolay Aleksandrov April 1, 2022, 7:33 a.m. UTC
Add a test which causes a WARNING on kernels which treat a
nexthop route like a normal route when comparing for deletion and a
device is specified. That is, a route is found but we hit a warning while
matching it. The warning is from fib_info_nh() in include/net/nexthop.h
because we run it on a fib_info with nexthop object. The call chain is:
 inet_rtm_delroute -> fib_table_delete -> fib_nh_match (called with a
nexthop fib_info and also with fc_oif set thus calling fib_info_nh on
the fib_info and triggering the warning).

Repro steps:
 $ ip nexthop add id 12 via 172.16.1.3 dev veth1
 $ ip route add 172.16.101.1/32 nhid 12
 $ ip route delete 172.16.101.1/32 dev veth1

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
---
v2: adjusted test comment (dsa)

 tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
index d444ee6aa3cb..d8ede0c81ac1 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
@@ -1208,6 +1208,20 @@  ipv4_fcnal()
 	set +e
 	check_nexthop "dev veth1" ""
 	log_test $? 0 "Nexthops removed on admin down"
+
+	# nexthop route delete warning: route add with nhid and delete
+	# using device
+	run_cmd "$IP li set dev veth1 up"
+	run_cmd "$IP nexthop add id 12 via 172.16.1.3 dev veth1"
+	out1=`dmesg | grep "WARNING:.*fib_nh_match.*" | wc -l`
+	run_cmd "$IP route add 172.16.101.1/32 nhid 12"
+	run_cmd "$IP route delete 172.16.101.1/32 dev veth1"
+	out2=`dmesg | grep "WARNING:.*fib_nh_match.*" | wc -l`
+	[ $out1 -eq $out2 ]
+	rc=$?
+	log_test $rc 0 "Delete nexthop route warning"
+	run_cmd "$IP ip route delete 172.16.101.1/32 nhid 12"
+	run_cmd "$IP ip nexthop del id 12"
 }
 
 ipv4_grp_fcnal()