diff mbox series

[bpf-next,09/12] selftests/bpf: Test BTF_KIND_ENUM64 for deduplication

Message ID 20220501190049.2580282-1-yhs@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add 64bit enum value support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 7 maintainers not CCed: songliubraving@fb.com shuah@kernel.org netdev@vger.kernel.org kafai@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: Missing commit description - Add an appropriate one WARNING: line length of 105 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 95 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 fail Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest + selftests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 fail Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 + selftests

Commit Message

Yonghong Song May 1, 2022, 7 p.m. UTC 
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko May 9, 2022, 11:37 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 12:00 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> ---

Please add some commit message, however trivial.

Can you please add a simple test to validate that enum and enum64 are
not deduplicated against each other?


>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>

[...]
Yonghong Song May 10, 2022, 10:44 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 5/9/22 4:37 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 12:00 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>> ---
> 
> Please add some commit message, however trivial.
> 
> Can you please add a simple test to validate that enum and enum64 are
> not deduplicated against each other?

okay.

> 
> 
>>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> [...]
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index 2af2ce5ec165..5295261f5393 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -7018,9 +7018,12 @@  static struct btf_dedup_test dedup_tests[] = {
 			BTF_DECL_TAG_ENC(NAME_TBD, 13, 1),				/* [16] decl_tag */
 			BTF_DECL_TAG_ENC(NAME_TBD, 7, -1),				/* [17] decl_tag */
 			BTF_TYPE_TAG_ENC(NAME_TBD, 8),					/* [18] type_tag */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_TBD, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 2), 8),	/* [19] enum64 */
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 0, 0),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 1, 1),
 			BTF_END_RAW,
 		},
-		BTF_STR_SEC("\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E\0F\0G\0H\0I\0J\0K\0L\0M\0N\0O\0P\0Q\0R"),
+		BTF_STR_SEC("\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E\0F\0G\0H\0I\0J\0K\0L\0M\0N\0O\0P\0Q\0R\0S\0T\0U"),
 	},
 	.expect = {
 		.raw_types = {
@@ -7048,9 +7051,12 @@  static struct btf_dedup_test dedup_tests[] = {
 			BTF_DECL_TAG_ENC(NAME_TBD, 13, 1),				/* [16] decl_tag */
 			BTF_DECL_TAG_ENC(NAME_TBD, 7, -1),				/* [17] decl_tag */
 			BTF_TYPE_TAG_ENC(NAME_TBD, 8),					/* [18] type_tag */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_TBD, BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 2), 8),	/* [19] enum64 */
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 0, 0),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_TBD, 1, 1),
 			BTF_END_RAW,
 		},
-		BTF_STR_SEC("\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E\0F\0G\0H\0I\0J\0K\0L\0M\0N\0O\0P\0Q\0R"),
+		BTF_STR_SEC("\0A\0B\0C\0D\0E\0F\0G\0H\0I\0J\0K\0L\0M\0N\0O\0P\0Q\0R\0S\0T\0U"),
 	},
 },
 {
@@ -7511,6 +7517,64 @@  static struct btf_dedup_test dedup_tests[] = {
 		BTF_STR_SEC("\0tag1\0t\0m"),
 	},
 },
+{
+	.descr = "dedup: enum64, standalone",
+	.input = {
+		.raw_types = {
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 1, 123),
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 1, 123),
+			BTF_END_RAW,
+		},
+		BTF_STR_SEC("\0e1\0e1_val"),
+	},
+	.expect = {
+		.raw_types = {
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 1, 123),
+			BTF_END_RAW,
+		},
+		BTF_STR_SEC("\0e1\0e1_val"),
+	},
+},
+{
+	.descr = "dedup: enum64, fwd resolution",
+	.input = {
+		.raw_types = {
+			/* [1] fwd enum64 'e1' before full enum */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 0), 8),
+			/* [2] full enum64 'e1' after fwd */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 1, 123),
+			/* [3] full enum64 'e2' before fwd */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(4), 0, 456),
+			/* [4] fwd enum64 'e2' after full enum */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 0), 8),
+			/* [5] incompatible full enum64 with different value */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 0, 321),
+			BTF_END_RAW,
+		},
+		BTF_STR_SEC("\0e1\0e1_val\0e2\0e2_val"),
+	},
+	.expect = {
+		.raw_types = {
+			/* [1] full enum64 'e1' */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 1, 123),
+			/* [2] full enum64 'e2' */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(3), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(4), 0, 456),
+			/* [3] incompatible full enum64 with different value */
+			BTF_TYPE_ENC(NAME_NTH(1), BTF_INFO_ENC(BTF_KIND_ENUM64, 0, 1), 8),
+				BTF_ENUM64_ENC(NAME_NTH(2), 0, 321),
+			BTF_END_RAW,
+		},
+		BTF_STR_SEC("\0e1\0e1_val\0e2\0e2_val"),
+	},
+},
 
 };
 
@@ -7535,6 +7599,8 @@  static int btf_type_size(const struct btf_type *t)
 		return base_size + sizeof(__u32);
 	case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
 		return base_size + vlen * sizeof(struct btf_enum);
+	case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
+		return base_size + vlen * sizeof(struct btf_enum64);
 	case BTF_KIND_ARRAY:
 		return base_size + sizeof(struct btf_array);
 	case BTF_KIND_STRUCT: