From patchwork Tue May 10 20:59:23 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kui-Feng Lee X-Patchwork-Id: 12845538 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E220C433EF for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 21:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232771AbiEJVCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 17:02:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54034 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233697AbiEJVCS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 May 2022 17:02:18 -0400 Received: from mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com [67.231.145.42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12934268EBD for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0109333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 24AJH8QK014394 for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:02:17 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fb.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type; s=facebook; bh=iZsOHRvgL5PWCUAfF/SrBmDyVmWKwdWIM4SHpyqMs+I=; b=oMPp60tgTZtAScOjE82roCjjtBw5Z9dZSNdGwrt88X3jYSInW2uwcTj67Yr8IcnVpDh/ n815Z1m8vqN/K7eODjQSbonE/Gbaypxb38N9oDhSM07PqltcQw/+txTNl5hjfWigixrP eOV4jGVzcJ2CkSULUWvoxse3sWU8aBXE5Jc= Received: from mail.thefacebook.com ([163.114.132.120]) by mx0a-00082601.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fyx2n0scg-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:02:17 -0700 Received: from twshared8307.18.frc3.facebook.com (2620:10d:c085:208::f) by mail.thefacebook.com (2620:10d:c085:21d::5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 10 May 2022 14:02:16 -0700 Received: by devbig931.frc1.facebook.com (Postfix, from userid 460691) id 59E0832F2037; Tue, 10 May 2022 13:59:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Kui-Feng Lee To: , , , , CC: Kui-Feng Lee Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 5/5] selftest/bpf: The test cses of BPF cookie for fentry/fexit/fmod_ret/lsm. Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:59:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20220510205923.3206889-6-kuifeng@fb.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20220510205923.3206889-1-kuifeng@fb.com> References: <20220510205923.3206889-1-kuifeng@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-FB-Internal: Safe X-Proofpoint-GUID: 6qA8hyPoTVpP00D4I2RM95OUSyn8uNHp X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 6qA8hyPoTVpP00D4I2RM95OUSyn8uNHp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-10_07,2022-05-10_01,2022-02-23_01 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Make sure BPF cookies are correct for fentry/fexit/fmod_ret/lsm. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_cookie.c | 52 +++++++++-- 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c index 923a6139b2d8..83ef55e3caa4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c @@ -4,8 +4,11 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include +#include +#include #include "test_bpf_cookie.skel.h" #include "kprobe_multi.skel.h" @@ -410,6 +413,88 @@ static void pe_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel) bpf_link__destroy(link); } +static void tracing_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel) +{ + __u64 cookie; + int prog_fd; + int fentry_fd = -1, fexit_fd = -1, fmod_ret_fd = -1; + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, opts); + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, link_opts); + + skel->bss->fentry_res = 0; + skel->bss->fexit_res = 0; + + cookie = 0x10000000000000L; + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fentry_test1); + link_opts.tracing.cookie = cookie; + fentry_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_FENTRY, &link_opts); + if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "fentry.link_create")) + goto cleanup; + + cookie = 0x20000000000000L; + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fexit_test1); + link_opts.tracing.cookie = cookie; + fexit_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_FEXIT, &link_opts); + if (!ASSERT_GE(fexit_fd, 0, "fexit.link_create")) + goto cleanup; + + cookie = 0x30000000000000L; + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fmod_ret_test); + link_opts.tracing.cookie = cookie; + fmod_ret_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_MODIFY_RETURN, &link_opts); + if (!ASSERT_GE(fmod_ret_fd, 0, "fmod_ret.link_create")) + goto cleanup; + + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fentry_test1); + bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &opts); + + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.fmod_ret_test); + bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &opts); + + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fentry_res, 0x10000000000000L, "fentry_res"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fexit_res, 0x20000000000000L, "fexit_res"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->fmod_ret_res, 0x30000000000000L, "fmod_ret_res"); + +cleanup: + if (fentry_fd >= 0) + close(fentry_fd); + if (fexit_fd >= 0) + close(fexit_fd); + if (fmod_ret_fd >= 0) + close(fmod_ret_fd); +} + +int stack_mprotect(void); + +static void lsm_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel) +{ + __u64 cookie; + int prog_fd; + int lsm_fd = -1; + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, link_opts); + + skel->bss->lsm_res = 0; + + cookie = 0x90000000000090L; + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_int_hook); + link_opts.tracing.cookie = cookie; + lsm_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, 0, BPF_LSM_MAC, &link_opts); + if (!ASSERT_GE(lsm_fd, 0, "lsm.link_create")) + goto cleanup; + + stack_mprotect(); + if (!ASSERT_EQ(errno, EPERM, "stack_mprotect")) + goto cleanup; + + usleep(1); + + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->lsm_res, 0x90000000000090L, "fentry_res"); + +cleanup: + if (lsm_fd >= 0) + close(lsm_fd); +} + void test_bpf_cookie(void) { struct test_bpf_cookie *skel; @@ -432,6 +517,10 @@ void test_bpf_cookie(void) tp_subtest(skel); if (test__start_subtest("perf_event")) pe_subtest(skel); + if (test__start_subtest("trampoline")) + tracing_subtest(skel); + if (test__start_subtest("lsm")) + lsm_subtest(skel); test_bpf_cookie__destroy(skel); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_cookie.c index 0e2222968918..22d0ac8709b4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_cookie.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_cookie.c @@ -4,18 +4,23 @@ #include "vmlinux.h" #include #include +#include int my_tid; -int kprobe_res; -int kprobe_multi_res; -int kretprobe_res; -int uprobe_res; -int uretprobe_res; -int tp_res; -int pe_res; +__u64 kprobe_res; +__u64 kprobe_multi_res; +__u64 kretprobe_res; +__u64 uprobe_res; +__u64 uretprobe_res; +__u64 tp_res; +__u64 pe_res; +__u64 fentry_res; +__u64 fexit_res; +__u64 fmod_ret_res; +__u64 lsm_res; -static void update(void *ctx, int *res) +static void update(void *ctx, __u64 *res) { if (my_tid != (u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid()) return; @@ -82,4 +87,35 @@ int handle_pe(struct pt_regs *ctx) return 0; } +SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") +int BPF_PROG(fentry_test1, int a) +{ + update(ctx, &fentry_res); + return 0; +} + +SEC("fexit/bpf_fentry_test1") +int BPF_PROG(fexit_test1, int a, int ret) +{ + update(ctx, &fexit_res); + return 0; +} + +SEC("fmod_ret/bpf_modify_return_test") +int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, int *_b, int _ret) +{ + update(ctx, &fmod_ret_res); + return 1234; +} + +SEC("lsm/file_mprotect") +int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot, int ret) +{ + if (my_tid != (u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid()) + return ret; + update(ctx, &lsm_res); + return -EPERM; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";