diff mbox series

[net-next,v3,02/18] net: dsa: sja1105: remove use of iterator after list_for_each_entry() loop

Message ID 20220412121557.3553555-3-jakobkoschel@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series Remove use of list iterator after loop body | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 17 of 17 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 66 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Jakob Koschel April 12, 2022, 12:15 p.m. UTC
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

The link below explains that there is a desire to syntactically change
list_for_each_entry() and list_for_each() such that it becomes
impossible to use the iterator variable outside the scope of the loop.

Although sja1105_insert_gate_entry() makes legitimate use of the
iterator pointer when it breaks out, the pattern it uses may become
illegal, so it needs to change.

It is deemed acceptable to use a copy of the loop iterator, and
sja1105_insert_gate_entry() only needs to know the list_head element
before which the list insertion should be made. So let's profit from the
occasion and refactor the list iteration to a dedicated function.

An additional benefit is given by the fact that with the helper function
in place, we no longer need to special-case the empty list, since it is
equivalent to not having found any gating entry larger than the
specified interval in the list. We just need to insert at the tail of
that list (list_add vs list_add_tail on an empty list does the same
thing).

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220407102900.3086255-3-jakobkoschel@gmail.com/#24810127
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c
index b7e95d60a6e4..369be2ac3587 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c
@@ -7,6 +7,27 @@ 
 
 #define SJA1105_SIZE_VL_STATUS			8
 
+static struct list_head *
+sja1105_first_entry_longer_than(struct list_head *entries,
+				s64 interval,
+				struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct sja1105_gate_entry *p;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(p, entries, list) {
+		if (p->interval == interval) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Gate conflict");
+			return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
+		}
+
+		if (interval < p->interval)
+			return &p->list;
+	}
+
+	/* Empty list, or specified interval is largest within the list */
+	return entries;
+}
+
 /* Insert into the global gate list, sorted by gate action time. */
 static int sja1105_insert_gate_entry(struct sja1105_gating_config *gating_cfg,
 				     struct sja1105_rule *rule,
@@ -14,6 +35,7 @@  static int sja1105_insert_gate_entry(struct sja1105_gating_config *gating_cfg,
 				     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
 	struct sja1105_gate_entry *e;
+	struct list_head *pos;
 	int rc;
 
 	e = kzalloc(sizeof(*e), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -24,25 +46,15 @@  static int sja1105_insert_gate_entry(struct sja1105_gating_config *gating_cfg,
 	e->gate_state = gate_state;
 	e->interval = entry_time;
 
-	if (list_empty(&gating_cfg->entries)) {
-		list_add(&e->list, &gating_cfg->entries);
-	} else {
-		struct sja1105_gate_entry *p;
-
-		list_for_each_entry(p, &gating_cfg->entries, list) {
-			if (p->interval == e->interval) {
-				NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
-						   "Gate conflict");
-				rc = -EBUSY;
-				goto err;
-			}
-
-			if (e->interval < p->interval)
-				break;
-		}
-		list_add(&e->list, p->list.prev);
+	pos = sja1105_first_entry_longer_than(&gating_cfg->entries,
+					      e->interval, extack);
+	if (IS_ERR(pos)) {
+		rc = PTR_ERR(pos);
+		goto err;
 	}
 
+	list_add(&e->list, pos->prev);
+
 	gating_cfg->num_entries++;
 
 	return 0;